tetris11
@tetris11@lemmy.ml
- Comment on What your coffee preparation method says about you 1 day ago:
And then Android is a Starbucks cup.
That does Android a huge disservice. Android is a well made Nescafe. It’s not the coffee of your choice, but it is stable and reliable, and doesn’t make a fuss if you pour other coffees into it.
- Comment on What your coffee preparation method says about you 1 day ago:
That’s just pretentious, man. You do that for the musafir but there’s no way you use that impossible to clean cezve on a daily basis.
Here, use this:
A teaspoon for every little cup of water. Heat it fast until it simmers, stir like crazy for two minutes, let it froth slightly, pour.
- Comment on What your coffee preparation method says about you 1 day ago:
Oh I see, you enjoy licking the boot of Big Tea…
(yes im joking)
- Comment on Withdrawal is going to make people go mad 3 days ago:
They were definitely just going to protect the natives, that’s the lovable British empire that I know
- Comment on Withdrawal is going to make people go mad 3 days ago:
Nah. Environment needs to pay
- Comment on To deter predators... 3 days ago:
Oh, interesting!
- Comment on To deter predators... 4 days ago:
Alright you lost me here
- Comment on Know Nut November 1 week ago:
Round #2
- Comment on US Democracy 1 week ago:
Didn’t all the founding fathers and every president since then say all of the above?
We need to praise people more by what they do, than what they say I reckon
- Comment on your mom falls significantly faster than g 1 week ago:
and Diet light-blue weighs less than light-blue
- Comment on your mom falls significantly faster than g 1 week ago:
Exactly, red has way more up-quarks than blue
- Comment on pump up the jamz 1 week ago:
It shouldn’t be overlooked that the initials of the song as PUTJ, which was the Myers-Brigg personality type (problematic-unfettered-thoughtful-judgemental) of the lead singer who was combating Foot-In-Mouth disease at the time.
- Comment on pump up the jamz 1 week ago:
Thou hath shod
- Comment on pump up the jamz 1 week ago:
That’s true, but you shouldn’t forget that there is a large part of it that goes dudududuuuu dudududududuuuuu dudududududuuu dudududududuuuu
- Comment on pump up the jamz 1 week ago:
I’m actually surprised you got so many up votes for that level of technical correctness. This is a tough room
- Comment on pump up the jamz 1 week ago:
Each “Doo” could level a forest
- Comment on Anon awakens an ancient evil 1 week ago:
www.madankles.net
- Comment on WILD 1 week ago:
What of they get yeeted?
- Comment on I just need to keep it steady 2 weeks ago:
oh neat, TMBG! I’m seeing them live on Sunday
- Comment on I just need to keep it steady 2 weeks ago:
It’s 1995!
And, now that I’m older,
stress weighs on my shoulders - Comment on Please be patient. 2 weeks ago:
For fuck sake Pauli, stop trying to smush it in the palm of your hand!
- Comment on anon working as behaviour interventionist 2 weeks ago:
Similar situation growing up. I asked my mum once how she coped with it all, and her answer still freaks me out sometimes.
She said she didn’t know she was a person who had choices, or could think about the situation she was in. She just did as she was expected to.
She’s in her 60s now and is far more in tune with her emotions, thoughts and feelings than I remember her when I was a kid.
Can you just imagine? Being virtually catatonic in autopilot most of your life, because no one encouraged you to live? It chills me.
I watched Westworld recently, and I can definitely draw some parallels behind the theory of a bicameral mind it hints at, where automatons slowly start to awaken and take control of the voice in their head telling them to do things…
- Comment on Womp womp 3 weeks ago:
“We enjoyed the discussion in which the author disseminated the fallout from vanquishing their foes, but we found their choice of method (‘Block out the Sun’) derivative of prior work ('Burns et al, 2005’) without citation.”
- Comment on Half as Hot 3 weeks ago:
My entire argument rests on the premise that 0°C is a rational start point for both C and F, but I concede that halving something doesn’t explain absolute changes
- Comment on Half as Hot 3 weeks ago:
I agree that the numbers should just speak for themselves
Cutting 70°C in half is by definition -101.5°C
I’d argue here that no one would make this leap nor mental calculation, and most people would just divide X by 2 and gauge what the resulting Y is based on their familiarity with the weather. If it’s 30 / 2 = 15, people would think “Huh, 15 is pretty cool compared to room temperature ~ 20ish , that’s significant”. If it’s 90 / 2 = 45, people would think “Huh, both 90 and 45 are pretty hot, but it seems like a meaningful reduction nonetheless.”
I dunno, maybe I’m overexplaining this
- Comment on Half as Hot 3 weeks ago:
But °C was mentioned in the units, and its well understood that 0°C is a cold temperature for humans.
I’m not a fan of marketing doublespeak either, but I think the right scale and right terminology was used here. They cut the temperature on half, in Celsius, on the basis that 0°C is very cold.
- Comment on Eat lead 3 weeks ago:
There’s a fun belief in physics regarding this “superdeterminism”.
It essentially states that two entangled particles exhibit entanglement not because of any property between them but because they share the same cause origin point (the big bang) and that their respective spin states correlate more with the big bang than each other. Essentially the spin experiments will always appear to show entanglement, but it’s actually a byproduct of the big bang.
Which, as we can all maybe agree, is fucking weak.
- Comment on Eat lead 3 weeks ago:
Look I don’t like them either, but you can’t refer to crusty bishops that way
- Comment on Get good. 3 weeks ago:
Ma?
- Comment on So bad it was actually entertaining 3 weeks ago:
Owner destroyed by this logical fallacy
