Comment

Comment on Bait or r*ta*d*ti*n. Call it.

You keep mistaking anger for clarity. And I get it—that rage you’re carrying is earned. You’ve been watching a party that claims to fight for working people repeatedly fold in the name of bipartisanship, inaction, and big donor interests. You’ve watched policies you care about gutted, leaders you believe in sidelined, and warmongers handed the keys. You’re right to be pissed. But you’re swinging wildly and hitting everything in sight—including people who aren’t your enemies. You’re doing exactly what you accuse centrist Democrats of doing: handing power to the right by making the left ungovernable.

I’m not defending Musk, and I never have. If I could snap my fingers and vaporize his empire of tech-bro fascism tomorrow, I would. But you don’t get rid of oligarchs like Musk by pretending they don’t exist, or by refusing to engage with the systems they’ve embedded themselves in. You call that “simpering,” but that’s only because you’re desperate for a clean moral fight in a system that was built to prevent one. And your refusal to acknowledge that this is about tactics, not loyalty, is what turns your critique into just another flame war screed.

You claim I have no objection to Democratic sellouts, but I’ve literally listed examples where I agree with you: the public option betrayal, the Manchin theater, the Biden admin’s groveling to Netanyahu, and yes, the DCCC backing centrists over insurgents like Cisneros. Those were all shameful, and I said so. You think I’m blind to this. I’m not. I’m just not ready to throw every Democrat into the same trash fire because they’re not all equally culpable. The same party that primaries progressives is also the only one with members even trying to hold billionaires and the far-right accountable. That contradiction sucks. It also happens to be the battlefield we’re on. You can hate the terrain all you want—it’s still the place the fight is happening.

Your biggest tell, though, is how you keep trying to paint me as someone who wants to appease Nazis. That’s lazy, and you know it. You’re not arguing in good faith if you take someone saying “governments have to deal with the powerful forces that exist” and twist it into “you love Elon.” It’s the kind of kneejerk purity politics that makes the left easy to ignore. Not because it’s wrong in its goals, but because it can’t tell the difference between an enemy, an imperfect ally, and a potential pressure point. When the default setting is “everyone who isn’t radical enough is the same as a Nazi,” the right doesn’t need to destroy the left—the left does it to itself.

You say I should start applying pressure. I am. I back the AOCs and Jayapals. I donate, organize, and raise hell when Biden kisses Netanyahu’s ring or when the DNC backs scumbags like Cuellar. But I also don’t confuse shouting into a comment thread with changing the world. Rage is fuel, not a strategy. And as long as your strategy is just typing “nazi” in all caps at anyone who doesn’t fit your purity checklist, you’re playing right into the hands of the people consolidating actual power.

You want to be part of the fight? Then be part of it. But know the difference between sabotage and dissent. Because right now, you’re throwing stones at the people you’ll need beside you if we ever want to break the machine instead of just rage at it.

source

Sort:hotnew top

Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

You keep mistaking anger for clarity.

If you don’t have the clarity to admit that elon musk is a nazi, don’t tell anyone else about clarity.

And I get it—that rage you’re carrying is earned.

By people you are defending.

You’ve been watching a party that claims to fight for working people repeatedly fold in the name of bipartisanship, inaction, and big donor interests. You’ve watched policies you care about gutted, leaders you believe in sidelined, and warmongers handed the keys. You’re right to be pissed.

And you’re wrong to defend them.

But you’re swinging wildly and hitting everything in sight—including people who aren’t your enemies.

nazis are my enemies.

You’re doing exactly what you accuse centrist Democrats of doing: handing power to the right by making the left ungovernable.

Well maybe elon will fix that for you.

I’m not defending Musk, and I never have.

You’re defending democrats who are eager to do whatever he wants for money. That’s a distinction without much of a difference.

If I could snap my fingers and vaporize his empire of tech-bro fascism tomorrow, I would.

I doubt it.

But you don’t get rid of oligarchs like Musk by pretending they don’t exist, or by refusing to engage with the systems they’ve embedded themselves in.

musk just pissed off his only major customer. democrats do not need to provide him a replacement. Without access to the government teat, he will fail.

You claim I have no objection to Democratic sellouts, but I’ve literally listed examples where I agree with you: the public option betrayal, the Manchin theater, the Biden admin’s groveling to Netanyahu, and yes, the DCCC backing centrists over insurgents like Cisneros. Those were all shameful, and I said so. You think I’m blind to this. I’m not.

And now that all of those are faits accompli, you’ve come around. This latest thing with elon will be the wrong decision after the fact too, once the party has moved on to something inexplicably worse.

I’m just not ready to throw every Democrat into the same trash fire because they’re not all equally culpable.

Of course they’re not. But the ones who are should not be allowed to continue unopposed. Others will get the idea that they can get away with working for elon the nazi instead of the American people. Just like they worked for netanyahu. If it doesn’t stop with support for a man who delivered nazi salutes, will it ever?

It’s the kind of kneejerk purity politics that makes the left easy to ignore.

Until after the election, when they’re to blame for all the world’s ills, in order to justify moving to the right. In this case, into the arms of a literal nazi.

Not because it’s wrong in its goals, but because it can’t tell the difference between an enemy, an imperfect ally, and a potential pressure point.

netanyahu was the previous imperfect ally. manchin before him. The party did everything both men wanted. elon will be no different.

