Square!

Comments

• cybervseas@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  When you miss one important constraint in your CAD project.

  source

  • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Oh man I felt this.

    source
• RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Kona forgot the sides being parallel part. Like missing a step in assembling IKEA furniture, its not gonna turn out right.

  source

  • SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    You don’t normally need to specify that the sides are parallel if you specify four right angles.

    source
  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Also pretty sure definition of a shape requires only one enclosed or contiguous area.

    source

    • angrystego@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      This one is enclosed and contiguous though, the lines of the triangle end where the circular line starts. (The rest is just a drafting residue.)

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • naught101@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Those arc sides are parallel in polar coordinates.

    source
• masterofn001@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Wouldn’t the angles need to be interior?

  source

  • Maven@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    They are all interior to the meme

    source

    • errer@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Image

      source
    • Kolanaki@yiffit.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      This meme seems to be in a 16:9 ratio making it a rectangle.

      source
  • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    This is merely a projection of a square on the surface of a cone projected onto a plane.

    source
  • LodeMike@lemmy.today ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    This is also not a polygon. It has infinite and 2 sides at the same time.

    source
  • tate@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    This actually has six right angles if you include exterior ones.

    source
• RangerJosie@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Easy there Diogenes.

  source
• owenfromcanada@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Anarchy geometry

  source

  • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    If anyone makes this community, let me know please.

    source

    • jdeath@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      i will make it, but i won’t tell you

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• cows_are_underrated@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  A square has all right angles inside the structure. This thing has two inside and two outside.

  source

  • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    If you add that to the definition, you could still have a “square” with a segment of a circle connecting the edges in the middle

    source

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Then that section would be of a shorter length.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • Alinor@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    But arent the ones from the circle 90 degrees on the inside of the circle as well?

    source

    • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      This is true, however now it has 4 inside and two outside the structure, so it now has something a square doesn’t has.

      source
  • multifariace@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Parallelogram.

    source
• lemmyng@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Image

  source

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Out of 4 lines

    source
• Siethron@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  This has an infinite number of sides

  source
• AVincentInSpace@pawb.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  xkcd - Bendy

  source
• werefreeatlast@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  This is what AI would give you after countless tries strating with a triangle and having gone up the Pentagon and down to two pairs of unconnected parallel lines…but what if all equally sized lines were connected? Bam! This

  source

  • Hackworth@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Fun Fact: It is very difficult to get any of the image generators to make a pentagon.

    source

    • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      I thought this couldn’t be true, so using one of the newer models (4bit flux) I told it to make a 5 sided star, and then put lines around the outside

      Image

      lol this is very weird, did they forbid it from looking at pentagons in the training data or something? it can’t do The Pentagon either, it gives it 8-12 sides instead

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• EpeeGnome@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  A square? A square?! Wake up sheeple! That things not even a rombus! Don’t you see the lies? Look at the lines! Look! Not all rhombuses are squares, but all squares are rhombuses! All squares are rhombuses and look at this thing they try to call a square. Where are the parallel lines? There’s got to be parallel lines, don’t you see, or then it’s not a rombus and all squares are rhombuses. Don’t forget that, don’t let them take that fact from you and perpetuate their geometric lies. Does no one even remember what a rombus is? This is, this is basic geometry here that you should have learned in middle school or elementary school, but then you just forget it, and let people trick you with these misleading definitions and fancy diagrams but you have to remember that a Square. Is. A. Rombus.

  source

  • cram42@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    And all rhombus are parallelograms. By definition opposing sides must be parallel.

    source

    • EpeeGnome@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      YES.

      source
  • OlPatchy2Eyes@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    You have shown me the truth

    source
  • propter_hog@hexbear.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    This is why proper geometry is always well defined.

    source
• tiddy@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  270°≠90°

  You could say a regular square has 4 270° exterior angles

  source
• OpenStars@discuss.online ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Poor Pac-Man does not look quite okay… :-(

  source

  • chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    That’s a Pac-lapse.

    source
• LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Now make a square out of squiggly yarn

  String theorists claim this is the true shape of spacetime!

  source

  • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    relevant xkcd

    source
• expatriado@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  thinking outside the square

  source
• naught101@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  This is a square in polar coordinates

  source
• mypasswordis1234@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Squircle

  source

  • TriflingToad@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    of course there’s a Wikipedia page for that

    source
  • dance_ninja@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Man I miss my Zune 80

    source
• Hupf@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Take that, Euclid!

  source
• niktemadur@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  It’s Pac-Man with a megaphone!

  source

  • Agent641@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Pac-man eating a new york slice

    source

    • niktemadur@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Pac-Man’s & Sons Original Famous
      two blocks away from
      Pac-Man’s Original
      which is a block and a half away from
      Pac-Man’s Famous
      across the street from
      Pac-Man’s & Sons Famous
      etc.

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • Zementid@feddit.nl ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Or a comically big joint.

    source

    • niktemadur@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Pac-Marley

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • grrgyle@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    you geometry people go too far stop personifying vertexes, planes, and points math shouldn’t be fun

    source
• Rentlar@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  HOW ELMO, HOW?!?

  Image

  source
• fossilesque@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  tihi

  source

  • Maven@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Ik exactly what this means but every single time I read it it makes me do the Micheal Jackson thing…

    TEE-HEE

    source

    • fossilesque@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      “Thanks I hate it”

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• Redderthanmisty@lemmygrad.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  This is a squircle

  source

  • vovchik_ilich@hexbear.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    I’m more of a charmander guy

    source

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      “Pythagorachu! I choose you!”
      *A terrified old man tumbles onto the grass screaming in Latin*

      source
• SkyNTP@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Is a corner with an angle of 180 degrees a corner? If yes, then all shapes have infinite corners and infinite edges.

  source

  • jdeath@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    free real estate

    source
• propter_hog@hexbear.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Now construct it manually, no geogebra this time

  source

  • blackbrook@mander.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Settle down, geolzebub.

    source
• something_random_tho@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Plato boutta flip the table.

  source
• Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  The angle of the arc in degrees is (180π-90)/π², or if you’re a person of culture, the angle is (2π-1)/2π

  source

  • jdeath@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    so that doesn’t seem like 90 but I’m just guessing

    source

    • propter_hog@hexbear.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      That angle doesn’t count. It’s just for constructing the straight lines; it’s not part of the “square”.

      source
• Agent641@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Where are the broad, flat fingernals tho?

  source
• Admetus@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Could be a square in a two dimensional space with different rules.

  source
• Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  You’re testing me, yo. An I’m bout to fail.

  source
• Zagorath@aussie.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Does this even meet the criteria for “a shape”? I’d have thought you need to be able to travel from any point within the shape to any other point, without crossing a line.

  source

  • saltesc@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    The part showing the angle is not part of it. They should’ve made it a dotted line or something.

    Image

    source

    • HaleHirsute@infosec.pub ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Thank you that was helpful.

      source