Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

It is very therapeutic to garden, though.

⁨912⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today⁩ to ⁨science_memes@mander.xyz⁩

https://lemmy.today/pictrs/image/d8a4329a-6092-4cc3-97e5-f629938186c5.png

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • Roldyclark@literature.cafe ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Some stuff you can def grow yourself easily and not have to buy at the store. I don’t have to buy tomato’s all summer just from a few plants. Never buy herbs. But yeah sustenance farming I am not. Support local farmers!

    source
    • BakerBagel@midwest.social ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Local farm has a dirt cheap produce subscription. $40 a week for locally grown produce!

      source
      • fushuan@lemm.ee ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        That’s super expensive… 40 a week for just veggies? I spend 40 a week on all my groceries at most.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Surplusable farming is literally the basis on which all civilization is built

    Like the whole point of the way things work for us now is that you don’t have to be a farmer or a hunter or a gatherer to be able to have access to a consistent source of food.

    source
    • ashok36@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Also the fact that one bad year in your tiny part of the world means you and everyone you know die slow agonizing deaths. Fun!

      source
      • Socsa@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        This is also a major point of livestock. If you have more produce than you can eat, feed the excess to some animals and they will keep those calories fresh and delicious over the winter.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        This is part of the reason why early farming was so inefficient. Have a plot up the hill, have one in the valley, grow multiple crops, etc etc.

        That’s not done to have more food, that’s done so you don’t die when something bad happens.

        source
    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      This is one of the things I find funny about modern day self sufficient communes. Subsistence farming is awful, industrialized farming is less awful, but still far more work than most are willing to ever do.

      source
      • Croquette@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        The issue is that the current farming techniques are not sustainable.

        The fertilizers and pesticides used are burning the land, polluting the underground water pools and killing a bunch of animals and insects.

        The agriculture needs to change to something sustainable.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        In theory, some of those communes are cool. Way less wasteful than suburban living arrangements.

        But I do worry about those communes, honestly. The demographics they attract are easy to abuse: aging conspiracy theorists with low education. If the commune owns the land, or even worse if an individual owns the land, then those people could be forced to leave and become homeless. Even if they did own property in the commune, it might be able to act as an HOA or local township and start charging them until they can claim the property that way.

        source
    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      The Agricultural Revolution was a trap

      source
    • Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Q: what does a subsistence farmer do when something goes wrong?

      A: they die.

      source
    • freebee@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      There’s still different approaches to it though. The default industrial gigantic monocultures with massive aquifer drilling is for sure missing a few delayed, less visible costs in the equation. “Improve industrial farming, adjust it back to a more normal scale and add some diversity between the fields and rotate crops!” just isn’t a very catchy slogan I guess.

      source
  • mozz@mbin.grits.dev ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Fun fact: IDK about like a backyard vegetable garden, but small family-sized farms are actually more productive per unit of land than big industrial agriculture.

    The farming conglomerates like to enforce big farming operations because they're easier to mechanize and run at scale. But if your goal is just to produce food and have the farmers make a living, small farms are actually better even economically (in addition to like 10 other reasons).

    source
    • lgmjon64@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Also, you can’t just look at the amount of food produced, but the amount produced vs waste, storage and transportation costs. Most things in the garden can stay ripe on the plant for a while and can be picked as needed.

      Anecdotally, we were supplying about 80% of our fruit and veg needs on our own garden plot on our standard city residential lot with a family of 7. And we were literally giving tomatoes, citrus and zucchini away as fast as we could.

      source
    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      This article about the study:

      Aragón conducted a study on farm productivity of more than 4,000 farming households in Uganda over a five-year period. The study considered farm productivity based on land, labour and tools as well as yields per unit area of cultivated land. His findings suggested that even though yields were higher for smaller farms, farm productivity was actually higher for larger farms. Similar research in Peru, Tanzania and Bangladesh supported these findings.

      And then the Actual Study HERE:

      What explains these divergent findings? Answering this question is important given its consequential policy implications. If small farms are indeed more productive, then policies that encourage small landholdings (such as land redistribution) could increase aggregate productivity (see the discussion in Collier and Dercon, 2014).

