blackbrook
@blackbrook@mander.xyz
- Comment on Fucking idiots 4 hours ago:
You call that counterpoint? Bach’s Mass in D minor. Now that’s counterpoint!
- Comment on I will be taking no followup questions. Thank you for your time 1 week ago:
A light spirit lives in the battery. It reaches out across the wires until it reaches the round window which it uses to show its power.
- Comment on An apple a day, ... Ah well, fuck it. 1 week ago:
“regardless of texture physics…” If I had been drinking milk when I read that, it would definitely have come out my nose!
- Comment on Mid Career Marine Biology 1 week ago:
Never mess with someone trained in gorilla warfare. Those gorillas don’t mess around.
- Comment on Dawg... 1 week ago:
Risky click of the day
- Comment on Dawg... 1 week ago:
I agree with all the comments here, but also, now I’m craving hotdogs.
- Comment on An apple a day, ... Ah well, fuck it. 1 week ago:
However many is fatal.
- Comment on What kind of locomotion is that? What is the evolutionary advantage? 1 week ago:
Example of content evolution.
- Comment on Don't forget to turn purple and remove your arms 1 week ago:
Could you explain what you mean by laying at an angle?
- Comment on What do you think the PPE is for 1 week ago:
Well it seems lazy. And I think elements of accurate realness in contrast to the twist in a cartoon make it funnier.
It also bothers me that they are using the wrong definition of ‘mad’ for the joke. I think it was easier to find a word for a milder version of that ‘mad’, but it detracts from it for me.
- Comment on Don't forget to turn purple and remove your arms 1 week ago:
Doesn’t that put your back into a curve? I feel like that would kill my lower back, but maybe I don’t know how to use a hammock properly.
- Comment on Don't forget to turn purple and remove your arms 1 week ago:
Maybe if it was a small enough pillow? That picture looks exaggerated. Their ears certainly aren’t what I would call over their shoulders.
- Comment on 2 weeks ago:
And only a fraction of those are jelly filled.
- Comment on Missing banana for scale. 2 weeks ago:
Oh, sure, no disagreement from me on that. But this looks to me like something from a magazine, so one expects some level of professionalism. Now if this is some 12 year old’s fanzine or something, ok, I feel bad for giving them shit, but a professional journalist should be embarrassed.
- Comment on Missing banana for scale. 2 weeks ago:
In case I wasn’t clear about this in my other reply, my main point is that a photo of something fake is not the same thing add as a fake photo. If the dinosaur is animatronic, it’s not a fake photo. If the dinosaur is CGI, yeah fake photo.
- Comment on Missing banana for scale. 2 weeks ago:
See my reply to the other reply to my comment.
- Comment on Missing banana for scale. 2 weeks ago:
No, this is sloppy use of language, which worked the same 50 years ago. The only thing different today is the range of things that exist that we can infer that they really mean by their sloppy language. There were still ways to manipulate photos, before CGI. One might have called such a manipulated photo a ‘fake photograph’ in that day (though even that is arguably a little sloppy). But a non manipulated photo of a real physical model is not in any way a ‘fake photograph’. You could say a photograph of a fake Gigantopithecus, or of a fake scene but that’s not the same thing. Yes, we can infer what’s meant when people carelessly slap adjectives on the wrong nouns, but it is sloppy writing.
Notice how much more accurate and well written OP’s description is: “Paleo-anthro sculptor Bill Munns with his Giganto reconstruction”
- Comment on Missing banana for scale. 2 weeks ago:
Caption writer seems to be confused about what a real photograph is and what conceptual means.
- Comment on proof of wormholes 3 weeks ago:
Listen I know the RFK claim is nonsense but that doesn’t excuse faulty logic. This is like saying cancer existed before X so X can’t be a carcinogen.
- Comment on be gay, do crimes (in space) 3 weeks ago:
Best band name ever.
- Comment on smol 3 weeks ago:
That’s one spicy meatball.
- Comment on Can't argue that. 3 weeks ago:
With my own father and some others I know, I feel like the problem is less with being unable to learn new things then with being unable to unlearn things either which are no longer valid, or which were never valid but it should have become increasing obvious.
- Comment on Can't argue that. 3 weeks ago:
Well the ‘myth’ you speak of is based on the fact that the opposite of what you describe is also true. Those who lose any interest in learning new things become progressively more rigid and stuck in their mindset and become less and less likely to learn or adapt as they age. I suspect there are more people leaning towards that than lifelong learners, but I may just be a pessimist.
- Comment on tall tails 5 weeks ago:
If you take out the word ‘completely’ you’ve got it.
- Comment on The Woofstream 1 month ago:
Or maybe viralness is just proportional to stupid and so the stupid ones simply get copied and reencoded lossily more.
- Comment on Good news. :) 1 month ago:
Who else could offer more distraction?
- Comment on STRAIGHT 2 JAIL 1 month ago:
I have no idea of this person is expert enough to tell the difference, but there are loon species in Europe that sound pretty similar to the common loon.
- Comment on 🦈🦈🦈 1 month ago:
How do any of these sharks function without a cloaca?!?
- Comment on KATHLEEN 1 month ago:
Katy is also kinda-sorta-not-really short for Kathleen. It’s short for Katherine.
- Comment on Actors that have been the least believable scientist castings, I’ll start. 2 months ago:
RFK jr?