A lot of industrial produced food is cheap because of child, forced, and otherwise exploited labor (undocumented workers, for example). Heavily mechanized farming (mostly used for grains) is cheap because of the vast amount of fossil fuel “energy slaves” used. And that’s only cheap because the costs are externalized.
Anyways, growing your own food can definitely be cheaper than buying it. Of course, not if you start plants under lights, build raised beds and fill them with purchased soil, buy organic pelletized fertilizer, or stuff like that. It can be nearly free to grow your own food (if you don’t count the cost of your own labor) by saving seeds and intercepting materials from waste streams (wood chips, lawn clippings, manure, used coffee grounds, etc) to “feed your soil.”
ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 6 months ago
Given the sheer volume of food waste produced to begin with: it sure don’t have to be as ‘efficient’.
FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 6 months ago
A third of all food goes uneaten in the USA AT THE CONSUMER AND RETAIL LEVEL. It’s not going to waste on the farm, nor would that change from gardening on your own.
ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 6 months ago
Right, the yields of the industrialized farms are what go to waste. You dont need a level klof productivity that gers bottlenecked at what I’ll definely broadly and loosely as ‘distribution’–from a garden.