blackbrook
@blackbrook@mander.xyz
- Comment on Actors that have been the least believable scientist castings, I’ll start. 5 days ago:
RFK jr?
- Comment on Actors that have been the least believable scientist castings, I’ll start. 5 days ago:
To be fair, he’s just as unbelievable playing anyone with an average IQ.
- Comment on Working Overtime at the Disease Factory 5 days ago:
Seriously! When I put in an order for a plague, I don’t want to get sent an inadequately infectious one.
- Comment on When life gives ya lemons. 1 week ago:
Lemon x mexican (key) lime
- Comment on He was a snacc 1 week ago:
I don’t understand the “drag off” part. They don’t eat them where they found them? Why?
- Comment on Don't we all? 2 weeks ago:
You can tell what type a base pair is by listening to the tone it makes, but it’s very quiet so you need a stethoscope.
- Comment on Don't we all? 2 weeks ago:
If you hold the picture upside down the dna spirals the right way.
- Comment on cursed knowledge 3 weeks ago:
Not a great day for having eyes.
- Comment on Let's get Physical 4 weeks ago:
What was that claim? And is there some equivalent of TLDR I can preemptively use about whatever news coverage contains this info which I don’t want to look up and wish to ignore if I eventually come across it?
- Comment on electrostatic spider flight 4 weeks ago:
But how common are windless conditions, really? It seems incredibly rare that there would be so little air movement that the effect of it wouldn’t far overwhelm the electrostatic effect. I’m no meteorologist, though.
- Comment on Panama Proxima 4 weeks ago:
Sorry I was being unecessary obnoxious. I just meant they could have written it saying “this could happen” rather than presenting it as “this will happen.”
I’m just really triggered lately with everything online being exaggerated for clicks.
- Comment on Panama Proxima 4 weeks ago:
The English language has words and grammar for speculation, “will” is not one of them.
- Comment on Dik Piks 4 weeks ago:
Words were considered slurs even before there were social consequences for using them.
- Comment on Dik Piks 4 weeks ago:
Damn, those noods are practcally naked! Come to think of it, it’s that they are not quite naked that makes them so hot.
- Comment on Dik Piks 4 weeks ago:
Always include a self-addressed, stamped envelope.
- Comment on Microwave Intensifies 4 weeks ago:
It’s a fake photograph. It’s actually a woodcut cleverly done to mimic one. It’s quite good, you can hardly make out the crosshatching.
- Comment on It's just loss. 4 weeks ago:
Clearly Big Invertabrate was behind this.
- Comment on Caption this. 5 weeks ago:
When your brain explodes out your other ear, you don’t want to be getting any in your eyes. Also, its not a plug, it just ties them to the table so you don’t steal them.
- Comment on rude. 5 weeks ago:
Scientists have been known to be materialist.
- Comment on it's a war out there 5 weeks ago:
Gorm!
- Comment on Fun bites 1 month ago:
Humerous rant or not it seems reasonable to assume its basic claims about the animal are factual. It seems really fucked up to make shit up about an animal in order to rant about it.
- Comment on Cursed 1 month ago:
Well yes, and what it means for “there to be things” is a whole discussion in itself. But the concepts of space and time are rather deep and fundamental (to our mental models regardless of how or if that maps to objective reality). The preference for right angles is much less fundamental and we can see past and get over it.
- Comment on Cursed 1 month ago:
All this should tell us is that we have a strong irrational preference for right angles being aligned with each other.
- Comment on ☀️ Hellbender Summer ☀️ 1 month ago:
Could somebody point out where the safe rocks are?
- Comment on Spidey Senses 1 month ago:
I would guess it’s to fool their prey.
- Comment on Some worms have bones. 1 month ago:
TIL: worms are metal.
- Comment on Happy Birthday John Turkey 1 month ago:
I get and appreciate that joke. I actually meant the last phrase of the quote (the unintended irony of my question’s vagueness now noted!), “which can always be made more precise.”
- Comment on Custodians 1 month ago:
Because we’re anxious about our investments in soylent green.
- Comment on Happy Birthday John Turkey 1 month ago:
What exactly is that last phrase supposed to modify? I find that syntax confusing. Is that ironic or intentional?
- Comment on Make dinosaurs weirder 1 month ago:
I don’t think you can prove that people can’t do something well, by doing it yourself poorly.
“Look how humorously badly I keep missing the target! See? Sharpshooters could never hit something like this at this distance!”