Foot for thought
Low rating
Submitted 1 month ago by stenAanden@feddit.dk to [deleted]
https://feddit.dk/pictrs/image/af463a11-5314-4fab-9650-e75a239c6652.webp
Comments
WereCat@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Zizzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 month ago
Another poster said the commentor is talking about a youtuber named gabi belle, who afaik posts ZERO sexual content and even if she did that still wouldnt make her an object for your personal sexual satisfaction.
Blibly@lemmy.world 1 month ago
No you don’t understand she’s a woman showing her face therefore she’s a sex object
gnutrino@programming.dev 1 month ago
In this case I don’t think it’s her face that they’re interested in her showing…
agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
The commenter said she posted that she wanted her score on the foot rating site to be higher, which seems like pretty clear consent to objectify her feet.
new_world_odor@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Having watched Gabi, it was almost certainly a pretty obvious joke. Not surprising she blurred them, people are disgusting.
sas41@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
Hate how you’re so upvoted because not only is your information third or fourth hand depending on perspective, you also outright believe it and knit your idea of consent around such weak thread.
She’s joking, if anything this is a defeatist joke around the fact that she is nearly powerless when it cones to being objectified and sexualized without her consent, and the dark humor on display is very on brand. So the screenshotted comment, presumably a viewer of hers, should be familiar with her style of comedy and her struggles with being objectified and her likeness being misused.
So that comment is by someone who either does the exact thing to her that she doesn’t want, or they are genuinely so porn pilled that they genuinely haven’t ever picked up on what she’s talking about and are only there to objectify and sexualize her.
I would not have bothered to comment unless I knew enough about her, her content and the thought she shared surrounding these things, I suggest we all adopt this approach in the future.
SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Zero sexual content with the name like ‘Gabi Belle’? I’ve jerked off already, no need for anything extra.
phar@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I do not understand humans
red_tomato@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Humans are horny
Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 month ago
And capable of being turned on by anything. Not much more to understand than that lol
uber_chicken@lemmy.world 1 month ago
And they don’t understand you
snoons@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
So say me all too as well
58008@lemmy.world 1 month ago
My take on feets: I don’t think about them in my fantasies or anything, but if they’re there IRL, they represent a further opportunity to add to the other person’s pleasure, so I’ll have a go on them. But I don’t get turned on by the act of licking soles in and of itself. I’ve never seen a pair of feet and thought “daaaaaaaaaaamn, those are some HOT feets!” no more than I’ve seen a garden fence and thought “burn down all other fences, 'cause THIS is the one!” Although, I’m sure I’ve seen plenty of feet that caused my neutrality to dip into disgust (like my own, for example). But beyond that, I don’t think about them at all. They’re just an extra button on my controller in the indecipherable non-localised Slavic RPG that is the female orgasm.
BetterDev@programming.dev 1 month ago
You got my upvote
b_n@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Never have my thoughts been written down so accurately as right now 🤝. I can understand many other fetishes. Feet I just really struggle to comprehend. Not that that matters, more power to the foot fetishers etc.
SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Apytele@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Yeah I’ve given a footjob before. It was neither exciting nor disgusting to me but the dude loved it so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
tyranny@crazypeople.online 1 month ago
as far as I’m concerned, foot fetishists are the bravest people on earth
balderdash9@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de 1 month ago
I… don’t get it. Explain the joke?
YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 1 month ago
I think the joke is that people are nuts. I mean, imagine blurring your feet when you already have a presence on wikifeet 🙄.
^/s
snoons@lemmy.ca 1 month ago
Yes, exactly.
wowwoweowza@lemmy.world 1 month ago
So grateful not to be afflicted with this.
Blibly@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Who is this person talking about?
TheTetrapod@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I just googled to figure it out. It was a YouTuber named Gabi Belle.
TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
Oh I assumed this was about Jordan Myrick
Blibly@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Oh lol I love Gabi her vids are hilarious
Evotech@lemmy.world 1 month ago
The researcher
cypherix93@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Someone with feet.
lol_idk@piefed.social 1 month ago
Your mom
MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I watched End of Oak Street last night. Even though the characters learned that they are kinda trapped thier house, they all still kept their shoes and socks on. Found that interesting
Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 month ago
So you’re saying it’s a 1 star and you’ve unsubscribed?
FluidBeef@quokk.au 1 month ago
When’s his next movie anyway? Once Upon A Time… was pre-COVID.
DarkFuture@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I’m pretty tolerant when it comes to kinks (boy have I got some), but if you’re a foot person you’re a weirdo.
Railcar8095@lemmy.world 1 month ago
As long as you tolerate weirdos, seems consistent on my book
DarkFuture@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I totally tolerate weirdos.
RVGamer06@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Foot is pretty vanilla nowadays, the rabbit hole is way deeper than that
Grimy@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Free the feet
DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Gotta love the footies. They’re harmless and locked in. At the rabbit hole that is sexual fetishes, they just hang around the entrance… looking down.
I don’t think about feet at all, until a story like this pops up.
cabbagepatchcrabs@retrolemmy.com 1 month ago
You perfectly summed up footies, normies love to bug them for the weirdness but honestly, pretty wholesome all told.
imadethis@fedinsfw.app 1 month ago
I think we must have had very different experiences in life. I think the only fetish I ever hear about in the news in a ‘bad way’ is feet.
In the past two or three decades, I want to say there have been at least one or two stories per year about some cop in the area letting people off of tickets if they’ll let the officer lick their feet. We have incredibly large furry conventions, anime conventions, tattoo conventions, reptile owner conventions, and probably more that touch on various kinks and fetishes, but you never hear about any of those sexual shenanigans in the news… so feet fetish folks finding themselves featured on frontline feeds frequently from the news is quite the contrast.
PattyMcB@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I don’t yuk anyone’s yum except for furries. That shit is weird
Viceversa@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Not wholesome
Just not interesting
CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
They are not all wholesome. There are bad actors.
Some Non-Consensual Examples:
youtube.com/watch?v=NI_2xKI8hk4
youtube.com/watch?v=YaU81ryR8kY
youtube.com/watch?v=FUuyoQqV9JE
MrNesser@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I have this image of elmur fudd waiting for bugs bunny just so he can look at his feet
AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 month ago
The secret is out.
stenAanden@feddit.dk 1 month ago
You’re no defending foot fetishists in my comment section you are not
Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 month ago
🏴
ToiletFlushShowerScream@piefed.world 1 month ago
I’m gonna love that metaphor forever
user224@lemmy.sdf.org 1 month ago
That sounds like description of a cave diver.
f314@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I mean, the word «fetish» itself is named after feet, so they’re literally the OG.
cabbagepatchcrabs@retrolemmy.com 1 month ago
Going to acktually on you here but…
It began as:
“material object regarded with awe as having mysterious powers or being the representative of a deity that may be worshipped through it,” 1610s, fatisso, from Portuguese feitiço “charm, sorcery, allurement,” noun use of an adjective meaning “artificial.”
which eventually morphed into:
Figurative sense of “something irrationally revered, object of blind devotion” appears to be an extension made by the New England Transcendentalists (1837). For sexual sense (1897), see fetishism.
Which…checks out in terms of our current understandings of the word. (But still is used as an object in magic in other circles).
RedStamp@piefed.social 1 month ago
I don’t think that’s correct. It seems like it originated from a magical context: something that puts a sexual “spell” on you
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_fetishism#History