Dude outed himself when he told Janice his birthday was the 35th of March.
King forgot his crown
Submitted 23 hours ago by Stamets@lemmy.world to [deleted]
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/6d02fbab-b823-4bc0-b2bb-bdd3bdbcb23a.jpeg
Comments
Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 16 hours ago
hark@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
We need to ban birthdays so this never happens again.
Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
Monkey’s paw curls. Now abortions are legal and forced.
ballgoat@lemmy.zip 16 hours ago
I thought Monkeys Paw had adverse outcomes.
WereCat@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
So… We will be just spawns now?
foodconsumer@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
I’m stupid, can someone explain to me how this is illegal? Like morally questionable I get, but how is it illegal?
tempest@lemmy.ca 16 hours ago
According to a quick Google fraud in Japan is
obtaining property or illicit economic advantages through deceit.
Gifts I assume are property here
SPRUNT@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
Jesus Christ! Can we get some of that law in the US?!
Part4@infosec.pub 5 hours ago
Presumably he had to give 35 presents too.
IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
I’m definitely not a legal expert, especially for Japan.
but this sounds like a con artist.
TheBat@lemmy.world 20 hours ago
At the same time?
NatakuNox@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
In one bed no less. Must be an Alaska king
Brekky@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
Take it he wasn’t reciprocating the gifts?
ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 18 hours ago
I think the only way this makes sense is that he’d start dating someone, say his birthday is coming up, dump then after receiving the gift and repeating the process.
daggermoon@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
Do you get someone a gift if you’re only known them for a week? Serious question.
altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 hours ago
Is that the gift economy I keep hearing about?
IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
no
FelixCress@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
Genius.
some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 21 hours ago
Kinda clever.
knight_alva@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
Hoping that isn’t real because that’s kind of an f-ed up definition for fraud. Also, what a legend.
onslaught545@lemmy.zip 22 hours ago
It’s pretty much the textbook definition of fraud. What are you talking about?
He intentionally deceived 35 people for material gain.
knight_alva@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
It’s a poor definition because gift exchanges are strictly voluntary and non-reciprocal engagements. I’m not saying what he did was ok or even legal in other contexts. My only point is that I wouldn’t consider this fraud because the victims were not compelled to give. This isn’t a Nigerian prince scam where the victims were promised greater returns at a later date. These victims gave with the expectation of monetary loss.
Zahtu@feddit.org 21 hours ago
I do Not See the fraud here. If He would have given the Girls His real Birthday, He would have still received the Same amount of Gifts. Nothing would have changed in exchanging the Gifts.
The only Thing, which it probably helped at, was that He could plan ahead for the birthdays, avoiding a Potential meet-in of each girl, that He dated on the Same Day. The only Thing He is gullible of ist deceiving the Woman on their Relationship. Which is Not an offenes in a legal Sense. There is no punishment for 2-timing, so 35-timing should Not have either
FelixCress@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
That’s what politicians do every election. Just saying.
RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 20 hours ago
There is no mention of any consideration (a legal term meaning he didn’t promise them anything in return) provided by the “boyfriend”.
This would not be fraud under English common law.
ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 21 hours ago
Well there’s your shady gray bit right in the definition. Is it unlawful to lie about your birthday?
RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 21 hours ago
Does either of those fill though?
NatakuNox@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
Found the guy with 35 girlfriend.
knight_alva@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
I’m down to 28 now. Apparently some of them saw this thread …
cRazi_man@europe.pub 22 hours ago
Look at that smile. He regrets nothing.
Also: Daily Mail source?..this story is entirely fiction and made up, guaranteed.
RidderSport@feddit.org 22 hours ago
Fraud is a very complicated crime. I absolutely hate that I need to know the basic for my law degree as it fills a thousand pages of commentary literature in just one of the largest German legal commentaries because it’s just that complicated.
knight_alva@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
As I said in another reply, my thinking is thus:
It’s a poor definition because gift exchanges are strictly voluntary and non-reciprocal engagements. I’m not saying what he did was ok or even legal in other contexts. My only point is that I wouldn’t consider this fraud because the victims were not compelled to give. This isn’t a Nigerian prince scam where the victims were promised greater returns at a later date. These victims gave with the expectation of monetary loss.
Dreaming_Novaling@lemmy.zip 21 hours ago
This guy cheated on 35 different women for gifts and you go:
I hope that’s a /s 😔
usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 19 hours ago
There’s a certain threshold when you’re no longer upset, just impressed. Like if someone ate my slice of cake vs they ate the entire fridge.
knight_alva@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
I mean the article itself is apparently satire so yeah.