And relative fucks
Hope you like math
Submitted 1 month ago by MacNCheezus@lemmy.today to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://lemmy.today/pictrs/image/34bd3ec0-a16f-4c87-b9e0-232b53cc72b6.jpeg
Comments
HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Psythik@lemmy.world 1 month ago
That’s mainly limited to the American South.
dohpaz42@lemmy.world 1 month ago
You’re thinking of the fucks relatives, or also known in scientific circles as The Alabamian Constant.
muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com 1 month ago
Is the speed of fucks thus constant?
kirkoman@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Nice try but no proof yet if the fuckery field is irrational.
stevedice@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Oh, there’s definitely irrational fucks. I don’t see a proof that there’s indeed a fuckomorphism between C and F.
ornery_chemist@mander.xyz 1 month ago
Nah, just look at the folks over in HR. Irrational fucks to a person.
Sloogs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Here, I gotchu:
The phrase “you stupid fuck” Implies the existence of irrational fucks.
don@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
So what’s their opinion on the holy fuck?
radix@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Must be an angel with wings, so they can also have a flying fuck.
anomnom@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
I’ve never given a flying fuck though, and I’ve never heard anyone else give one either, so I’m not convinced they exist.
Medic8teMe@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
The holy trinity.
Fucking God Damn, Jesus Fuck and Holy Fuck.
Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 month ago
No idea, but I do see plenty of evil fucks every day on the news.
Paradachshund@lemmy.today 1 month ago
There are definitely positive and negative fucks
MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 month ago
There being absolute fucks doesn’t imply positive and negative fucks though.
It implies we’ve set a point to measure against which we call zero fucks.
Perhaps there’s an absolute zero fucks which can never be reached.
doingthestuff@lemy.lol 1 month ago
This does not even scratch the surface of the possible uses and variations of fuck.
adarza@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
∅ = how many i have left to give.
Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
What in the fucking fuck?! is a good one, too. Has some real what in tarnation? energy to it.
silasmariner@programming.dev 1 month ago
What in the fucking fuck implies that fucking is an injective function over the field of fucks.
silasmariner@programming.dev 1 month ago
From this we can infer that fucking is a complex function 🤔
fubarx@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Would plain old “What the Fuck” imply a null set?
Entitle9294@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Ok, everyone but me seems to get it, so I’ll ask. I get everything but the last bit. What does “isomorphic with the complex field” mean? I think I know what isomorphic means from some dabbling I’ve done in category theory.
Opisek@lemmy.world 1 month ago
In means you can map every element bijectively to one from the complex field AND addition and multiplication can be performed in either field without leading to contractions, i.e. a+b=c <=> f(a)+f(b)=f(a+b)=f© and equivalent for multiplication. This is the part that the meme fails to consider, because nowhere is addition or multiplication for this novel field defined.
mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 1 month ago
“i do not give a single fuck” implies an additive identity fuck, and “I don’t give two fucks” implies a multiplicative identity fuck. That’s a start at least!
Entitle9294@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I’ll give this some attention when time permits because this does not make things clearer, lol.
I’ll start with what a field is and a complex field 🤞
Atlas_@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Hmmm. But what if fucks aren’t fungible?
Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
No prove of irrational fucks yet tho
Klear@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Plenty of empirical evidence around.
Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
But do we get all of them?
icelimit@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
Holy fuck?
JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz 1 month ago
Which implies the existence of a non god affected fucks.
icelimit@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
Given the overwhelming prevalence of holy fucks relative to damned fucks, this suggests sanctified beings get laid more.
save_the_humans@leminal.space 1 month ago
Must be a reference to the space of topological fucks. I believe this one is equivalent to the torus.
boydster@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
I fucking love this
DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 1 month ago
fan-fucking-tastic
some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 month ago
I’ve always loved ladies who are smarter / better educated than me.
sunoc@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Okay but is the fuck a monoid in the category of endofunctors ?
OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 1 month ago
The fuck transcends our ability to capture its essence
untorquer@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Euler’s fuck formula.
Grostleton@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Fucks can also have a social hierarchy, as evidenced by the phrase:
“I don’t give a single solitary fuck”
save_the_humans@leminal.space 1 month ago
These are are simply unitary fucks. Matrix fucks with eigenvalue absolute value of 1. Surprisingly useful for quantum computing applications.
ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
What the uncomputable fuck
save_the_humans@leminal.space 1 month ago
Ahh the navier stokes fuck. Believed to actually be computable.
FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 month ago
fucking fucks implies fucks are procreating.
BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 1 month ago
What the fuck
MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 1 month ago
Or at least they’re trying…
fckreddit@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
I see this comment section is full of various operations defined on fuckery. I don’t think they form a field or even a ringi
MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 1 month ago
So what’s fuck fuckity fuck fuck fuck?
MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 1 month ago
About tree fiddy
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I actually tend to treat fucks like the constant C in calculus. Ideally it should cancel out entirely and you should give the minimal amount of fucks in all of your answers.
unrealizedrealities@kbin.melroy.org 1 month ago
Perspective changes the reality around it.
Zerush@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
I prefer to solve the Hodge conjecture
CucumberFetish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
The real question is - is fuck Turing-complete?
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Opisek@lemmy.world 1 month ago
It’s actually a beautiful language for arguing about computability because of how similar it is to a theoretical turning machine in that it possesses a read/write head that can move left and right on an infinite band. It’s also incredibly simple to simulate using any other language of choice, including assembly and heck, even raw logic gates.
In this essay I will explain why Brainfuck should be the first language taught to computer science majors.
ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 1 month ago
Well that’s fucked…
UnRelatedBurner@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
I wouldn’t get water from that
Redfox8@mander.xyz 1 month ago
If you’d like to hear about the versatility of the word ‘fuck’ click and enjoy some Wildhearts at the same time :)
You may want to skip the last minute…on the original cd it was waaay longer!
WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 1 month ago
This is useful for those trying to convey more precisely the amount of fucks they give.
truthfultemporarily@feddit.org 1 month ago
0+0i