Reddfugee42
@Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
- Comment on On trees... 2 hours ago:
So is corn
- Comment on venomous 1 day ago:
Creationist ones might
- Comment on >:)> 2 days ago:
Curious to consider that by being an apex consumer, it is a predator by default, even if its prey is flora.
- Comment on Southport attack survivor calls for kitchen knives to be blunt tipped 4 days ago:
Stick one of those in a pencil sharpener and look out, world
- Comment on Neville Page Says ‘Star Trek: Discovery’ Season 1 Klingons Were “A Salty Broth” 1 week ago:
You mean the Skittles Klingons?
- Comment on Are there any TV series you gave up on, or just forgot about due to insane gaps between seasons? 1 week ago:
Bailed on Dexter a season or three before the end
- Comment on Anon hasn't given up hope 2 weeks ago:
Yeah but other than that
- Comment on NO TO AI 2 weeks ago:
None of the past comparisons have been wrong about anything but the level of complexity.
- Comment on What are some examples of some of the most well-known and watched TV series at the time that been forgotten culturally? 2 weeks ago:
The only thing worse than the ending is the insufferable people who will endlessly try to convince you how perfect the ending was simply because it’s subverted expectations. Well yeah, everybody turning into a fucking Autobots and blasting off into space would subvert expectations too. That alone doesn’t make it a good ending.
- Comment on What are some examples of some of the most well-known and watched TV series at the time that been forgotten culturally? 2 weeks ago:
I binged the whole series and the series finale was just a normal episode, and a bad one. I was like, that’s fuckin it? So damn bizarre.
- Comment on NO TO AI 2 weeks ago:
Brains are machines like AI, trained by other machines, generating content based on content we’ve been trained on. It’s hubris to pretend we’re anything else.
- Comment on Correct 2 weeks ago:
- Comment on NO TO AI 2 weeks ago:
- Comment on NO TO AI 2 weeks ago:
Not uncritically an irrationally hating AI to its very core is going to upset the hivemind
- Comment on ‘Y: Marshals’: CBS Orders ‘Yellowstone’ Sequel Starring Luke Grimes As Kayce Dutton 2 weeks ago:
- Comment on Gina Rinehart urges Liberal party to stick with Trump-like policies in the wake of election loss 2 weeks ago:
The logic checks out… Thanks for the double check.
- Comment on Camarasarus 2 weeks ago:
- Comment on Nvidia CEO says being locked out of China AI market would be 'tremendous loss' 2 weeks ago:
I’m sure IBM felt the same way when the concentration camps were shut down
- Comment on Nvidia CEO says being locked out of China AI market would be 'tremendous loss' 2 weeks ago:
Cope
- Comment on Gina Rinehart urges Liberal party to stick with Trump-like policies in the wake of election loss 2 weeks ago:
Trump lost the popular vote. Three times in a row.
- Comment on ‘Y: Marshals’: CBS Orders ‘Yellowstone’ Sequel Starring Luke Grimes As Kayce Dutton 2 weeks ago:
Is it just me or does nobody in Yellowstone have any really redeeming characteristics? It’s entertaining but I don’t really find myself rooting for anyone and I wouldn’t mind if anyone got wiped off the board.
- Comment on Pd(PPh3)4 2 weeks ago:
You can lick anything once
- Comment on Do you know the answer? 2 weeks ago:
E.
- Comment on Can't believe we have to say this but, don't use your work email for adult content 2 weeks ago:
This is gonna help me in my meeting with HR tomorrow. Thanks!
- Comment on Do you know the answer? 2 weeks ago:
This is a self-referential paradox — a classic logic puzzle designed to be tricky. Let’s break it down:
Step-by-step analysis:
-
How many choices? There are 4 possible answers, so if we pick one randomly, the chance of picking any specific one is 1 in 4 = 25%.
-
How many answers say “25%”? Two.
-
That means the probability of randomly choosing an answer that says “25%” is 2 in 4 = 50%.
-
But if the correct answer is 50%, then only one option says “50%” — which is ©. So the probability of picking it at random is 1 in 4 = 25%, contradicting the idea that 50% is correct.
-
If the correct answer is 25%, then two options say that — a and d. So the chance of picking one of those at random is 50%, not 25% — again a contradiction.
-
Similarly, if 60% is correct (only one option), then the chance of picking it randomly is 25%, which again makes it incorrect.
Conclusion: Any choice leads to a contradiction. This is a self-referential paradox, meaning the question breaks logical consistency. There is no consistent correct answer.
-
- Comment on Your majesty 2 weeks ago:
We simply respond with the fact that we anthropomorphize our own as well.
(Isn’t that right, big fella?)
- Comment on A string of driver hotfixes suggests Nvidia RTX 50 GPUs are having trouble keeping their software down 3 weeks ago:
What does it mean to keep software down?
- Comment on Anon missed /pol/ 3 weeks ago:
The gun people were always more scared of brown people than theywere in love with the Constitution. All anyone needs to do to violate the Constitution with impunity is go along with hating brown people and the simple little 2A people think they’re on the same team.
- Comment on Transitioning in STEM 4 weeks ago:
Lol not from what I’ve heard about Italy
- Comment on Bees don't have lungs. 4 weeks ago:
Square Cube Law