      We argue that these divergent results reflect the limitation of using yields as a measure of productivity. Our contribution is to show that, in many empirical applications, yields are not informative of the size-productivity relationship, and can lead to qualitatively different insights. Our findings cast doubts on the interpretation of the inverse yield-size relationship as evidence that small farms are more productive, and stress the need to revisit the existing empirical evidence.

      Meaning the author is advocating for more scrutiny against the claim and against land redistribution as a policy stance with the intention of increasing productivity.

      First, farmers have small scale operations (the average cultivated area is 2.3 hectares).

      The definition of “small family farms” in this case is on average more than 5 acres, which would absolutely be under the umbrella of subsidized industrial agriculture in developed nations.

      source
      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        5 acres is miniscule compared to conventional agriculture, at least in the US. So these aren’t backyard gardens but they are likely quite different from agribusiness as well.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • mozz@mbin.grits.dev ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Yeah, that's why I included "per unit of land." It is in practice a little more complex, and a lot of times the smaller farms are more labor-intensive.

        My opinion is that modern farming is efficient enough that we can very obviously sustain the farmer, and sell the food at a reasonable price, and it all works -- the only reason this is even complicated at all and we have to talk about optimizing for labor (certainly in 1st-world farms) is that we're trying to support a bloodsucking managerial class that demands six-figure salaries for doing fuck-all, and subsistence wages for the farmers and less than that for farmworkers, and stockholder dividends, and if we just fixed all that bullshit then the issue would be land productivity and everything would be fine.

        But yes, in terms of labor productivity it's a little more complex, and none of the above system I listed is likely to change anytime soon, so that's fair.

        source
  • Fenrisulfir@lemmy.ca ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Who the fuck prioritized efficiency over quality in their backyard garden?

    My handmade solid maple and walnut furniture will never reach the yield or cost-effectiveness as IKEA. I guess I’ll just have to burn my shop down

    source
    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      You are missing the point.

      It’s not about your shop. It’s about everyone making their own furniture… which doesn’t scale and isn’t feasible.

      source
      • enbyecho@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        This is a totally specious argument. Everyone doesn’t have to make 100% of their own furniture any more than every one has to grow 100% of their food.

        If I make two chairs it’s more efficient than 1 chair and I only need to spend maybe 70% more time than 1, not 100% I sell/barter one chair to my neighbor, who, because they have grown 6 tomato plants instead of 4 (at most 10% more of their labor), has excess tomatoes and gives me some in exchange.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • YeetPics@mander.xyz ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        It scaled and was feasible before the industrialization of production.

        I think you mean, you don’t want it to scale or be feasible.

        source
    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Who the fuck prioritized efficiency over quality in their backyard garden?

      The Billions of human beings who rely on it to live.

      source
      • meep_launcher@lemm.ee ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        I think the imperative phrase here is backyard garden. They aren’t referring to a 40 acre field of wheat and potatoes, they probably are thinking a 10’x10’ raised bed.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • Fenrisulfir@lemmy.ca ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        What exactly does homegrown produce mean for you?

        source
    • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Funny enough ‘efficiency’ industrially tends to just mean what makes the most money anyways, so most crop’s have been trained to be nutrient sparse, yet large

      source
  • captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    100% granted. In the 100 square feet of my property I set aside for vegetable gardening in my spare time, I cannot grow as much food as a full time professional farmer can in a given 100 square feet of a multi-acre field.

    I can, however, produce more food than the non-native species of turf grass that used to grow there.

    source
  • match@pawb.social ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    counterpoint: industrial agriculture exists mostly to sustain animal products

    source
    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      That’s a really good counterpoint.

      source
    • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Crops like soybeans are mostly cultivated for animal consumption, but are you sure it holds for the entirety of the industrial agriculture?

      source
    • sukhmel@programming.dev ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      You mean, compared to what goes to the market for people?

