flora_explora
@flora_explora@beehaw.org
- Comment on Increasing the surface area of a substance increases its reaction rate. Proof by garlic. 6 days ago:
A friend of mine (from Palestine) taught me another trick with garlic: mince the garlic, then generously sprinkle it with coriander powder and mash it all together with a fork. Add to a dish (like a sauce or a stew) when it’s already mostly cooked, just at the end. It has a pretty intense flavor and is really yummy.
- Comment on Contadont deny it. 1 week ago:
Can anyone explain this to me? I cannot find anything searching for contadont :/
- Comment on Ideal Beach Body 1 week ago:
I like this list of instructions on how to have a beach body best:
- have a body
- go to the beach
- Comment on In 2015, the Fortingall Yew, one of the oldest trees in Europe, decided trans rights are tree rights and switched its sex to female 🏳️⚧️ eat shit transphobes 1 week ago:
Well, plants really don’t have to deal with our binary bullshit. Most of them don’t have any sex because they have perfect flowers anyways, meaning their flowers have male and female gametes.
- Comment on Fun science fact 1 week ago:
If Santa is the Queen, there needs to be some male drones impregnating him. It would make sense that the reindeer would fly to the freshly hatched Santas to mate with them. The sledge is only their form of wings then.
- Comment on Wtf is that 1 week ago:
As a biologist, it is always surprising to me, how frequently people don’t realize that all plants in our environment have some sort of reproduction. Like, that grass also has flowers and all house plants would also flower (except for ferns) if they were growing under the right conditions. Plant blindness is real.
- Comment on Latin names suck 1 week ago:
Just that this “robin” isn’t one, it actually is a thrush. A robin would be Erithacus. They are both in different families even (and also look pretty different).
- Comment on Choose your fighters, chat. 2 weeks ago:
I really dislike cultivars like this where they have been changed so much it doesn’t look like actual plants…
- Comment on Pika Pika 3 weeks ago:
Zarathustra kann mich mal :P
- Comment on Pika Pika 3 weeks ago:
You mean Pica pica?
- Comment on Pika Pika 3 weeks ago:
Confusingly, there is the animal in the post that is commonly called pika (Ochotona daurica). What I had to think of first was Pica pica though (the Eurasian magpie)
- Comment on South Korea police say 120,000 home cameras hacked for 'sexploitation' footage 3 weeks ago:
South Korea actually has a major problem with sexism and gender-based violence. Especially with men secretly filming women! It doesn’t seem unlikely that the filming of the gynecologist clinic was done in secret as well. Just because something is illegal doesn’t mean it actually gets punished.
There is also the larger context in which women experience daily sexism and violence. This fundamentally changes how they react to further violence. Victims of sexualized violence often think of themselves as responsible for the violence they receive, because society constantly tells them they are at fault! Victim blaming is part of society’s effort to tell women they are worthless and to keep control over them. If you solely focus on how the victims of this act of violence are at fault here, you are part of the problem.
- Comment on Ya yeet! 3 weeks ago:
Funnily enough, I just watched this very informative video on why the lactase-producing gene is actually not necessary at all for you to eat and digest dairy. If your gur biome can digest lactose, you are completely fine ;)
Also, it feels intuitive to think that there are these genetic differences between Europeans and Asians etc. But this is much more complex than you would think. Humans are much more diverse genetically, especially people from Africa. If you test whole populations of people you can maybe see some generic trends, but this does not help predict anything on an individual level. There is way too much variation possible for you to reliably predict a person’s genome. And as hinted above, the genetic variation is much higher on the African continent, where populations are genetically more similar to populations outside of Africa then to other populations in Africa. That’s why there is zero biological basis to racism btw, it is a social construct in its entirety!
Analogous to this is the difference between sexes. The variation within one sex is much higher than between sexes. And also, there is so much fuzziness in how we classify sexes with a plethora of edge cases. That’s why sexism and gender stereotypes are also just social constructs and don’t rely on biological reality.
So saying anything about the bloodline of your child really is meaningless. Unless we’re speaking of individual genetic differences passed down from your ancestors. Then you could calculate certain probabilities based on larger population data how likely it is that your child may have some genetic diseases etc. But even then you wouldn’t know if it first actually had a certain genetic mutation and secondly if this mutation will be expressed throughout your child’s life. So this is also not really predictive…
- Comment on South Korea police say 120,000 home cameras hacked for 'sexploitation' footage 3 weeks ago:
if you get mugged going through a sketchy neighborhood, that does not make it ok for a robber, but it is a valid question whether it was really good idea for you to go there.
This is classical victim blaming! Same like when people ask women what they were wearing when they experience sexualized violence. It shouldn’t matter!
You don’t know anything about the context or what patients have said and done in this clinic. You just assume everyone was OK with it.
- Comment on South Korea police say 120,000 home cameras hacked for 'sexploitation' footage 3 weeks ago:
What the actual fuck? This is victim blaming! Instead of focusing on the responsibility of the perpetrators you keep focusing on the victims. It obviously is a bad idea to have cameras in places like a gynecologist clinic. But that doesn’t give anyone the right to abuse the footage. And even if you want to focus on why there were cameras in a gynecologist clinic, how can you first blame the victims instead of actually talking about the people who put the cameras there??
- Comment on Ya yeet! 3 weeks ago:
Yeah, that one is really weird!
