Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

just temporarily embarrassed billionaires, one good idea or lottery ticket from making it rich

⁨909⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨sanitation@lemmy.today⁩ to ⁨workreform@lemmy.world⁩

https://lemmy.today/pictrs/image/ec38f9c7-a590-4997-8069-5b27c8e3abb4.png

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today ⁨3⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    But then they’ll get smart, and when AI has led to a permanent 65% unemployment rate, they will demand UBI, and take it from the Trillionaires.

    source
    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      AI is already keeping them from becoming smart. The majority of college students are having gen “AI” write their essays now.

      source
  • uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Yeah, now it’s too late. Taxing the billionaires will only be undone by them as they use their vast riches to influence elections and control governments. Today’s ultra wealthy has more wealth and political power than they have at any time in human history, and they are set on world domination (and enslaving the worker class until they can all be replaced with automation).

    We’re going to have to find a way to take all their ill-gotten gains. And rest assured, they will not relinquish it unless forced to do so. We’ll probably have to pry their lucre from their cold dead hands, and that of their heirs (and their heirs).

    source
    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Not to mention their influence on you.

      Hasan Piker is currently on the front page of twitch.tv, a website owned by Jeff Bezos.

      Yeah, now it’s too late.

      You feel this way because the influencers the billionaires recommend you watch have made you feel this way. You’re told by Jeff Bezos’ boy Hasan that liberals are the enemy so you will never vote for taxing billionaires. It’s only “too late” because you’ve been made to believe it’s too late. You need to stop listening to millionaires that are being promoted by billionaires.

      source
      • Jax@sh.itjust.works ⁨39⁩ ⁨minutes⁩ ago

        Whoa whoa whoa there Space Cowboy - you’re speaking too much sense. This is Lemmy, we just shit ourselves petulantly here.

        source
    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      That’s why they’re working so hard on militarizing AI. As they become more and more obscene, the risk of getting killed by their own private security gets higher.

      They want killing machines protecting them instead.

      source
  • Professorozone@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Here we go again. No sources.

    According to his site:

    …senate.gov/…/sanders-make-college-tuition-free/

    It would cost $70B/year.

    According to this site, he makes about $9.8B/year, so even a 100% tax wouldn’t do it.

    The problem is how do you calculate his taxes? He’s already doing that and paying his $800 or whatever it is. So you have to make assumptions about how much you would tax at 4.7%.

    I therefore assumed this meant if his entire net worth were taxed at 4.7%.

    According to here which tracks it real time: www.forbes.com/profile/jeff-bezos/

    It’s currently $270B.

    $270B x 0.047 = $12.7B.

    So no, you couldn’t fund it just by taxing him 4.7%. I think we’ll need to create a special tax on billionaires to cover the rest.

    source
    • krisevol@lemmus.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨hour⁩ ago

      Plus it didn’t explain were the money comes from. Bazos makes 80k a year, and his stocks go up in value which is why good net worth goes up. If we taxes his unrealized gains where the money come from?

      source
    • uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Currently, we’re subsidizing Bezos. US taxpayers are paying Amazon

      And currently, a few people, including Bezos, own more than does half of the US.

      source
    • LodeMike@lemmy.today ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Wealth tax… It is extremely obvious that this would be a wealth tax.

      source
    • Cheebus@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      look man i’m all for math, and yep a lot of these social problems can math out pessimistically if we use our current economic model as the basis

      but the reality here is shits fucked, trillionaires should exist, and eat the fucking rich for once

      let’s do that for a change

      source
    • ProfessorProteus@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      so even a 100% tax wouldn’t do it.

      Let’s do it anyway.

      source
    • Jankatarch@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Tbf 4.7% would still take is a long way, especially if colleges stopped being a “company” and didn’t inflate their prices in spite of student loan companies.

      source
  • InvalidName2@lemmy.zip ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Part of the issue here is that the damage has already been done. The taxes should have been in place a LOOOOOONG time ago to at least partially prevent getting where we are now. This is the equivalent strategy of running out the clock while you’re ahead. They’ve done that already. Focusing on the worst of the worst is a fool’s errand.

