Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

⁨125⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨admin@science.social⁩ to ⁨technology@beehaw.org⁩

https://storage.science.social/null/c66c7435-a5f6-43a9-bb70-e3f3538a5e59.webp

Mastodon’s founder cedes control, refuses to become next Musk or Zuckerberg

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/01/mastodon-becomes-nonprofit-to-make-sure-its-never-ruined-by-billionaire-ceo/

@technology@beehaw.org @news@beehaw.org @usnews@beehaw.org @programming@beehaw.org
#technology #news

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • jeena@piefed.jeena.net ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Just for my understanding, wasn't OpenAI not also a nonprofit and is now a forprofit and the CEO is at least as bad as Zuckerberg?
    I understand it will make it a little bit harder, but nothing prevents Mastodon to go the OpenAI way or is the situation different in some way?

    source
    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      The main difference is that the project will be owned by the non-profit foundation. This still leaves mastodon.social in the for profit Mastodon gGmbH but Mastodon itself is safe.

      source
      • Midnitte@beehaw.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Also worth noting that this was done in Europe (not the US), so corrupting the nonprofit should be harder.

        source
      • SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Ah, of course the guy motivated by money ensures he can keep getting it.

        Let’s hope he will invest it in moderation worth a damn.

        Sadly it sounds like he’ll still be in charge of the project so he can keep ignoring user issues and pull requests that are actually useful and making changes that users don’t like, want or need.

        source
    • WaterSword@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      OpenAI is a for profit company, owned by a non profit. External investors can invest in the for profit subsidiary, but it is still owned by the non profit. Investors are only allowed a capped amount of profit. (The capped amount is still bajillions afaik). But the for profit is legally bound to follow the non-profit’s mission.

      source
      • lily33@lemm.ee ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        gizmodo.com/to-further-its-mission-of-benefitting…

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • renard_roux@beehaw.org ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      … wasn’t OpenAI not also …

      Uhm. No? Or yes? Maybe? 🤔😅

      source
      • jeena@piefed.jeena.net ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        This was me directly translating from German I think :D

        source
    • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Mastodon is also open source and decentralized, trying to turn it into anything else will meet so much resistance from the community, Mastodon will likely just get forked.

      source
  • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    There was no danger of that happening, Mr. Mastodon

    source
  • HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    That’s good on them for doing that. It is also good for Mastodon in general since it means they are building the staff that can grow the service.

    source
  • masterofn001@lemmy.ca ⁨3⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I’m going to download a sketchy Chinese app instead.

    source