mister_monster
@mister_monster@monero.town
46zFAv8KHaKVuYDTJ15TXAah6SCXw88Dx9UhTuUJa6ydb8m9uGLaYE3AX5JPFhsJjJ6w7NMc7vNYwQPhGkt3tE2L7pwgrte
09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
- Comment on be more like dogs 2 hours ago:
Dogs can be racist.
Source: had a racist dog once. I don’t know where he got it from because it wasn’t me.
- Comment on It is very therapeutic to garden, though. 1 day ago:
Absolutely you can compete my dude. Just not if you’re doing it commercially. If you have the space you can grow everything you need and save a ton of money.
The problem is everyone can’t do that. It doesn’t scale. To feed 8 billion you need the big ag machine. But you, yourself, if you want to focus your time and effort on digging in the soil instead of being a corporate cog, can absolutely support your needs for very cheap.
- Comment on How to manage contact information between Android and Linux without any Big Tech software? 4 days ago:
I use fossify contacts, which allows you to read and write your contacts to/from a VCF file (as opposed to import/export which must be manually done, this keeps them in the file so as you add/remove contacts the file is updated) and synching to keep the VCF file synced between my devices. No servers of any of that maintenance overhead needed.
You can use synching for all kinds of stuff too. I sync calendar (with fossify calendar) and a keepass PW database and 2fa keys this way.
- Comment on Hey there gamers 1 week ago:
Typo
- Comment on Hey there gamers 1 week ago:
The sum of all natural numbers smaller than and including x is equal to
(X+1)(x/2)
The sum of all even numbers up to and including x is that minus (n/2)² so
[(X+1)(x/2)]-(x/2)²
That would mean the sum of all odd numbers under x is equal to
(x/2)²
or sum of all odd including x (if x is odd of course) is
[(x+1)/2]²
Since the sum of all even numbers up to x is the sum of all numbers minus the sum of all odd numbers.
[-(X/2)² +2x +1]/2 (another way of writing the sum of all evens under and including a number) looks suspiciously polynomial. I want to go further.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 weeks ago:
I don’t know what he would do, I doubt veryuch different, and way less apologetic about it. But it doesn’t matter what he would do, what matters is the optics. One has a track record of funding genocide, the other doesn’t. This will sway a lot of people to at the very least stay home.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 weeks ago:
This, but mirrored, some might say.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 weeks ago:
Thatsthejoke.jpg
- Comment on [deleted] 2 weeks ago:
You go into the Trump circles. Pinch your nose and go see. Their pitch isn’t “he isn’t biden” or “vote for Trump or you’re picking Biden.” They actively like him and want him to be president, whether we disagree with that or not thems the facts. People aren’t bringing up Trump because he’s Biden’s opposition, people are bringing up Trump because that’s what the election is about. Biden’s whole reason for viability is that he is running against Trump, that’s it, that’s all, that’s his campaign slogan and platform. “I’m not Trump”.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 weeks ago:
That’s because Biden’s entire pitch is “I’m not Trump”. Nobody actually likes him or wants him to be president, they’re just stuck with bad choices in front of them. So you talk about the merits of Biden, that’s the only one you’re going to get, because that’s all he’s got. And in the face of a genocide, people can’t stomach it.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 weeks ago:
You can’t scare people into supporting something they find abhorrent this time. This rhetoric is not going to work. We are talking about a fucking genocide my dude. You’re delusional if you think “but pussygrabber” is going to motivate principled people.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 weeks ago:
I think the point these people are making here is that they’d like to not support evil at all and “but the other guy is worse” is the entirety of the fucking problem.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 weeks ago:
“Don’t mind what we do because the other guy is scarier”
That sham will work up to a point.
- Comment on Fedi Garden to Instance Admins: "Block Threads to Remain Listed" 1 month ago:
This is proof to me that the federated model has failed. I was so hopeful early on in the fediverse, I thought it was all we needed. I no longer feel that way. It’s not a network of users, its a network of power tripping fiefdoms.