    Doesn’t mean we can’t update the rules moving forward, of course, but you’re going to find that your ideas are not as popular as you think if and when people realize they have to voluntarily make compromises. Amazon could be harmed, perhaps mortally, quite easily if everyone would stop buying from their e-commerce site and businesses would stop using their web services. Good luck with that. Walmart would cease to be a thing if everybody stopped shopping there. You know the song and the dance, but that shit’s not happening.

    source
  • jdr@lemmy.ml ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Lots of American universities are named after the dudes who paid for the initially. I’m not saying I’d be proud to go to Bezos U (go fighting bald eagles!) but if it were free then you could hold your nose.

    source
    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      There isn’t a university named after a rich dude that’s free. Most are very expensive to maintain the brand value of the family name.

      source
      • Darkaga@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Harvard, Princeton, Yale, MIT, and Penn are all free if your family makes less than $200k/yr. A bunch more are free at $150k and $100k cutoffs.

        source
    • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Those are all private.

      source
  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

    Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but trillionaires should be forced to transition into billionaires, and billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

    source
    • Steve@communick.news ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      I prefer “Financial Hording”
      It literally is a hording mentality. But because it’s money, people give it a pass.

      source
      • nonentity@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        A distinction sans difference, it’s neurotoxic however it’s labelled.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • PattyMcB@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Hoarding*

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • chaogomu@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      ignoring all the evil shit, Christianity was created with prohibitions on greed and pride and such.

      Then in the early 20th century, rich assholes paid for a radio “preacher” to basically say that greed and pride and shit were fine and dandy. And thus was born Prosperity Gospel.

      source
      • nonentity@sh.itjust.works ⁨4⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Economics is the social control mechanism that filled the void vacated by religion after the enlightenment. A bunch of accounting rules cherry picked by the ruling class, protected from scrutiny, arbitrarily and inconsistently imposed on the masses, enforced by threat of violence.

        Finance is its mythology. Banks are its cathedrals. Financial institutions its churches. Economists its clergy. GDP its God.

        If religion is the opium of the masses, economics is their fentanyl.

        source
      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        “All the evil shit” basically comes around when somebody inevitably shows up and says:

        “Look, those books are a lot of words. You’re too stupid to handle such responsibility. You need me/us to interpret it for your busy, feeble little minds. Don’t worry God gave us special authority for some indiscernible reason so you have to listen to us. 😉”

        “Wide is the path to destruction” definitely comes to mind when it comes to people choosing the path of least intellectual resistance. (In the modern era, with reasonable literacy rates and unparalleled access to scripture.)

        Sorry I’m more trying to signal boost you here because you’re so right:

        Christianity practiced in earnest was a big time obstacle for the wealthy and powerful. They couldn’t stamp it out by force, so they do what they do with any culture: They stole it and sold it back in a way that glorifies themselves.

        Nothing is more opposed to Christ than the disgusting greed and nationalism displayed today. It’s disgusting.

        source
  • BillyClark@piefed.social ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Strangely, I guess, if I try to imagine myself having one billion dollars, it’s just an amount of money that the only way I’d even make a dent in it is if I either was specifically making bad purchases or if I had lost my mind. (For example, just gambling it all away.)

    Even if you simply threw it in a normal index fund that isn’t focused on dividends, but growth, you might still make 1%, or 10 million a year in dividends. So just the dividends you accidentally make would let you live a very luxurious lifestyle.

    I could imagine having one billion dollars if it was just the worth of my private company that I didn’t want to split up or something like that, but otherwise, it’s really just too much money. I’d be donating to charities just to keep my net worth at a level that I could look myself in the mirror and not feel like a villain, and so I’d actually be in favor of things like wealth taxes. It would just make my life easier.

    I think people who imagine themselves as billionaires and are still stingy with money are either not accurately imagining that amount of money, or they’re too stupid to have any amount of money, or they’re villains, just like every billionaire today is a villain.

    source
    • PattyMcB@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      The reason you can’t be a billionaire (not saying it’s a bad thing) is because you think this way. You’re not greedy enough.

      source
      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Maybe I should get my brains scrambled, could help with the greed issue.

        source
    • Tehhund@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Someone once suggested that if you become worth $1 billion, we declare that you win capitalism. We confiscate 99% of it and name a dog park in your honor.

      source
  • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Elon’s treason and corruption would be an easier case to prosecute and confiscate his ill gotten wealth.

    Especially with ICE and national security involved.

    source
    • Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Take back what is rightfully the American peoples’ money from Elon, Trump, and the rest of his lackies. Use it to subsidize college, housing, and healthcare.

      source
      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Seriously, would be near-utopia in like a year.

        Imagine all the JOBS that would “create” with so many public projects to handle all at once! Public transport! Healthcare! Education! USAID! Roads without potholes! Bridges not on the verge of collapse? Think of the dams!!

        Wow. Seizing the ill gotten gains of like 3 to 5 people would fix almost everything, and yet here we are. I truly can’t comprehend it…

        source
  • DagwoodIII@piefed.social ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I was at work, talking to someone my own income.

    I asked him to name some things that he’d buy with a billion dollars that he couldn’t get with $100 million.

    He couldn’t actually name one thing, but kept insisting that billionaires ’needed’ the money.

    source
    • Natanael@infosec.pub ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Presidents.

      source
      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Funny enough I feel like presidents and other officials are shockingly cheap, monetarily, too.