As a biologist, my first thought would maybe be what physiological needs my child has and how it will interact with the natural environment. And what strange foods it could potentially eat.
- Comment on Honestly wtf? 3 weeks ago:
Oh wow, didn’t know that! :O
- Comment on zingiberales 3 weeks ago:
Glad you could get something out of it :)
I’m not a teacher, just very passionate about biology and pretty active on iNaturalist. That’s where the vast majority of my knowledge of taxonomy comes from. Definitely a recommendation for everyone who is curious about their environment (no prior knowledge needed)
- Comment on zingiberales 3 weeks ago:
These are different branches on the tree of life, specifically within the plants. If you imagine this tree of life, species would be the tips of the smallest branches. And the branches itself would be different units (=taxa) that lead to various branches. So in taxonomy we use special words for these different units/taxa dependent on how far back they are removed from the species. Like, you may have heard of a genus. For example we as humans are the species Homo sapiens and our genus is the first part of that: Homo. There were also other species in that genus, like the Neanderthals (Homo neanderthalensis) or the Denisovans (Homo denisova). This works the same in plants. For example ginger is actually the species Zingiber officinale. There are also other gingers, like Zingiber spectabile. If we go one level up the branch, we reach the family ginger is in: Zingiberaceae. In this “ginger family” we have other plants of different genera like turmeric (Curcuma longa) or cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum). Notice how the first word of these species isn’t Zingiberales, because they are in other genera. So, Zingiber is more closely related to any other Zingiber than it is to the other plants in Zingiberaceae. And one level above, Zingiber is more closely related to any plant in the Zingiberaceae than to any other plant. Taxonomy is based on who evolved from whom, that’s why it is important what are the closest relatives to a given species.
This is fundamentally what taxonomy is about. From there on we can go up the branches of the tree of life and explore the branches that connect to even more species. If we go up one major level from the family we reach the “order” (I’m simplifying here, taxonomy is much more intricate than that). An order of plants contains various families and the OP spoke of the order Zingiberales (ending in -ales). The “words” I’ve used are families (ending in -aceae) as you might have expected from Zingiberaceae above. And the families I’ve listed in the first half are all within the same order of Zingiberales. These are all very common ornamental or otherwise cultivated plants. You may know Marantaceae as calantheas/goeppertias/prayer plants, Heliconiaceae as lobster-claws. Other important members of this order are also bananas (Musaceae).
In the second half of my comment I talk about Poales and seaweeds not being Spermatophyta. So, Poales as you might have guessed from the ending is a separate order of plants. In it are most prominently the grasses (Poaceae) OP spoke about in their post. And seaweeds not even being Spermatophyta means they aren’t even seed plants.
I hope this explains it :)
- Comment on zingiberales 3 weeks ago:
Woah, what? Even Marantaceae, Costaceae and Heliconiaceae??
As others have pointed out, the second to last panel doesn’t make much sense. There are officially only 8 families in the Zingiberales. Poaceae are obviously in the Poales and seaweeds are not even Spermatophyta… If you meant seagrasses then those are in the Alismatales, so in a different monocot order.
- Comment on *confused flatfish noises* 4 weeks ago:
Hm, in small animals my previous point of a 2D vs 3D space is also valid. Large land prey animals “only” have to look from side to side to spot predators. Small animals have to look in all 3 dimensions, like sharks
- Comment on *confused flatfish noises* 4 weeks ago:
Haha, I’m not a bird person and didn’t bother to look it up. Thanks for the correction!
- Comment on DISORDERED SUPERORDER 4 weeks ago:
Cuuuute!!!
- Comment on True and real. 4 weeks ago:
That’s basically correct, yes! The baby parts are the gametophytes and they then use their male and female parts to produce a new zygote, which will grow into a sporophyte. This sporophyte is what we know as a fern. It will produce and finally release many many spores, which are the “airdrop baby parts”.
- Comment on *confused flatfish noises* 4 weeks ago:
They also have to orient themselves in a truely 3D landscape, unlike terrestrial predators who hunt on basically a 2D plane. Birds of prey (with the exception of owls) also don’t have front-facing eyes, probably for similar reasons (and they’re stereoscopic vision also works a bit different I think with very different points of focus).
- Comment on Polypodolf! 4 weeks ago:
Wow! What is the lower plant? Are the upper two both Selaginella or only the right one?
- Comment on Gotta dissect them all!! 4 weeks ago:
If anyone else wonders:
- Talpa is an actual genus of moles: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talpa_(mammal)
- defossus is latin and according to Wiktionary it means “excavated, planted or hidden”: en.wiktionary.org/wiki/defossus (fossus coming from Latin fodiō meaning “to dig; to pierce; to goad”, en.wiktionary.org/wiki/fossus)
- Comment on ✨️carboniferous trees✨️ 4 weeks ago:
There are a lot of fossilized records. You can see various examples of whole trunks or roots here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigillaria?wprov=sfla1
- Comment on Mustaaaaaaaaaard 4 weeks ago:
Alliaria petiolata is a pretty common herb in Europe (at least here in Germany) and it is related to mustard, cabbage plants and rapeseed. Garlic plants are not related to it at all and are very different.
- Comment on Name your favourite prehistoric tree. 4 weeks ago:
To me the coolest ones are certainly any prehistoric Lycopodiopsida, like the Sigillaria shown here!