      I don’t eat much of not industrial agriculture products, even local farms only produce fruits, and I would say they are also industrial (not sure where is the line)

      source
      • Bademantel@feddit.de ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Cows and other farm animals need a lot of food:

        More than three-quarters of global agricultural land is used for livestock, despite meat and dairy making up a much smaller share of the world’s protein and calories.

        Source (OWID)

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • flora_explora@beehaw.org ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Not only that. But our agriculture is so centered around animals that we also have a huge surplus of manure (the animals’ feces, horn shavings, basically anything left of them) that we then use on all kinds of plant crops. It is so baked into the system that it will be a long way before we can really get a animal-free agriculture…

        source
    • flora_explora@beehaw.org ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      This is certainly true for our modern agriculture today. But is this really true for any possible industrial agriculture? Couldn’t we also have a plant based industrial agriculture leaving domesticated animals out of the equation altogether? Sure, we are a far way off from that. But I think it would be achievable and that we should aim for it.

      source
    • zeekaran@sopuli.xyz ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      The animal products are also just more industrial scale, subsidized farming, too.

      source
  • Cylusthevirus@kbin.social ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Why would home gardeners optimize for yield and cost effectiveness? They can't deploy automation or economies of scale.

    You garden at home because you enjoy the flavor, freshness, and variety. Those are the perks. Miss me with those mealy, flavorless grocery store tomatoes.

    source
    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I came to the realization earlier today that there are an alarming number of people who theorize that they can just live off homegrown and composting. They think they can challenge big agriculture by “going off the grid” and that society would be better without subsidized industrial farming.

      That’s why they would optimize for yield and cost effectiveness. They think they can compete.

      source
      • xor@infosec.pub ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        man, you’re going to be really alarmed when you hear about community gardens and greenhouses…

        the idea for most people isn’t to completely replace all farming, but to reduce it, grow food instead of a lawn, have some fresh delicious non-gmo shit…
        have something to fall back on when the nuclear apocalypse happens…

        industrial farming will never be as nutritious, delicious, or satisfying as home-grown…

        p.s. working with soil has natural antidepressant properties…

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • mister_monster@monero.town ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Absolutely you can compete my dude. Just not if you’re doing it commercially. If you have the space you can grow everything you need and save a ton of money.

        The problem is everyone can’t do that. It doesn’t scale. To feed 8 billion you need the big ag machine. But you, yourself, if you want to focus your time and effort on digging in the soil instead of being a corporate cog, can absolutely support your needs for very cheap.

        source
      • BakerBagel@midwest.social ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        How northern are we talking? Our tomatoes didn’t so well last year in Northern Ohio, but the summer before i was absolutely drowning in cherry tomatoes!

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • __Lost__@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I don’t understand why anyone would argue against a garden. Should my yard just be grass? Why shouldn’t I plant something I can eat in it? It doesn’t matter if it’s less efficient than industrial farming, it’s basically unused land to start with.

    source
    • phoenixz@lemmy.ca ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      That’s because nobody is arguing that. The argument is against people saying that industrial farming is evil and should be stopped, which is a bit of a past time hobby around here.

      source
      • ZMoney@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Monoculture is terrible for the ecosystem. Fertilizer runoff causes algal blooms and dead zones in the ocean. Multinational agricultural conglomerates force developing world farmers to purchase their GMO seeds sue them for copyright infingement if they try to use their seed stock in the next season. Rainforests are being burned down to make room for pastures of methane emitting cattle and monocultured palm oil plantations. The Haber-Bosch process is responsible for 5% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Should I go on? At what point am I supposed to like this?

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Right?

        it’s no different than the yahoos who they they would run the govt better. then they try and give up because it’s ‘too hard’. this is basically the same as soveign citizen BS, but with vegetables instead of guns.

        but we can’t let a complex reality get in the way of our well-intention delusions of smugness. because apparently if every citizen isn’t providing themselve wiht their own fruits and vegetables… it’s their complicity with corporations… or something.

        source
    • Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Should my yard just be grass?

      Definitely not!

      Why shouldn’t I plant something I can eat in it?