Client relay network topology is the future of social networking. Check out Nostr (and ignore all the bitcoiners, see the network for what it is).
- Comment on The Feds Are Coming for “Extremist” Gamers 2 months ago:
Humorless people telling you to joke within the confines of their neurotic sensibilities. Best ignore them and carry on.
- Comment on Radical Equality 2 months ago:
I thought we already did authorship in alphabetical order so as to avoid any implied hierarchy?
- Comment on Raisin companies..WHY? why these wax type bags almost impossible to open or reseal? 8 months ago:
Now let’s talk about stickers on produce that leave adhesive behind. Yet another user experience principle thrown to the wayside by middle management who don’t understand the problem the old stickers solved.
- Comment on Is it possible for someone to "become gay" or were they always predisposed to it? 8 months ago:
Well enlighten me then.
- Comment on Is it possible for someone to "become gay" or were they always predisposed to it? 8 months ago:
No.
- Comment on Is it possible for someone to "become gay" or were they always predisposed to it? 8 months ago:
Well there are acquired tastes…
I think most folks are bi…
Yeah, that’s what I’m saying, but I’m adding that the opposite can happen also, as did in Rome, and that for some homosexual people is happening due to social pressures in their immediate environment.
- Comment on Is it possible for someone to "become gay" or were they always predisposed to it? 8 months ago:
While most people want to believe their traits are innate, the fact is Rome wouldn’t have been able to function the way it did if this were true. The existence of Rome and its sex as an institution empirically disproves the hypothesis.
I’m sure there were some men in Rome that were disgusted by the prospect of sex with men and either did it anyway as a duty or found every excuse not to, and I’m sure there were men that salivated at the idea from an early age. But by and large most of the men’s sexuality was malleable. This is certainly also the case today, there are probably some people strongly predisposed to one or the other from birth, but for most people sexuality is largely conditioning.
- Comment on Is it possible for someone to "become gay" or were they always predisposed to it? 8 months ago:
There was that guy that hit his head, went into a coma and woke up gay. So it’s possible.
Homosexuality, specifically pederastry, was a foundational institution in Rome. This would not have been possible if everyone was either born straight or gay. A significant portion of the gay population were not born day, and a significant portion of the straight population could be gay if the right social pressures existed to compel them to do so. Sexual preference really is largely just that, a preference.
- Comment on 7th Grader FORCED To Give Birth Due To GOP Anti-Abortion Laws | The Kyle Kulinski Show | Secular Talk 8 months ago:
I didn’t say anything about abortion, I just asked a question.
- Comment on 7th Grader FORCED To Give Birth Due To GOP Anti-Abortion Laws | The Kyle Kulinski Show | Secular Talk 8 months ago:
They can and do to people their own age.
- Comment on 7th Grader FORCED To Give Birth Due To GOP Anti-Abortion Laws | The Kyle Kulinski Show | Secular Talk 8 months ago:
Was she raped?
- Comment on [deleted] 8 months ago:
“Do to” lol you gab faggots and your boomer Facebook memes, you don’t know how to win. We tried to show you.
- Comment on [Discussion] According to you, what was the most unnecessary and worst sequel of all time? 8 months ago:
Conan the destroyer. The first movie (Conan the barbarian) was absolutely amazing, the second one was a cheap cash grab about some super team setting out to save a girl from an evil bad guy.
- Comment on would would the average skin tone and facial features after 300 years? 8 months ago:
Probably about like the average now, assuming the same average rate of reproduction for all the different phenotypes.
- Comment on [deleted] 8 months ago:
That’s not true. I know a couple of women who’ve proudly had many. Some people do in fact like them.
- Comment on [deleted] 8 months ago:
Believe it or not, there actually are some of us that don’t believe in god and think abortion is wrong. Actually, I hate religious arguments against abortion, they muddy the water and aren’t necessary.