And relative fucks
Hope you like math
Submitted 3 weeks ago by MacNCheezus@lemmy.today to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://lemmy.today/pictrs/image/34bd3ec0-a16f-4c87-b9e0-232b53cc72b6.jpeg
Comments
HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
Psythik@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
That’s mainly limited to the American South.
dohpaz42@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
You’re thinking of the fucks relatives, or also known in scientific circles as The Alabamian Constant.
muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com 3 weeks ago
Is the speed of fucks thus constant?
kirkoman@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Nice try but no proof yet if the fuckery field is irrational.
stevedice@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Oh, there’s definitely irrational fucks. I don’t see a proof that there’s indeed a fuckomorphism between C and F.
ornery_chemist@mander.xyz 3 weeks ago
Nah, just look at the folks over in HR. Irrational fucks to a person.
Sloogs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
Here, I gotchu:
The phrase “you stupid fuck” Implies the existence of irrational fucks.
don@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
So what’s their opinion on the holy fuck?
radix@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Must be an angel with wings, so they can also have a flying fuck.
anomnom@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
I’ve never given a flying fuck though, and I’ve never heard anyone else give one either, so I’m not convinced they exist.
Medic8teMe@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
The holy trinity.
Fucking God Damn, Jesus Fuck and Holy Fuck.
Lemminary@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
No idea, but I do see plenty of evil fucks every day on the news.
Paradachshund@lemmy.today 3 weeks ago
There are definitely positive and negative fucks
MisterFrog@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
There being absolute fucks doesn’t imply positive and negative fucks though.
It implies we’ve set a point to measure against which we call zero fucks.
Perhaps there’s an absolute zero fucks which can never be reached.
doingthestuff@lemy.lol 3 weeks ago
This does not even scratch the surface of the possible uses and variations of fuck.
adarza@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
∅ = how many i have left to give.
Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 3 weeks ago
What in the fucking fuck?! is a good one, too. Has some real what in tarnation? energy to it.
silasmariner@programming.dev 3 weeks ago
What in the fucking fuck implies that fucking is an injective function over the field of fucks.
silasmariner@programming.dev 3 weeks ago
From this we can infer that fucking is a complex function 🤔
fubarx@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Would plain old “What the Fuck” imply a null set?
Entitle9294@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Ok, everyone but me seems to get it, so I’ll ask. I get everything but the last bit. What does “isomorphic with the complex field” mean? I think I know what isomorphic means from some dabbling I’ve done in category theory.
Opisek@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
In means you can map every element bijectively to one from the complex field AND addition and multiplication can be performed in either field without leading to contractions, i.e. a+b=c <=> f(a)+f(b)=f(a+b)=f© and equivalent for multiplication. This is the part that the meme fails to consider, because nowhere is addition or multiplication for this novel field defined.
mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 3 weeks ago
“i do not give a single fuck” implies an additive identity fuck, and “I don’t give two fucks” implies a multiplicative identity fuck. That’s a start at least!
Entitle9294@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I’ll give this some attention when time permits because this does not make things clearer, lol.
I’ll start with what a field is and a complex field 🤞
Atlas_@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Hmmm. But what if fucks aren’t fungible?
Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
No prove of irrational fucks yet tho
Klear@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Plenty of empirical evidence around.
Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
But do we get all of them?
icelimit@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
Holy fuck?
JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz 3 weeks ago
Which implies the existence of a non god affected fucks.
icelimit@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
Given the overwhelming prevalence of holy fucks relative to damned fucks, this suggests sanctified beings get laid more.
save_the_humans@leminal.space 3 weeks ago
Must be a reference to the space of topological fucks. I believe this one is equivalent to the torus.
boydster@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
I fucking love this
DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
fan-fucking-tastic
some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 3 weeks ago
I’ve always loved ladies who are smarter / better educated than me.
sunoc@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
Okay but is the fuck a monoid in the category of endofunctors ?
OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
The fuck transcends our ability to capture its essence
untorquer@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Euler’s fuck formula.
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
I actually tend to treat fucks like the constant C in calculus. Ideally it should cancel out entirely and you should give the minimal amount of fucks in all of your answers.
Grostleton@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
Fucks can also have a social hierarchy, as evidenced by the phrase:
“I don’t give a single solitary fuck”
save_the_humans@leminal.space 2 weeks ago
These are are simply unitary fucks. Matrix fucks with eigenvalue absolute value of 1. Surprisingly useful for quantum computing applications.
ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
What the uncomputable fuck
save_the_humans@leminal.space 2 weeks ago
Ahh the navier stokes fuck. Believed to actually be computable.
FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
fucking fucks implies fucks are procreating.
BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 3 weeks ago
What the fuck
MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 3 weeks ago
Or at least they’re trying…
fckreddit@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
I see this comment section is full of various operations defined on fuckery. I don’t think they form a field or even a ringi
MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
So what’s fuck fuckity fuck fuck fuck?
MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 3 weeks ago
About tree fiddy
unrealizedrealities@kbin.melroy.org 3 weeks ago
Perspective changes the reality around it.
Zerush@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
I prefer to solve the Hodge conjecture
CucumberFetish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
The real question is - is fuck Turing-complete?
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Opisek@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
It’s actually a beautiful language for arguing about computability because of how similar it is to a theoretical turning machine in that it possesses a read/write head that can move left and right on an infinite band. It’s also incredibly simple to simulate using any other language of choice, including assembly and heck, even raw logic gates.
In this essay I will explain why Brainfuck should be the first language taught to computer science majors.
ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 3 weeks ago
Well that’s fucked…
UnRelatedBurner@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
I wouldn’t get water from that
Redfox8@mander.xyz 3 weeks ago
If you’d like to hear about the versatility of the word ‘fuck’ click and enjoy some Wildhearts at the same time :)
You may want to skip the last minute…on the original cd it was waaay longer!
WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
This is useful for those trying to convey more precisely the amount of fucks they give.
truthfultemporarily@feddit.org 3 weeks ago
0+0i