      Because a terrifyingly large percentage of soil is very polluted, and really isn’t suitable for growing food. If you eat a lot of homegrown food, getting the soil tested for (at least) heavy metals is probably a good idea, especially if you have little kids or pregnant people.

      source
      • grubberfly@mander.xyz ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        how/where do tests for soil are made? didnt know i had to check for that here in Mx.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • Crikeste@lemm.ee ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      They have to defend capitalism and the idea that overproduction is good, regardless of the waste.

      They simply don’t care, about anything but money.

      source
    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I don’t understand why anyone would argue against a garden.

      I don’t understand why anyone thinks I ever argued against a garden.

      source
  • enbyecho@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I ran commercially successful regenerative farms for many years. Here is the shocking truth Corporate Jesus ™ didn’t want you to know:

    You aren’t “competing” on price or quantity. You are competing on quality. Quality in taste, quality in freshness which also means quality in nutrition^ and quality in sustainability.

    So… it might cost you a bit more in money and/or time to grow food in your garden but you are getting so much more value out of it. That’s the yield and that’s the cost effectiveness.

    That’s massively more efficient than subsidizing huge-scale industrial agriculture so that some giant corporation can yield higher profits. In fact, come to think of it, shouldn’t home gardens be subsidized?

    • ^ E.g. 90% of vitamin C in spinach is lost after 72 hours from harvest*
    source
    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      home gardening requires time and land.

      It’s largely a privilege for those who have both. not a solution for the economically depressed who have neither.

      source
      • enbyecho@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        It’s largely a privilege for those who have both. not a solution for the economically depressed who have neither.

        I’m pretty sure that’s what Corporate Jesus would want people to believe. And to be honest, sometimes labeling something as “privileged” is just another way of reinforcing that thinking. It doesn’t have to be that way.

        1. Gardening does not require much time relative to the value of the output. Many new gardeners will say “oh but it’s so time consuming” because they are still learning and make lots of mistakes. If you have your systems up and running and your processes down, it’s a fraction of the actual value produced and is extremely efficient. Don’t get me started or I will go on about this in extreme nerdy detail from personal experience.
        2. Collective action can massively increase both the availability of suitable land and the output relative to any one individual’s effort. An obvious example of this is community gardens such as the Gill Tract in Albany, CA. If Occupy the Farm had been better supported we the people could have had the whole thing, but there still is a large garden available for use by neighboring houses. And there are community gardens and vacant land waiting to be community gardens everywhere. It just takes folks to say they can do it to make it happen.

        A key component in this is a general misunderstanding of the value of your labor. When you garden you retain 100% of the value of your labor and your time is worth much more. When you work for others and then have to pay for food at a significant markup, you are losing a very large proportion of that labor. This is one of the central lies of capitalism that forces you into wage slavery and promotes false narratives like “growing food is most efficient on a huge scale”. Efficient to whom? Not to you.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • zazo@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        that’s why OP was suggesting we subsidize home (and I’d add allotment) gardens - give people money to plant food and flowers and they’ll be better of f both physically and mentally.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • NegativeInf@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Hell yea! Let’s bring back victory gardens! With a subsidy!

      source
  • EunieIsTheBus@feddit.de ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Is probably true. However, one should question their world view if they measure everything as a minimization problem with respect to cost efficience and yield.

    source
    • Donkter@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I think it’s less about ruthless efficiency and more about which system will enable even the poorest in society to have nutritious food.

      source
      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        as if this system has done so…

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • enbyecho@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      if they measure everything as a minimization problem with respect to cost efficience and yield.

      Well to be fair, that 3rd home in the Hamptons and a bigger yacht are not going to pay for themselves.

      source
  • blazera@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    The more you grow and eat at home, the less the food industry needs to burn fuel to ship. I know you folks in the US hate doing anything to help out with the world, but if you took the saying of be the change you want to see, imagine the tens of millions of acres being wasted on lawns being put to environmental and nutritional use. Imagine instead of putting leaves into plastic bags to get shipped to a landfill, or burning, houses normalized having compost piles. You get to put waste paper and cardboard in there too instead of bagging it.

