Evil_Shrubbery
@Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
- Comment on Finale drops on Saturday 16 hours ago:
Don’t talk to be or my family unless you never played League of Legends
- Comment on Mars' Leaky Nipple 17 hours ago:
We would pave it with parking lots in no time!!
We can’t stand shit like that.
- Comment on Ahahah, it's too late Batman, I've already released an uncountable amount of PFAS into Gotham's water supply! 1 day ago:
WaynePFASdumping ltd. & its subsidiaries created most villains, just so that the rich kid can have his hobby.
What are the lives of an entire city compared to the whims of the elite?
- Comment on Anon preps for a hurricane 2 days ago:
Anon is in a riot.
Anon is in a reoccurring movie bit.
Anon attempted manslaughter with dad.
Anons dad comes back from store.
Anon eats all the hurricane good before the hurricane. - Comment on If Open Source is so great... 2 days ago:
Closed sauce app isn’t always better, and big corp don’t have ‘all stars’ teams (but do have marketing teams) - the question is why the fossy app doesn’t change UI designs every few months (mostly in stupid ways) :D.
- Comment on Day 124 of posting a Daily Screenshot from the games I’ve been playing until I forget to post Screenshots 2 days ago:
They textured instead of polygoned/tessellated/bumpmapped. The 2D doesn’t logically match the 3D. Idk, it’s weird, like a hasty remaster.
- Comment on "I never asked for this" 2 days ago:
I can’t do it with a single hand, and I’m afraid I’ll rip it of with my prosthetic hand.
- Comment on This world is cruel… 2 days ago:
So a foreign manga reader that likes to work their wood whilst drawing furry pics from said manga, and travels to cons to display subsequent art - is the most irresistible person to women?
(Should probably think about doing some public garden porn photography tbh)That does make sense.
- Comment on BIOMES 3 days ago:
Not biomes but …
Cesspool is an acceptable nickname tho.
South wetlands is reserved only for the exceptionally hot individuals.
- Comment on Anon questions our energy sector 4 days ago:
Thats the thing, no mutations, not even in mice that live in burrows and have like a generation every two seconds. They even did a DNA study by comparing species to the ones not from that area and found no differences.
But the main thing they looked at is cancer rates/signs (ionising radiation causing random mutations resulting in cancer, not superpowers), thats why the mice focus (but the fauna there is thriving, the biggest are deer).
The radiation causing mutation is very theoretical in the sense that the chances if it happening and leading to problems (and DNA corrective measures) seem to be low in the sense that radiation levels needed for that will sooner cause tissue damages too.
There is still a lot we don’t know bcs there are so few nuclear accidents (and bomb test) sights to study, but the levels how we defined safe is way on the conservative side.
- Comment on Day 124 of posting a Daily Screenshot from the games I’ve been playing until I forget to post Screenshots 4 days ago:
They fucked a perfectly fine river :(
- Comment on never skip 5 days ago:
Perfect.
Lawns were always a mistake by human hubris & greed.
- Comment on Say it again, Dexter 5 days ago:
Ok, but dont whisper to anyone ‘omelette du frozen sabretooth kitten’ (with some fromage ofc).
- Comment on Say it again, Dexter 5 days ago:
(… but … but … I meant Dexter, the showrunners, voice actors etc)
- Comment on Anon questions our energy sector 5 days ago:
Bullshit. If you can get the same amount of reliable power by just slapping up some solar panels, wind turbines, and batteries, then obviously the cost is not insignificant.
I’m thinking in practical terms how that still doesn’t happen that often, humans allocate assets, humans don’t behave logically (behavioural economics).
Nothing ever is going to be perfect and efficient, solar panels might get through vast price volatilities as well, installation costs hand already soared.
Then, at the same time, they’ll ignore the most bone-headedly obvious cause of nuclear’s failure: it’s just too fucking expensive.
So why did we subsidised so much expensive oil infrastructure. And at higher cost of life.
Humans don’t make economic decisions rationally. - Comment on We have the best shaped states, don't we folks 5 days ago:
Kentucky
Fucked
Chicken - Comment on Anon questions our energy sector 5 days ago:
The local undertaker family tells the story about Bob and Jim once a week to the whole village (attendance is mandatory).
- Comment on Say it again, Dexter 5 days ago:
You joke but this def influenced my view of the world, and my ideals.
- Comment on I've got a double peen AMA 5 days ago:
I don’t know any Jacks :(.
Oh, you mean Mr RoadworksPowerDildo?
Aye, I’ll give it a try, thx.
- Comment on Anon questions our energy sector 5 days ago:
It feels like it is otherwise we wouldn’t possibly use it.
Imagine dangerous drilling, all the complex refining, the mass transpiration systems around the world moving billions of tonnes, etc. It’s stupid and complex. The system to enable it was somewhat forced & def forced to maintain it, it’s well documented actually.
- Comment on make it make sense 5 days ago:
Yes, thats where the god-money scam/loophole comes in!
He’s just gonna give it to himself!
- Comment on Say it again, Dexter 5 days ago:
Same.
Also still mystified by what women like to hear like that.
- Comment on I've got a double peen AMA 5 days ago:
Oh, they forgot the dildo hammer too.
You know, sometimes you got to hammer the thing in.
- Comment on Anon questions our energy sector 5 days ago:
certainly
- Comment on Anon questions our energy sector 5 days ago:
The same problems faced the oil industry too, with their drilling rigs & refineries, it’s just less in the media & more spread out (more projects).
Also 10s of billions is still insignificant for any power, transport, or healthcare infrastructure in the scheme of things - we have the money, we just don’t tax profit enough. And don’t talk about how the whole budget gets spent (private or public), where all the money actually goes, instead we get the highlighted cases everyone talks about.
- Comment on Anon questions our energy sector 5 days ago:
Reality can be anything anyone says, you just gotta believe it really hard.
And then repeat the
liereality in service to the ones than benefit from it. - Comment on Anon questions our energy sector 5 days ago:
You are saying we should be kinder to the less fortunate?
That’s a nice thought.
- Comment on Anon questions our energy sector 5 days ago:
Renewables once surpassed fossil fuels, until some brave knight killed all the windmills.
- Comment on Anon questions our energy sector 5 days ago:
Yeah, oil oiled the “green” anti-nuclear protests.
You can tell thats how it was because the cops didn’t beat them as much (or in some big cases at all) as they do even the most insignificant anti-oil protesters.
- Comment on Anon questions our energy sector 5 days ago:
The house burning probably happened more than one time too.