Buddahriffic
@Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
- Comment on a very tasty snack 2 days ago:
Oh is that why people say you wouldn’t like hot dogs if you saw how they were made, because they are just spam in tube form?
- Comment on a very tasty snack 2 days ago:
“If you’re not a fan, bam! Drop a few used matches in that can and it will taste less like plain ol spam!”
- Comment on Yeah, right 2 days ago:
There’s a game I’ve played that was bad for this but I can’t remember which one it was. Like all options looked neutral and reasonable but would lead to the character doing wildly different things. Or ones that looked friendly would be the opposite. Like if you choose “Agree with them”, you might get “Yeah, you’re right, you fucking asshole.”
Though it is a lot funnier describing it now than it was experiencing it, in the moment I was like “wait, no, wtf are you doing?”. Seems like a game designed more for people watching than the one playing.
- Comment on Retro StarCraft prizes 2 days ago:
It’s just a cleaver, a cutting board, and a lead apron with a hole in it.
- Comment on Retro StarCraft prizes 2 days ago:
Someone tipped me a tiny amount of some crypto coin on there, too. I did set up a wallet but then kinda forgot about it. Maybe I can pay off my place. Lol I remember it being one of the dumb ones, but tbh I thought they were all dumb. Still do, even if I did accidentally get rich lol.
Oh wow, just checked it. It was about 0.15 BCH and yeah, it has gone up considerably since I got it. It was worth maybe a buck or two, apparently it’s worth almost $80 USD today! That’s like a downpayment on a stick of RAM!
- Comment on Performance enhancement 3 days ago:
Or suits so good at flight camera people need to also be pro ski jump++ level to keep up with them. Better, actually, because they have to do it while keeping the athlete in frame on a camera.
- Comment on it's a long distance relationship 4 days ago:
You want to cut Schrödinger’s box in half? This kills the cat, unless the box is big enough for the cat to avoid the blade, in which case you’ve opened the box and the cat is probably going to need some convincing to get out from under whatever furniture it can find.
- Comment on 5 days ago:
I live in a blue area but I never agreed that the week starts with Sunday. It’s clearly Monday and I dgaf who says otherwise.
- Comment on An oopsie occured 5 days ago:
They’d never what, attempt to profit off of an emotional reaction by presenting an option that most wouldn’t even have thought of on their own but kinda makes you feel guilty to decline?
- Comment on Man posts his incorrect opinion online 1 week ago:
I think Japan (and Korea?) need their own category where you take your shoes off but then your host provides you with clean sandals to wear inside.
- Comment on Im curious what they will come up with 1 week ago:
Alternatively, Cartman is in the files (because Epstein used his paint the walls in shit revenge service to prank one of the actual visitors to the island) and when told he can make the girls do anything he wants, he gets one to make fun of Kyle on video, where he is clearly being an asshole to her.
And Butters is also in the file because they tried to recruit him after he went viral for What, What, In the Butt, which Cartman latches on to and spends the whole episode trying to help Butters clear his name (so that he can clear his own name in the process).
Also Randy is on the list because he was trying to get them to sign Tegrity Farms up as their official weed supplier and he spends the episode trying to supress the information entirely but gets Streisand effected hard, leading to the follow up episode where Trump tries to pin the whole thing on Randy (and everything else, too, and starts bringing up shit that isn’t even public). In the end, Randy gets “one of the harshest punishments ever given to a rich person”: a fine for $3.50, and everyone realizes that it wasn’t a judge presiding over the case, but a 3-story crustacean known as the Lochness Monster and the episode ends with everyone getting together to yell at Nessie (and the incident is never mentioned again).
- Comment on Your teenager AND your husband 1 week ago:
Or they might develop cooking skills, which enables you to turn even the healthiest of ingredients into delicious junk.
- Comment on Get that silicussy 1 week ago:
What mass had a force exerted on it over a distance?
- Comment on The cops pay Anon a visit 1 week ago:
Personally, I think it should work like this: any evidence found is admissible in court, but if the cops broke the law to get it, there are legal consequences for them.
The current system is abusable if you have connections with police willing to break some laws to make smoking guns inadmissible to court, and even if it’s an honest mistake, the whole “if they looked when they weren’t allowed to, you get away with whatever they saw” is just a second bad consequence to the public, assuming the crime was one of the harmful to the public ones.
- Comment on Anon looks back 1 week ago:
That loser mindset is the issue, not the practice date. With a mindset like that, the rest is irrelevant because he’ll just sabotage any chances by being too needy and demanding proof of affection or bouncing between hot and cold, either of which eventually drives the other person away.
Someone who is entirely repulsed by you won’t offer a pity date and especially not a pity bj. They might decide they don’t like you that much anymore based on the date itself, they might even try claiming they never liked you if they feel embarrassed, but I’d argue there were selfish motives hidden behind the “practice date” label.
- Comment on Anon finds a sugar daddy 1 week ago:
I mean, the dad did ghost both of them.
