It eats.
It is thus the primordial consumer.
… kinda does bear a resemblance to what AM turns Ted into.
Submitted 14 hours ago by restingOface@quokk.au to [deleted]
https://quokk.au/static/media/posts/cb/sY/cbsYdmgwL0AQj1D.jpg
It eats.
It is thus the primordial consumer.
… kinda does bear a resemblance to what AM turns Ted into.
No clear reason? It’s because the thing can successfully make more of itself before dying. That’s literally it.
See also: ticks
No animal has reason to exist.
*nothing has
As an animal myself, I’d like to object.
It’s disturbing to me that so many people search for what something is used for or what’s the value or right to life a creature has. The point of life is to live. If you are successful you maybe make a child or split into a copy of yourself when you get enough food.
Purpose is something you accept for yourself. Imposing it on others is diabolically evil when they don’t have a thing to do with your clade. And still, it would be the case that a person would look at an animal and say “what’s the point of you?”
<3
utility has several virtues, but i agree that it’s not the end-all/be-all. strictly speaking the “point” of any living thing is to pass it’s genes by reproduction, but in a complex and evolving world there are lots of animals that have a “point” in existing. oysters filter water, worms enrich soil, birds spread seeds, bees pollinate flowers, there are primary decomposers and secondary decomposers and tertiary decomposers and some birds build nests in trees and squirrels hide nuts and, you get the picture?
then there are other animals that we have changed for their utility. cows, pigs, chickens, and sheep are delicious and they would not make up such a share of modern biomass if we didn’t industrialize their slaughter. in some cases the point of an animal is that we’re gonna eat it.
if you’re an emotion-forward person you might think “oh, no, that’s terrible!” and you’re allowed to feel that way but usually things are the way they are for a bunch of reasons. feelings are great but food security is better. utility also has a role to play in conservation: we’re having a great time with industry but if the earth suffers catastrophic ecological collapse, the whole party stops.
I also find that to be a weird question to consider, as though something must have a purpose to be worthy of existence
In that vein, what is the point of humans? To bring on the 6th mass extinction?
We’re really trying, aren’t we?
a fanciful answer i heard was that “humans are how the universe perceives itself,” and a person could be forgiven for thinking that the point of humans is to do science. closer to the ground, the point of humans seems to be to alter our surroundings to suit our society: kind of like ants. we build, we live, we reproduce, we spread. it’s not a good thing or a bad thing, it just is what it is.
So from the wiki
The monophyly of Xenacoelomorpha soon became established, but its position as either a basal bilaterian clade or a deuterostome remained unresolved until 2016, when two new studies, with increased gene and taxon sampling, again placed Xenoturbella as the sister group of Acoelomorpha within Xenacoelomorpha, and placed Xenacoelomorpha as sister to Nephrozoa (Protostomia plus Deuterostomia), and therefore the basalmost bilaterian phylum<
Seems like “where on the tree of life” is “the first bilaterals” which makes sense. They seem very worm-like in bodyplan. Shit from the Pre-Cambrian can look pretty alien and have shaky relationships to more derived species.
exists for no clear reason Sounds like Humans
Sounds like everything, if you’re leaning nihilist.
Nihilists! Fuck me! I mean, say what you want about the tenets of National Socialism Dude, at least it’s an ethos!
It also only has one hole, which, if you ask some topologists, is what humans have.
I thought most humans are 7 holes
It truly has one hole, in that it eats, has a digestive sack, and then vomits the poop
Kinda like a one stroke engine. The fuel and the exhaust all just mix.
It’s gross, but I can’t see any reason this disqualifies it from being on the tree of life.
vomits the poop
have had norovirus, know that feel
If the hole doesn’t go through, it is only a pocket, typographically identical to a plate.
Well we’re just doughnuts.
Why is the digestive sack not an organ?
Exist for no reason? All life has a purpose, and that is to poop. The excrement speaks for itself.
Time to wake up and go to work in the shit factory!
Poop is subsistence, Sex is persistence
It sounds like it doesn’t have a poop hole
The universe is a chain of cause and effect, and the only way to interpret “a reason” for something without introducing artificial human constructs of morality, is “what caused it?”. The process of evolution caused this.
It looks like they do get new openings on the surface that excrete eggs and sperm.
I don’t think any natural thing exists for a reason. That’s reserved for things made with intention by sentient beings.
It’s the roomba of the sea
is that a living fleshlight?
This is a place for science! Not (your deepest) fantasy!
Scientists do love to talk about worms
This has some details: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenacoelomorpha?wprov=sfti1…
Bit of clarification: Xenacoelomorpha is the phylum that the genus Xenoturbella is under.
Someone left a tag at the top of the Xenacoelomorpha article advocating a rewrite, which I could probably quickly investigate right now (or even just check WoRMS) if I weren’t currently a lazy lump of dead weight. Without assessing the tag’s merits, I’d at least advise treading lightly as a heuristic.
If it has at least one hole, then it exists for a reason. ;)
Sounds like the pinnacle of evolution.
You know, simple tools like cat? Same thing in software engineering.
Doesn’t belong. Too lame!
recently the phylogenetic studies place this with another unusual bilaterian animal( very basal animals(Post-sponge creatures), they couldnt figure out which things this is related to.
vithigar@lemmy.ca 4 hours ago
Looks inside…
Image
…organs.
humanspiral@lemmy.ca 3 hours ago
is there a poop hole?
explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 hours ago
No but also yes