You say I should start applying pressure. I am. I back the AOCs and Jayapals. I donate, organize, and raise hell when Biden kisses Netanyahu’s ring or when the DNC backs scumbags like Cuellar.

I would ask if there are any examples of this in your comment history, but conveniently:

But I also don’t confuse shouting into a comment thread with changing the world.

I live in texas. Shouting into a comment thread is all I have at my disposal. My rep is a republican. Both of my senators are republicans. It’s republicans all the way up. So when I see democrats, cast their lots with a nazi at the end of decades of betrayal, what else am I to do?

They didn’t betray you.

And as long as your strategy is just typing “nazi” in all caps at anyone who doesn’t fit your purity checklist, you’re playing right into the hands of the people consolidating actual power.

And bleating “pUrItY” at anyone with standards is how centrists consolidate that power with republicans.

You want to be part of the fight? Then be part of it. But know the difference between sabotage and dissent.

Right. sabotage is anything to the left of elon musk.

Because right now, you’re throwing stones at the people you’ll need beside you if we ever want to break the machine instead of just rage at it.

The people I need are jumping all over themselves to defend people who want to work with nazis and never progressives. It’s your machine.

source
- Reddfugee42@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
  You keep acting like saying “Elon Musk is a Nazi” is some kind of sacred password that proves moral clarity, when in fact it just shows you’ve got your rhetorical hammer and now everything’s a fascist-shaped nail. I don’t need to prove to you that I see Musk for exactly what he is—he’s a megalomaniacal, racist, transphobic, apartheid-raised billionaire whose social media platform has become a fascist pipeline and who pals around with actual white supremacists. You don’t get points for calling that out. That’s the bare minimum. The difference is I’m not so lost in self-righteousness that I think calling him names solves anything.
  
  You say I’m defending the people who caused your rage. I say I’m trying to contain the blast radius before it consumes the few people actually trying to do something meaningful within a system that is already rigged to serve the wealthy and powerful. You want to burn it all down, fine. But don’t pretend you’re building anything when all you do is torch and sneer. What you call “standards,” the rest of us recognize as reactive nihilism.
  
  You assume I’ll come around later and admit that cozying up to Musk was a mistake. Maybe I will. Maybe it is a mistake. But the difference between us is that I’m not pretending every decision exists in a vacuum. Musk is a threat now. Not talking to him doesn’t erase him. Not trying to neutralize him doesn’t make him go away. If he gets locked out of government entirely and goes full mask-off fascist kingpin online, who does that help? Do you think he’ll disappear because we’re mad enough on Twitter? No—he’ll just consolidate more influence through the very networks progressives get deplatformed from. The idea that his empire will collapse if the Democrats just ignore him is a fantasy. You know how many times people said “this is the moment Musk is finished”? It never is. The man built rockets with public money and used them to troll the president on his own platform. That’s not someone who disappears because you wrote a scathing post on Reddit.
  
  You’re right that we shouldn’t let Dems cozy up to him without consequences. That’s why we raise hell. That’s why I back people like Bowman and Bush even when the party machine tries to ice them out. But your argument isn’t about pressure—it’s about banishment. It’s “if you ever deal with this person, you’re dead to me.” That’s not movement-building, that’s purity cosplay. The right doesn’t fall apart like this. They lock arms and march into the fire. We call everyone who flinches a quisling and then act shocked when progress stalls.
  
  You don’t trust me to oppose fascists because I don’t use your exact tone or terms. But here’s the truth: I’ve been in this fight longer than you know. I’ve canvassed for abortion rights in red states, protested ICE, fundraised for progressive candidates the DNC ghosted. I don’t owe you proof that I give a damn. What I won’t do is turn every Democrat who makes a bad call into a crypto-fascist and every strategic interaction into treason. That’s not vigilance—that’s emotional gratification masquerading as politics.
  
  If all you’ve got left is comment threads, use them to demand better, not to alienate everyone who doesn’t meet your ever-shifting purity line. You’re not powerless because you’re in Texas—you’re acting powerless because you’ve already decided everyone sucks and nothing matters. But if that’s true, why are you even arguing? Either you think people can be pushed or you don’t. And if you don’t, then what the hell are you fighting for?
  
  You think it’s my machine? Fine. Then help break it from the inside. But if you’d rather be the guy heckling from the sidelines because nobody’s pure enough to link arms with, don’t be surprised when the only people left marching are the ones who want to burn the world down for real.
  
  source
  - Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago
    
    You keep acting like saying “Elon Musk is a Nazi” is some kind of sacred password that proves moral clarity, when in fact it just shows you’ve got your rhetorical hammer and now everything’s a fascist-shaped nail. I don’t need to prove to you that I see Musk for exactly what he is—he’s a megalomaniacal, racist, transphobic, apartheid-raised billionaire whose social media platform has become a fascist pipeline and who pals around with actual white supremacists. You don’t get points for calling that out. That’s the bare minimum. The difference is I’m not so lost in self-righteousness that I think calling him names solves anything.
    
    That’s a lot of words to avoid four little letters.
    
    You don’t trust me to oppose fascists because I don’t use your exact tone or terms.
    
    I don’t trust you to oppose fascists because you’re advocating working with a nazi and refusing to call him one.
    
    source