- Comment on Usually a horrible interaction for all involved 1 week ago:
Because the language policing trend didn’t happen naturally but was another angle of the divide and conquer, deflecting people to waste time policing language instead of useful endevors while alienating not only people who disagreed about the underlying values but also people tired of people bitching about their use of language.
They needed all of the stops to pull off the elections and one of them was amplifying the most obnoxious aspects of the left, which also affected their credibility, which was important to get the opposition to ignore the warnings about the obvious signs of fascism.
And right now, that same strategy is being used to keep the disillusioned from joining up with the left by amplifying the “fuck you, you’re irredeemable” responses to the ones starting to see Trump for who he is.
- Comment on lightbulbs 1 week ago:
Not doubting you, but how do you define the quality of the light?
- Comment on "Capitalism rewards innovation!" 1 week ago:
Any kind of power can corrupt. This isn’t an argument against trying, but for any systems of power to be built with mechanisms to make it more difficult to entrench that power so it doesn’t end up used against those it is intended to help.
Though I don’t know what kind of defense there is against a cult of personality.
- Comment on How accurate is this? 1 week ago:
I bet that the question depends more on management than the customers or type of work.
Like a good manager that doesn’t take shit from customers will be way better than the ones that bend over backwards for any complaint.
Same thing for the ones who are chill as long as things are getting done vs the one that is more interested in seeing the illusion of work being done even if things are neglected (because all their attention is making sure people look busy rather than really understanding the work to evaluate results).
- Comment on Anon wants to talk about video games 2 weeks ago:
I’m planning on going back to a restaurant I was at last week… But to try one of the other dishes that looked good that I didn’t try (even though the dish I had might be the best fish dish I’ve ever tried). But I have struggled with trying new things at restaurants in the past because it’s hard to commit to a mystery dish that might be good vs the known dish that I know I’ll like (usually burgers or pasta).
But after trying a taster menu at a michelin star restaurant (not the one I might go back to today), which was full of dishes I’d never order on my own but every single one of them were amazing, I have an easier time taking that risk.
But I never blamed anyone other than myself for not trying new dishes before that.
- Comment on Nova Launcher unashamedly inserts malware ads into your home screen now. 2 weeks ago:
Thanks for taking the time to write that out, yyprum!
It sounds interesting. I switched to O launcher when Nova was sold and the writing was on the wall, but it was overly simplistic and I didn’t continue using it when I got a pixel and moved to graphene, but I’m neutral on the default launcher it has. I’ll check this one out when I have some time, it sounds compelling.
- Comment on Anon wants to talk about video games 2 weeks ago:
Yeah, I don’t get that. I can’t even think of very many shows that I’ve watched through twice, let alone repeatedly. If we limit it to shows where the second watch is just for myself and not to show someone else, Breaking Bad is the only one I can think of.
And even expanding to shows watched multiple times to show someone else, the list expands to Lost, Malcolm in the Middle, Futurama, Naruto, Wandavision, and Loki.
Oh and I guess MXC, I was playing the twitch channel that was nothing but all MXC episodes on a loop for a while, though that was more because there were enough episodes that it took a while before it seemed repetitive.
- Comment on Anon wants to talk about video games 2 weeks ago:
VR or non?
GT7 is one of the games where the immersion is both great (you’re just in a car that is moving, so it’s normal to just sit in one place while doing this) but also dissapointing (would be awesome to feel those Gs).
- Comment on Norway anon pirates 2 weeks ago:
I’m impressed with all the people who watch TV because everyone knows step 1 is to learn how to build a TV.
- Comment on Nova Launcher unashamedly inserts malware ads into your home screen now. 2 weeks ago:
Can you elaborate a bit on what makes it hard to learn and what is so nice about it once you do? I didn’t see much for details on the linked page.
- Comment on Noooooo 2 weeks ago:
On the flip side, it takes longer to type the text than it does to say it, plus verbal communication can be two ways even when the talking is mostly on one side because you can add acknowledgements when you understand without interrupting or you can interrupt when something is said that you don’t follow.
I do better with text myself, but communication is something where you need to meet in the middle, assuming you’re open to communication in the first place. If you just don’t want to communicate, then the easiest to blow off is the preferred method. Which actually is another reason I personally like text communication, because I can ignore it in the moment and get back to it later, but you can do this with calls by asking to schedule a call instead of taking it right then.
- Comment on Correlation equals causation 2 weeks ago:
Logic classes should be one of the mandatory ones.
- Comment on Do people eat this? 2 weeks ago:
For a while, I was toasting sandwhiches by stacking the top bread piece under the bottom one with topings on top of it. You end up with a sandwich (with actual sandwich toppings) just toasted on the inside and soft on the outside.
I love the texture just like I loved putting plain potato chips between two pieces of bread. Soft then crunch.
- Comment on Anon likes pizza 2 weeks ago:
A $1 pizza sounds like the kind of thing you get if you don’t want your kids to love pizza.