enbyecho
@enbyecho@lemmy.world
- Comment on An independent voter explains why they chose a moronic, oligarcho-fascist demagogue over Joe Biden (c. November 2020) [Day 58] 3 weeks ago:
“I wanted to be outraged and lose sleep daily. I need to yell at my computer and throw things at my TV in order to feel alive”
- Comment on Mmm kale 3 weeks ago:
This does not appear to be well known: kale really needs colder temperatures in order to taste best. It’s sweetest when it has been through a frost or two. Unfortunately that’s not always maximally profitable for Huge Giant Corporate farms and so your kale is grown in warmer temperatures and tends to be bitter.
On the plus side, it’s incredibly easy to grow yourself.
- Comment on I'm old 5 weeks ago:
It’s fake news. You gotta be careful with these internet “sources”. Do your research!
- Comment on Water addiction 5 weeks ago:
Hyponatremia is actually a thing. A very bad and dangerous thing.
- Comment on Funded in 5 minutes - the open source modular mini computer 'Pilet' is on Kickstarter 5 weeks ago:
Can you explain to me how pointing out that this device seems oddly pointless - not unlike several other people - is “toxic”?
- Comment on Funded in 5 minutes - the open source modular mini computer 'Pilet' is on Kickstarter 1 month ago:
Y’all know we have these things called smartphones right? And laptops?
Some are even open hardware.
- Comment on "Free" Speech Absolutist™ 1 month ago:
What momentum?
- Comment on I wanna ROCK 1 month ago:
In only seems like rocks are brighter when you are dumber than a rock.
- Comment on These dames wanting inclusivity 1 month ago:
Actually women have superior rights during divorce, in the western world anyway. Try to keep the children as a man during divorce.
Found the incel. Please donate my prize money to any organization that supports passing the ERA.
- Comment on These dames wanting inclusivity 1 month ago:
Nah uh male huuumaaahn. You.
- Comment on These dames wanting inclusivity 1 month ago:
The fact that it apparently doesn’t sound creepy to you is creepy. You priapic huuumahn.
- Comment on A ton of bollocks, more like 1 month ago:
No no. That’s 907 and 46/249ths
- Comment on I'm pretty sure all of us have given up on any boomer giving us anything anyway 1 month ago:
Worth repeating:
Remember, there’s not an age war, there is a class war.
- Comment on Vomit-inducing article about Jeff Bezos’s obscene wealth 2 months ago:
I bet Bozos is absolutely livid about not “investing” in a presidency. He can brag about his yachts all he wants but can he say he bought a president? NoOoOo!
- Comment on "You can't have our trash because we don't have a way to charge you for it" 2 months ago:
What you are told on the phone and what will actually happen in the store are two completely different things.
- Comment on "You can't have our trash because we don't have a way to charge you for it" 2 months ago:
It almost certainly is.
- Comment on It's 54 degrees Fahrenheit (12 Celsius), raining moderately hard, the rain is cold, and there's a guy blowing around wet leaves with a leaf blower. What the hell is the obsession with leaf blowers? 2 months ago:
You are overlooking the pollution the emit while running, which is considerable, especially 2-stroke ones. A gas leaf blower used for an hour emits the same air pollution as driving 1,100 miles (source).
And the fact that that oil has to be changed periodically. They also have many plastic parts AND small engines have a notoriously high failure rate when used with ethanol fuels.
Meanwhile, the electric motors in battery ones basically run forever and properly cared for the batteries last many years, after which they can be recycled.
- Comment on It's 54 degrees Fahrenheit (12 Celsius), raining moderately hard, the rain is cold, and there's a guy blowing around wet leaves with a leaf blower. What the hell is the obsession with leaf blowers? 2 months ago:
Username checks out.
- Comment on Looking for answers 2 months ago:
“Do you want to be next? DO YOU?”
- Comment on Or Polio. Guess we should invest in iron lungs. 2 months ago:
Seems like the sort of thing that would leave some people parallelized.
- Comment on Or Polio. Guess we should invest in iron lungs. 2 months ago:
Do they play polio there?
- Comment on When leftists say "landlord are parasites" or similar dislike of landlords, do they also mean the people that own like a couple of houses as an investment, or only the big landlords? 2 months ago:
Sure thing, parasite.
- Comment on Or Polio. Guess we should invest in iron lungs. 2 months ago:
You’ve never been to Alabama, have you?
- Comment on Or Polio. Guess we should invest in iron lungs. 2 months ago:
I’m rooting for the Polio. Those cute hats and little sticks and you get to ride around at a full gallop and then drink gin & tonics afterward.
