lily33
@lily33@lemm.ee
- Comment on Spotify Premium User Slams App Over Audiobook Feature 3 weeks ago:
15 hours for what period of time? The article mentions they’d refill in two days…
- Comment on OpenAI says it’s “impossible” to create useful AI models without copyrighted material 5 months ago:
skeptical that it’s technologically feasible to search through the entire training corpus, which is an absolutely enormous amount of data
Google, DuckDuckGo, Bing, etc. do it all the time.
- Comment on OpenAI says it’s “impossible” to create useful AI models without copyrighted material 5 months ago:
The infraction should be in what’s generated. Because the interest by itself also enables many legitimate, non-infracting uses - which don’t involve generating creative work at all - or where the creative input comes from the user.
- Comment on OpenAI says it’s “impossible” to create useful AI models without copyrighted material 5 months ago:
I didn’t say anything about AIs being humans.
- Comment on OpenAI says it’s “impossible” to create useful AI models without copyrighted material 5 months ago:
But AI isn’t all about generating creative works. It’s a store of information that I can query - a bit like searching Google; but understands semantics, and is interactive. It can translate my own text for me - in which case all the creativity comes from me, and I use it just for its knowledge of language. Many people use it to generate boilerplate code, which is pretty generic and wouldn’t usually be subject to copyright.
- Comment on OpenAI says it’s “impossible” to create useful AI models without copyrighted material 5 months ago:
- This is not REALLY about copyright - this is an attack on free and open AI models, which would be IMPOSSIBLE if copyright was extended to cover the case of using the works for training.
- It’s not stealing. There is literally no resemblance between the training works and the model. IP rights have been continuously strengthened due to lobbying over the last century and are already absurdly strong, I don’t understand why people on here want so much to strengthen them ever further.
- Comment on Threads? 6 months ago:
threads.net is currently blocked. You can see a complete list of blocked instances here. There was a discussion about this when threads first announced plans to federate.
- Comment on lemm.ee plans for mitigating image upload abuse 10 months ago:
From the OP, it seems the filters don’t flag CSAM. They flag any NSFW. That said, keep in mind that the filter would also have false negatives, so if people want to slip NSFW though, some can end up there even without such option.
But I don’t mind the content staying hidden until a mod reviewed is in such cases. The false positive rate of the filter would likely be small, so there wouldn’t be too many things that need review.
- Comment on lemm.ee plans for mitigating image upload abuse 10 months ago:
A way to deal with false positives of an ML NSFW scanner would be: Once per day, each user can “overwrite” the scanner. If a user is caught abusing this, they get banned.