    I challenge all of yall to grow beans this season. They grow fast, they grow easy, theyre pretty nutritionally complete, they fertilize your soil themselves. Make use of your land.

    source
    • SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Yup we shoud normalize gardening and canning. It’s a thing my grandparents knew. Their families survived times of world wars, dust bowls and the great depression. They probably didn’t have much choice in the moment but even when times got better they kept up a wonderful little garden. Kid me didn’t get why they didn’t just buy the things they needed.

      I love the conveniences of modern farming and I use it every day. But like all big industialized systems they can be fragile. Covid was a huge problem for a lot of indistries and thankfully farming wasn’t really one of them. But if it was countless people would have struggled.

      I’m not really a prepper or anything crazy but I don’t want to forget the lessons learned just a few decades ago- gardening is great and worth the effort.

      source
    • GBU_28@lemm.ee ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      What a bullshit blanket rude comment. Lots of folks in the US are working hard to affect change at their personal and local level. You should edit your comment because it’s nationalistic and disparaging.

      source
      • KidnappedByKitties@lemm.ee ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        A picture of emissions per capita

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • blazera@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Nah Americans need to do better

        source
    • Aceticon@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      It makes sense for it to be the same as solar power: just because most of energy generation is done in big facilities and even some kinds of solar generation (such as solar concentrators) can only be done in large facilities, doesn’t make having some solar panels providing part of one’s needs (or even all of one’s needs for some of the time) less cost effective in Economic terms or a good thing in Ecologic terms.

      So it makes sense to raise some of one’s food, but maybe not raise one’s own beef or even aim for food self sufficiency, both for personnal financial reasons and health reasons. That it’s also good in Ecological terms (can lower the use of things like pesticides and definitelly reduces transportation needs) is just icing on the cake.

      source
      • blazera@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Im pretty sure the easy decentralization of solar is a big reason its gotten so much pushback from politicians and lobbyists.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Imagine instead of putting leaves into plastic bags to get shipped to a landfill, or burning, houses normalized having compost piles.

      I appreciate your argument but there’s no need to throw in a strawman. Leaves in plastic bags have been illegal in most US states for decades. Yard waste must be in paper bags.

      source
      • blazera@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Ive never seen yard waste in a paper bag, I have seen loads of plastic bags. pumpkin faces for autumn are extremely popular here.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
  • GarlicToast@programming.dev ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    It may be true for ‘soldier’ plants. However there are thousands of plant species that can’t be both efficiently mass produced and shipped while still being of good quality. So you get a bad produce, very costly produce or both.

    I can’t afford fresh Basil leaves, I maintained a plant in my kitchen in some of the apartments I lived in. The current one doesn’t have enough sun. It took 10 minutes of work to arrange and emptying left over water.

    Also, if you never tasted cherry tomatoes straight from the plant you don’t what you are missing, and how shity is the produce in the market.

    source
    • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I can’t afford fresh Basil leaves, I maintained a plant in my kitchen in some of the apartments I lived in. The current one doesn’t have enough sun. It took 10 minutes of work to arrange and emptying left over water.

      The basil plants you buy in grocery stores are designed to die after a while. It’s not lack of sun or water, it’s because there are just way too many plants in the tiny pot and basil does not like to be root-bound. They basically strangle themselves to death.

      You can easily propagate the plant through cuttings or you can separate the grown plants and re-pot them in smaller groups.

      source
      • GarlicToast@programming.dev ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Yea, I had Basil im some apartments. The current one has no sun at-all. Basil needs some. But when I bought plants my father guided me how to split them. Gifted my friends, don’t need more then one.

        source
    • Swallowtail@beehaw.org ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I used to hate tomatoes, then I tried home-grown and just realized grocery store tomatoes often suck by comparison. There are many plants that don’t store/ship well so you either can’t get them in stores (e.g. pawpaws) or they taste bad because of short shelf life/bruising.

      source
      • GarlicToast@programming.dev ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        TIL about pawpaws, thanks.

        source
  • Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Agree, but also do plant something that you’ll use just a small amount from time to time, like herbs, spices, scallion, chive, and so on. Thing that you’ll want it fresh but you can never use it all before it compost. Don’t even need a garden, just plant it in pot.