- Comment on When leftists say "landlord are parasites" or similar dislike of landlords, do they also mean the people that own like a couple of houses as an investment, or only the big landlords? 2 months ago:
… there will always be a segment of the population that will only act when incentivized
I’d argue that this is true of all the population but with the stipulation that “incentives” do not need to be monetary. I completely agree that capitalism is not human nature and feel that we’ve essentially brain-washed people to believe that money and material possessions are the reward when in fact it’s all the other things in life that actually matter. I believe that this thinking, which had lots of good reasons for existing during times of scarcity and paucity of resources, can be undone eventually. I think in a post-scarcity world (I’d argue we’re there) where it is normal for people to live fulfilled lives in significant comfort free from financial and work stress those few people who can’t shake the need to competitively accumulate will be rare indeed.
Until then we have a huge problem: we have too much highly efficient prosperity for capitalist models to make any sense at all.
Yes, I’m thinking of fully automated luxury communism.
- Comment on When leftists say "landlord are parasites" or similar dislike of landlords, do they also mean the people that own like a couple of houses as an investment, or only the big landlords? 2 months ago:
Well yeah, taxes. But…
The US government’s priorities simply lie elsewhere.
No, the American people’s priorities. And until that changes, we’re dead in the water
- Comment on When leftists say "landlord are parasites" or similar dislike of landlords, do they also mean the people that own like a couple of houses as an investment, or only the big landlords? 2 months ago:
Ah, I see. You really just want to hear yourself talk and are too intellectually lazy to engage with anyone else’s ideas.
- Comment on When leftists say "landlord are parasites" or similar dislike of landlords, do they also mean the people that own like a couple of houses as an investment, or only the big landlords? 2 months ago:
So capitalism is “ok”… sometimes?
If investments in stocks is “just as much capitalist behavior” then what makes investments in real estate somehow worse? Because you could literally be investing in companies that, as an example, seek to privatize access to water or healthcare or other things I would consider basic human rights just as much as housing. At a minimum all companies exploit the labor of their workers in parasitic ways.
“feels a little less negative on the working class” is highly subjective. I can personally see no difference between owning real estate and renting it out vs investing in companies that exploit people in other ways. Many capitalist activities that you could invest in have extremely far-reaching and long-term adverse effects, some very direct, such as use of fossil fuels.
So quite literally it feels like many complain about landlords as a kind of bogey man while the chemical plant down the road is giving their kids brain damage and another is denying them basic health care.
- Comment on When leftists say "landlord are parasites" or similar dislike of landlords, do they also mean the people that own like a couple of houses as an investment, or only the big landlords? 2 months ago:
In a circular or planned economy, those aren’t really significant measures,
Ok, sure - you just said “different” and did not specify.
As mentioned in the last reply, the Palace of Knossos, as well as the Petra were marvels of craftsmanship and engineering, staggering investments,
That involved massive exploitation and slave labor. And let’s not forget significant taxation, looting, etc.
You comparing them with modern construction methods necessitated by capitalism
I’m comparing them because I’m making the point that profit, price pressures and inflation obviously arise when private entities make huge capital investments.
So now that you’ve actually specified “different” as meaning non-capitalist systems, it leads me to wonder if you thought King Minos sought out volunteers… or did he pay everyone fairly? Are you really using “public” works built under autocratic rule as positive examples we can replicate?
- Comment on When leftists say "landlord are parasites" or similar dislike of landlords, do they also mean the people that own like a couple of houses as an investment, or only the big landlords? 2 months ago:
First up, so it’s clear, I actually agree with you. But I also don’t think this is an easy thing.
If you’re aware of public and social housing then why are you asking how community ownership and management works?
Because there is a hiccup in your logic as far as I can discern it.
On the one hand you say: “of course all rental housing should be publicly owned.”
And on the other, “I’m not certain that all housing should be public”
So how does that work?
- How does the housing become public? That’s trillions of dollars worth of property. I actually got the figure of US$7 quadrillion but I don’t believe it. What’s more, 70% of the 19.3 million rental properties in the US are owned by individual investors, meaning you’d have to either confiscate or buy from millions of individuals. I mean, it wouldn’t make sense to just build all this housing if it’s already there. Maybe a combination? But where on earth does that money come from? And how do you convince people invested in a $1.4 trillion market to give up that income?
- So let’s say somehow #1 happens over some period of time. How then do you meet ongoing demand? I get what your saying - there are examples of this working (for some values of “work”) on a small scale but over the entire rental market?
- If the public via governments has paid for all this housing at current prices, how do we then ensure rents are low? Over time yes, we can forgo all but the bare minimum rent increases to match inflation, but initially we have to foot the bill somehow. Because presumably that money has to be borrowed and we have to pay interest on it on top of ongoing maintenance, etc - there are real costs involved.
