Make your own opening elsewhere on the package.
I dont want to enter a contract when consuming your product..
Submitted 10 months ago by Brunette6256@sh.itjust.works to mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world
https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/e9f377aa-3bdf-4949-954a-8784bbcf7542.jpeg
Comments
Iamsqueegee@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Tuuktuuk@sopuli.xyz 10 months ago
You’re still opening it.
But if you have your friend open it, then you are not opening and consuming the product.
Of course, with such draconian rules, one should not drink that stuff anyway.
danc4498@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Open it. Return it. Repeat.
blackbarn@lemmy.zip 10 months ago
“I went to the url but it was just a 404, honest. No terms, no conditions”
Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
Write on the money you used to purchase this by accepting this money you agree to the terms of service…
Eat shit turdblossoms.
Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Telling us the product so we could avoid it would be useful.
Allero@lemmy.today 10 months ago
Some Vital Proteins product, it seems.
half_fiction@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
Other people are saying it’s Vital Proteins, apparently.
DarkCloud@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Some one should sue them for the maximum highest costs calculable for the travel time of having to return their products buying a new substitute brand, and going back home + legal fees.
Then that person should buy the product again to see if there’s still an agreement in place, and sue them again.
Professorozone@lemmy.world 10 months ago
This is a real thing?
Zanz@lemmy.ml 10 months ago
Lg tried it on refrigerators, even though refrigerators are not delivered in boxes.So the customer never receives them. The delayed or denied every warranty claim on their stupid 2 stage refrigerant pump, then said since the customer opened the box with the terms agreement that they couldn’t sue. It took more than a year to resolve just that there could be a class action lawsuit against LG.
Professorozone@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I’m gonna need some good news soon. This dystopia just keeps getting worse and worse.
Landless2029@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I had one of these fridges. The pumps even got an extended warranty since they failed so often. Mine died on year 6 of the 5 year standard MFG and it still got fixed for free because of the class action lawsuit.
I learned about the lawsuit after the fact too.
UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 10 months ago
No LG appliances, no Samsung appliances… any other brands to avoid?
CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 10 months ago
Ah! that one of the worst parts of the internet, and they’ve figured out a way to make it real.
At least they mention the arbitration upfront, I guess.
catty@lemmy.world 10 months ago
What is it?
vxx@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Delevoping liver issues, that’s what it is.
Zetta@mander.xyz 10 months ago
This got me curious because I’ve never heard of this, atleast according to this study it **does not cause liver issues ** if you use it properly, aka you exercise and don’t just drink it casually.
“The results showed that when whey protein is used in an uninformed manner and without exercising, adverse effects on the liver may occur by increasing the apoptotic signal in the short term and increasing inflammatory markers and hepatotoxicity in the long term.” - link
Cherry@piefed.social 10 months ago
Vital proteins take themselves a bit serious. I’d send it back. Terms and conditions my @$$.
Idiot behavior from self important companies should not be rewarded.
flandish@lemmy.world 10 months ago
return it after opening and consuming. the text does not say if you do not agree do not open. nor does it say you can’t agree, open, then disagree.
Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 10 months ago
[deleted]Bgugi@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I think you can figure this one out…
CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 10 months ago
It’s in the “agreement”.
gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Lmfao protein additives (or whatever that is) now come with a EULA…? What a time to be alive 🫠
TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 10 months ago
They’re bringing back Prima Nocta.
Windex007@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I have completely agreed to the terms of 500 INTERNAL SERVER ERROR.
gressen@lemmy.zip 10 months ago
Has this been revealed after opening product? What a shit company. Are customers expected to read the T&C’s every time someone opens the packaging? FYI, the page mentioned links to 4 additional pages and one of them is a 404.
floo@retrolemmy.com 10 months ago
What is this ridiculous product?
Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
An unregulated “nutritional” supplement. If it puts you on dialysis for the rest of your life - arbitration only and the best they can offer is a 25% discount on your next purchase. Limit 2.
appropriateghost@lemmy.ml 10 months ago
hilarious. I think they’re doing you a favor so you don’t have to buy this product ever again
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 10 months ago
Is that even legal?
MotoAsh@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Almost certainly not. Just like click-through terms (terms that are offered only by link with an Ok button) are not enforceable. It’s just there to dissuade those that assume it has any weight, which isclikely most people that are not lawyers or filthy rich who would consult a lawyer anyways if they got hurt.
It’s almost certainly on similar legal grounds to a cease and decist letter. You’re not being sued, you’re just being warned that they don’t like you via legalese.
PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au 10 months ago
I would have thought that that applied to the Uber wrongful death suit also, but at least one court decided that type of click-through terms were binding even though it was clearly a bunch of shit.
Although, it was overturned later because it's a bunch of shit. But it was at least a debate.
ayyy@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Depends: how poor are you?
JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 10 months ago
No, but they can use it to drag out the court case until you run out of money.
ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
It probably isn’t legally binding, but is enough to get most folks off their back.
Kissaki@feddit.org 10 months ago
You can disagree to the terms by pulling it open the other way around.
tisktisk@piefed.social 10 months ago
Did... Did someone MAKE you buy that?
spankmonkey@lemmy.world 10 months ago
It sure looks like this is displayed after peeling back the very top layer that is still slightly attached at the top right in the image.
So they most likely did not know this was a thing when they purchased it.
m3t00@lemmy.world 10 months ago
a kidney or other superfluous organs. mmm fruity
axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe 10 months ago
Next there will be cookie banners
neidu3@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Alright then, dear trusted canopener: We have a mission to perform at the other end.
Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 10 months ago
Open it from the bottom.
Smoogs@lemmy.world 10 months ago
And then get weirdly surprised and entitled about it when someone does do something about it.
ScatterBrain@lemmy.world 10 months ago
This is what I imagine buying kratom is like
Psythik@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Not really. They just hand you the powder in a pouch and say “that’ll be $16.42, please”.
LifeOfChance@lemmy.world 10 months ago
So when my underage child opens this what’s the plan? Clearly theyre not old enough to enter into an “legally” binding agreement, right?