One of the major factors to consider here is that public schools in the US are not equally funded by number of students. Instead, most of the funding is provided by state and local property taxes, meaning that richer areas where houses are worth a lot more, get much better funding for their schools. So while those rich areas’ school funding is probably much higher than the global median, the poorer areas’ school funding is likely much lower, in a very high cost of living country in general.
The other factor to also consider is that public schools in the US have fairly extensive athletic programs, meaning that they spend a lot of the funds to build and maintain things like American Football stadiums, swimming pools, etc., as opposed to only funding actual academic education.
References:
en.wikipedia.org/…/Public_school_funding_in_the_U…
This is the best I could find on short notice about athletic vs academic spending, and it’s only discussing teacher vs coach salaries: linkedin.com/…/more-spent-instruction-coaches-per…
cattywampas@lemm.ee 3 weeks ago
These are often for extracurricular things like school trips.
Schools are underfunded.
Mirshe@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 weeks ago
i dont think its for k-12, but its mostly for universities, and colleges.
FenrirIII@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I think #1 is sports. Have you seen some of these stadiums?
lovely_reader@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Public primary and secondary schools do not typically have stadiums.
ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
This doesn’t really address the whole of OP’s question though. They are asking why our schools are so underfunded if we are spending so much more than average per student. The maths don’t math.
fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 2 weeks ago