    I have screwpine leaf, lemon grass, coriander, and scallion in my garden, and i can harvest the onion when i need it.

    source
  • Steak@lemmy.ca ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I smoke a lot of weed. Always have. Last year I grew 4 plants in my backyard garden and this year I’ve saved thousands of dollars on weed. It’s not as strong as store stuff but you get used to to it quickly and there’s less paranoia with homegrown I find. I’m always gonna grow my own weed from now on. Only reason I didn’t before was that it was illegal. This year I germinated 3 seeds but only one took so I’ll have one super tall pot plant in my backyard haha.

    source
  • Mango@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    The thing about it is that I’m keeping the benefit of the cost effectiveness myself instead of some farmers and taking heads elsewhere. It’s more efficient per dollar for ME.

    source
  • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    no shit you can’t compete with something subsidized lol, how is that an impressive argument?

    just… subsidize the homegrown produce if you want it to be competitive? big brain moment

    source
  • TORFdot0@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Home gardening is an important element of individual food security. It’s not meant to replace industrial agriculture which maintains food security for the nation as a whole

    source
  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    'Cost effectives’ when not counting all the costs of monoculturing all the things.

    source
  • Delonix@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    It’s better to encourage native fauna by planting native flora than plant a vegetable garden that you give up on after 2 months and then gets overrun with foreign weeds.

    source
  • pineapplelover@lemm.ee ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Went to a local farmers’ market over the weekend. Everything was very good, y’all should give it a try

    source
  • Blackout@kbin.run ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Have you tasted store bought vegetables? Farmers market may be grown, may be store bought. I have 2 4x2ft planters full of veggies, out $200 this year setting it up. Next year just the price of seeds.

    source
  • ummthatguy@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Image

    source
  • recklessengagement@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    You’re getting a lot of hate here, but you’re not entirely wrong. Cost aside, home gardens are massively more carbon intensive than modern industrial agricultural methods. Community gardens are generally better.

    phys.org/…/2024-01-food-urban-agriculture-carbon-…

    That said, gardens do still offer a ton of other benefits, both for your mental health and your taste buds. But let’s not completely decentralize our agricultural system.

    source
  • harmsy@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Last year I bought a packet of sugar pumpkin seeds just because I thought the flowers looked nice the previous time I’d tried (and failed) to grow pumpkins. Got plenty of pumpkins out of it, saved some of the seeds, and started buying butternut squash when the pumpkins ran out. Saved the seeds from those, too, and now I’ve got seedlings of both popping up. I’m gonna have so much pie!

    source
  • MechanicalJester@lemm.ee ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Sometimes. You cannot go to a store and buy the freshest, most mouth watering and delicious fruits because they cannot handle being shipped even locally.

    A warm, juicy peach right off the tree is an amazing experience.

    Also, you know 100% of what what was and what wasn’t done to your stuff.

    That said, I don’t have the time or will to grow all my own veggies that I like daily.

    I can, however make enough other stuff that’s saleable so I can afford fresh veg year round.

    source
  • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    it’s therapeutic and it helps - fucking cucumbers are just co2 and a few random minerals from the soil my man, grow that shit, it’s easy af

    source
  • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    But it doesn’t need to have a better overall yeld or lower price. It can work as a complementary production, to bring variety, resiliency, and protect local crops and pollinators.

    source
  • eightforty@lemmy.world ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Did Nestle posted this?

    source
  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Although I have certainly mentioned that 40+ acres are required to sustain a family agriculturally I believe that it is still worth it to grow food and herb and spices. Just don’t expect it to change the direction of inflation.

    source
  • crispyflagstones@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Counterpoint: if you, personally, can save some dollars so you’re mainly spending on the things you can’t grow, that’s hardly a bad thing. Also, working with soil is known to be good for you. Exposes you to soil bacteria that are known to boost mood.

    And it sounds corny as fuck and I didn’t really take it seriously until I did it, but homegrown produce can be so incredibly much better than what you get off an industrial farm.

    Just let people feed themselves and be happy, fuck.

    source
-> View More Comments