When kids do linear algebra or they rise to the level of GM in chess within the first two decades of their lives, such people are obviously geniuses. Their intelligence is undeniable.
But it’s like moral/spiritual geniuses aren’t recognized in the same way, if at all. How come their intuitive expertise isn’t recognized so easily ?
Nemo@midwest.social 5 months ago
Kant? St. Augustine? Siddhartha Budda? Epictetus? Plato? Hobbes?
Ethical philosophy has had plenty of geniuses.
Chainweasel@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Immanuel Kant was a real pissant Who was very rarely stable
PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 5 months ago
Yeah, but who is today’s Buddha?
NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 5 months ago
Philosophy needs a better PR department
Nemo@midwest.social 5 months ago
why, did we lose the old one?
ExcursionInversion@lemmy.world 5 months ago
It was Henry Kissinger, still waiting on the new one to spawn in.