I volunteer at a food bank, and the company that sends us our food decides what we get. Last Tuesday they sent so much produce we could not fit it all into fridges. We were trying to give away cases of the food on Wednesday, but people were turning it down because they had no place to store a case of tomatoes, or cauliflower. This was what we had left after last Wednesday’s morning give away. Not pictured the 5000lbs of watermelons, the 2500lbs of onions (those will last a lot longer).
The company that supplies us wants to move from sending shipments every other week, to once a month. This would cause even more no produce loss.
It is so frustrating to have all this food for it to go bad. Even if we got the same volume of produce, but there was variation in what it is we could give it away easier.
oz1sej@feddit.dk 2 days ago
Seldom have I seen a better example of why universal basic income is so preferable to food banks.
MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 2 days ago
Please explain how that would solve the issue of people not wanting to eat their vegetables.
cooopsspace@infosec.pub 2 days ago
Missed the mark here of course.
People should be able to buy what they need, not be at the whims of what a capitalist entity dumps in a food bank.
Not everyone has the ability to store, prepare or even cook vegetables. Due to lack of utensils, food storage or even something to heat with. For many, vegetables would just be a liability and force you to choose between other necessities.
Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 days ago
OP (this dickhead):
OOP:
They can’t give it away. There are unfortunately rules. If they were caught doing so, they would no longer be giving it out to anyone. This is, again, why basic income would be better than food banks.
Not to mention the fact that plenty of people aren’t starving today, but will be starving in the next week or two, after this very perishable food is spoiled.
Why are you like this? Are you having fun mocking the impoverished?
burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 2 days ago
i cast ten thousand watermelons falling on top of you
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
Except for the fact that a lot of these people aren’t capable of managing money.
They are on the street because they have serious issues
Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 2 days ago
Turns out that money is one of those things that the less you have of it, the harder it is to manage.
SereneSadie@lemmy.myserv.one 2 days ago
And who’s supporting them?
Clearly not you.
cenzorrll@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
Yeah, but the crux of it would probably lie in the fact that they’ve never had money to manage. From what I’ve seen, everyone mismanages their money. If we had basic income, I would guess 90%+ would eventually get their shit together. 10 people needing food because they can’t manage money is better than 100 people needing food because they don’t have money.
CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 day ago
Yeah, some of them need assisted living as well.