        I bet you get a lot further simply with promises of access your network of other wealthy a-holes who are influential simply because they’re wealthy, and wealthy because they’re influential.

        Ugh. 🤢

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      I mean he couldn’t come up with mega yacht?

      That gets you into the hundreds of millions. Bezos is estimated at 500 million.

      source
  • Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    It’s okay we’re only gonna tax trillionaires, so the billionaires are okay

    source
  • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I’m assuming this is about taxing his Net Worth and not his Income? Because most years they have negative income, and on some years they have like $30Bn which won’t be enough for free college.

    source
  • gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    this is just an uninformed take. the reason why “taxing billionaires doesn’t work” is said by some people, is because there’s free trade and billionaires could just move their stuff abroad where it isn’t taxed. we need an end to free trade first before taxing wealth becomes feasible.

    it has nothing to do with “taxing my feelings of becoming a billionaire” or such

    source
    • nialv7@lemmy.world ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      then let them leave and let them take their money with them. they don’t contribute to the society anyway.

      you are mistaking money for real resources. houses are built with cement, bricks, gravel, plaster, and labour. you cannot build a house with money. billionaire cannot take real resources with them. in fact if they leave they will stop hoarding resources and that will make our lives better, not worse.

      source
    • tburkhol@slrpnk.net ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      If billionaires will relocate to reduce their taxes, why are all the tech CEOs still US citizens and not, say, Bermuda, with 0% income tax & 0% corporate tax?

      source
    • Steve@communick.news ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      US citizens pay US income tax, no matter where in the world they live.

      China makes foreign nationals pay taxes on any revenue that comes from China.

      You don’t need to end free trade.

      source
      • gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        yeah this is income tax. what about wealth tax?

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • Eq0@literature.cafe ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Honestly, to me this is a bad take because only a handful of nations in the world consider to tax their nationals when living outside of their borders.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • luokaton@lemmy.zip ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      no they won’t. they can relocate their asses, i guess, but the assets they actually make money on are not easy (often impossible) to move.

      tax the corporations.

      here’s how: youtu.be/f-oDDojrTcg?

      source
      • gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        but the assets they actually make money on are not easy (often impossible) to move.

        companies have been moved to china en masse since 1970 though

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      In an ideal scenario, other countries would see our prosperous age after taxing our billionaires, and they’d want some of that sweet stuff so they’d do the same.

      All the billionaires would have to fairly pay back for the value people provided to make them so rich, or retreat to some uninhabited island somewhere.

      Either way we’d totally win lol.

      Then again, as an aside, did you know if you’re a U.S citizen and leave the U.S you’re still subject to income tax abroad? Isn’t that interesting?

      I seriously wonder if all these asshats would actually revoke their citizenship en masse to avoid taxes.

      …and then even if they did, we’d be rid of them so society would start to balance out again…

      source
    • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      I think the one example of this actually happening was in London, and the billionaires who did leave did not actually contribute anything to the local economy: as many of the workers they employed as possible were migrants brought in or outsourced and they kept skimming profits off the top to hoard. The businesses they ran continued operating as normal even if some got sold off.

      source
  • Sirdubdee@piefed.social ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Tax the billionaires now so we all can be billionaires later.

    source
    • grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      fight them here so we won’t have to fight them over there

      source
  • queueBenSis@sh.itjust.works ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    because more education definitely would not increase someone’s chances of making more money

    source
    • Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      I believe the 2nd part of the post is satire but i agree. The issue is that the more educated you are the more “”" woke brainwashed"“” (read: educated) you become, so conservatives naturally dont like colleges

      source
  • FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    One of the things that 'Muricans don’t seem to understand is that the most awful, the worst most humiliating and the most absurd reason that the civilised world sneers at them is because they chose stupidity and ignorance

    source
    • Dookieman12@piefed.social ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Lmao. Just ignore every poll that says a majority of US Americans want universal healthcare, higher taxes on billionaires, legal weed, green energy, EVs, and stronger labor laws and you’re absolutely correct!

      source
      • reksas@sopuli.xyz ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        if its really majority then things would improve, no? Politcans would get elected that make these things happen?

        Or if that majority is powerless to do anything, then they should cry out that america is not democracy so loudly that other countrys couldnt ignore it, provided that this majority actually cares and doesnt just wish things were better but conform with the regime and choose ignorance.

        Talk is cheap, actions are what matter.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Lol right? Like seeing a kid getting beat up by a bully with an obvious born-with advantage and being like “I CAN’T BELIEVE YOU SPECIFICALLY ASKED FOR THIS THO! YOU’RE SO STUPID AND AWFUL, KID!”

        source