French immigrants are eating our pets!
…you know people made fake picture before image generation, right?
Submitted 3 weeks ago by vsis@feddit.cl to [deleted]
https://feddit.cl/pictrs/image/7c97195b-8dba-4958-9813-590ed33dee63.png
French immigrants are eating our pets!
…you know people made fake picture before image generation, right?
They made fake pictures before computers existed too.
This obviously can’t be true, how did they do it without Photoshop? /s
I’ve seen the cave paintings deer and horses everywhere but when I look around nothing but rocks and trees.
“We investigated ourselves and found nothing wrong.”
Back2thefuture_iknowthisone.png
That’s a song by the police, right?
Iseewhatyoudidthere.jpg
LOL
Miao
Ignorant Americans, never even heard of the common snailcat
Where the fuck are you from that they aren’t called catsnails? Odd. Been catsnails here since I can remember.
I don’t get it. Maybe it’s right? Maybe a human made this?
The picture doesn’t have to be “real”, it just has to be non-AI. Maybe this was made in Blender and Photoshop or something.
Or maybe your expectations from ai detection are too high.
No spooky eyes, no extra limbs, no eery smile? - 100% real, genuine photograph! 👍
I have two of those cats. I still can’t catch them when its time to go to bed.
It’s a snat. They are not easy to catch, because they are fast. Also, they never and on their shell.
cute snat…
That’s clearly a cail
Are we all looking at the same snussy?
We get them a lot around here. They don’t make for good pets, but they keep the borogoves at bay.
Which is great, honestly. Borogoves themselves are fine, but it’s not worth the risk letting them get all mimsy.
I wanted to get a cat but I discovered I was allergic to the slime trail.
Such a cute kitty snail! Can you post just the picture?
Its an “AI generated image at snail” :3
yeah just shopped
It’s not, look at the shell
That’s a normal housecat. Not sure what people are confused about
Chat is the picture real?
It’s a real valid picture in png format.
HAS SCIENCE GONE TO FAR?!
Clearly AI is on the verge of taking over the world.
Well duh it detects AI generated images that are at scale and that snail cat is way too small for it
That is a weird looking rabbit
It has been 0
days since classified military gene research has been leaked by interrogating ai detecting models
The AI was trained on a combination of cat videos and sponge bob
There are a bunch of reasons why this could happen. First, it’s possible to “attack” some simpler image classification models; if you get a large enough sample of their outputs, you can mathematically derive a way to process any image such that it won’t be correctly identified. There have also been reports that even simpler processing, such as blending a real photo of a wall with a synthetic image at very low percent, can trip up detectors that haven’t been trained to be more discerning. But it’s all in how you construct the training dataset, and I don’t think any of this is a good enough reason to give up on using machine learning for synthetic media detection in general; in fact this example gives me the idea of using autogenerated captions as an additional input to the classification model. The challenge there, as in general, is trying to keep such a model from assuming that all anime is synthetic, since “AI artists” seem to be overly focused on anime and related styles…
Honestly, they should fight fire with fire? Another vision model (like Qwen VL) would catch this
You can ask it “does this image seem fake?” and it would look at it, reason something out and probably conclude it isn’t, instead of… I dunno, looking for smaller patters or whatever their internal model does?
So only 2% "not likely to be AI-generated or deepfake"... that means that it's almost definitely AI, got it!? :-P
Not unclear as a whistle.
What tool is this? I assume the tool is also AI based?
So the prophecy is fulfilled
You have never seen the all elusive catsnail? Bummer you should look harder.
Isn’t there a whole thing about if you average out colors on AI generated photos you get a uniform beige color?
I don’t get why these tools don’t just do that but I guess you got to keep the marketing up of using AI to find a solution.
Either that’s not true of AI images or it’s true of all images. There aren’t answers that simple to this. Pixels are pixels.
It is absolutely not true of all AI images. I’d be surprised if it’s even true about most AI images.
What? That’s some extreme logic.
First of all why would it be true if all images? Real photos would have variance of contrast and color in different ways.
I was slightly off anyways it was about a eeaging contrast
Instead of engaging the conversation you just say pixels are pixels? Luke that means something smart?
pennomi@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
I mean, it could be a manual photoshop job. Just because it’s not AI doesn’t mean it’s real.
But also the detector is probably wrong - it’s likely an AI image using a different model than the detector was trained to detect.
db2@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
There were a lot of really good images like that well before AI. Anyone remember Photoshop Friday?
Paradachshund@lemmy.today 3 weeks ago
There’s a sort of… Sheen, to a lot AI images. Obviously you can prompt this away if you know what you’re doing, but its developing a bit of a look to my eye when people don’t do that.
Sparky@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
Can we bring that back?
Venator@lemmy.nz 2 weeks ago
The shell looks ai generated though, if it was photoshopped it would’ve been a snail shell used for the source image.
arken@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
It could, but the double spiral in the shell indicates AI to me. Snail shells don’t grow like that. If it was a manual job, someone would have used a picture of a real shell.
pennomi@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Agreed. The aggressive depth of field is another smoking gun that usually indicates an AI image.
rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 3 weeks ago
Snail shells don’t grow like that but this is clearly a snat, not a snail.
fishbone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 weeks ago
Also the fact that the grain on the side of the shell is perpendicular to the grain on the top, and it changes where the cat ear comes up in front of it.
Very telltale sign of AI is a change of pattern in something when a foreground object splits it.
Not saying it’s always a guarantee, but it’s a common quirk and it’s pretty easy to identify.