The 'bias machine': Undecided voters in the US who turn to Google may see dramatically different views of the world – even when they're asking the exact same question

Submitted ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨tardigrada@beehaw.org⁩ to ⁨technology@beehaw.org⁩

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20241031-how-google-tells-you-what-you-want-to-hear

Some experts say Google is just parroting your own beliefs right back to you. It may be worsening your own biases and deepening societal divides along the way.

[…]

“Google’s whole mission is to give people the information that they want, but sometimes the information that people think they want isn’t actually the most useful,” says Sarah Presch, digital marketing director at Dragon Metrics, a platform that helps companies tune their websites for better recognition from Google using methods known as “search engine optimisation” or SEO.

[…]

“> What Google has done is they’ve pulled bits out of the text based on what people are searching for and fed them what they want to read” – Sarah Presch

source

Comments

Sort:hotnew top

lily33@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

Type in "Is Kamala Harris a good Democratic candidate

and any good search engine will find results containing keywords such as “Kamala Hareris”, “Democratic”, “candidate”, and “good”.

[…] you might ask if she’s a “bad” Democratic candidate instead

In that case, of course the search engine will find results containing keywords such as “Kamala Hareris”, “Democratic”, “candidate”, and “bad”.

So the whole premise that, “Fundamentally, that’s an identical question” is just bullshit when it comes to searching. Obviously, when you put in the keyword “good”, you’ll find articles containing “good”, and if you put in the keyword “bad”, you’ll find articles containing “bad” instead.

Google will find things that match the keywords that you put in. So does DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Yahoo, whatever. That is what a good search engine is supposed to do.

I can assure you, when a search engines stop doing that, and try to give “balanced” results, according to whatever opaque criteria for “balanced” their company comes up with, that will be a nightmare scenario.

I don’t like Google, and only use google when other search engines fail. But this article is BS.

source
- crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  Ah but other than the search results there’s also a big AI summary on the top, which I’m more concerned about
  
  source
  - halm@leminal.space ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    Yeah. Be very, very afraid of people using search engines or “AI” as some Magic Eightball oracle to give them answers.
    
    source
mox@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
Beware online “filter bubbles” (2011)

ted.com/…/eli_pariser_beware_online_filter_bubble…

source
- tardigrada@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  Yeah, that’s not new, but I feel there are still many who are unaware, although I don’t understand why.
  
  source
  - mox@lemmy.sdf.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    It’s important to post these things every so often. There will never be a day when everyone already knows. :)
    
    xkcd.com/1053/
    
    source
watson387@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
Fuck Google

source
- ranandtoldthat@beehaw.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  Yes, but this issue is not one we should want Google solving. We need better media literacy education throughout life.
  
  source
  - watson387@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    I don’t disagree with you. I’m saying Google’s algorithm is part of the cause not the cure.
    
    source