That entire family is so fucking gross.
Not even close
Submitted 19 hours ago by MTZ@lemmy.world to [deleted]
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/1a2ca1b2-f063-4153-b793-d625781d3dc3.jpeg
Comments
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 19 hours ago
generallynonsensical@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
Well, she was most likely trafficked herself. So it’s extra gross when she hides/defends others doing it.
zerobot@lemmy.wtf 18 hours ago
makes me feel dirty just thinking about any of them, there is something deeply disgusting about these “people”
TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
SirSamuel@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
But I am wearing her underwear
funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 10 hours ago
not that i really care but in his defense he asked what sexual relations meant, they gave a definition and what he did with Lewinsky didn’t match that definition…
Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
The thing about the Epstein files that a lot of people don’t realize is that the fact it’s a scandal means that there’s an opportunity to get justice at some point if in the future even if the system is broken. In a lot of places around the world, this shit is legalized and nobody cares. For example, in my home country of Iraq all of this is legal and a lot of powerful religious clerics do the same shit as these criminals, and nobody bats an eye. We live in a depraved world that’s governed by the wicked.
zerobot@lemmy.wtf 18 hours ago
this is the first time i heard her talk and probably the last and I can’t be the only one. she must know about something that will come out and thankfully handled it like an absolute troglodyte so we all know now to pay close attention
8oow3291d@feddit.dk 18 hours ago
Anti-SLAPP suit is gearing up very soon: feddit.dk/post/20969245/19914002
Avicenna@programming.dev 6 hours ago
lol the new joke is they waged a war on Iran to make people forget about Epstein but the war was such a catastrophe that they put Epstein back on the table to make people forget about the war
smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works 19 hours ago
Come ON, we’re SUPPOSED to stop talking about it!!
iThinkDifferentThanU@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
you’re thinking of another club that should have come already
switcheroo@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
None of the other first lady’s HAD TO MAKE a speech about not being a sex trafficker…
bstix@feddit.dk 16 hours ago
Neither did she. Apparently she just felt the need to do it for reasons unknown to anyone.
CannonFodder@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
Maybe she’s poking the bear; getting Epstein back in the news cycle. She probably detests Donald a lot and would love to see him put down.
SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 14 hours ago
Yes, but aren’t you glad she did? Because I’m not.
callouscomic@lemmy.zip 16 hours ago
Woooooooooosh
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 8 hours ago
“theres nothing more suspicious than diddling kids, if you make a song about"not” diddling kids"- MAC. in this case it was a press conference.
MTZ@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
Greatest television show in human history.
jobbies@lemmy.zip 17 hours ago
Is she even in the files? Besides the photos we’ve all seen?
I didn’t know there was a debate about her relationship with Epstein or how she ended up in the US. Now I do. All she’s done is draw attention to herself.
I used to think she was a clever gold digger but now all I see is a narcissistic moron. Same as her shit-scented husband.
mumblerfish@lemmy.world 17 hours ago
My speech on me not being a sex trafficer has people asking a lot of questions already answered by my speech on how I’m not a sex trafficer
– Melania, probably
redsand@infosec.pub 15 hours ago
Ivana his 2nd wife who’s burried on the golf course is. She was a recruiter. Also Don Jr, Eric and Ivanka’s mom.
Makes sense Melania is the same
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 8 hours ago
also why Melania hates the other children.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 8 hours ago
shes her handler for putin/russia.
Saprophyte@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
Finally, a unique speech not copied from Michelle Obama.
Turns out, Michelle and her husband were never on Epstein’s island, so nothing to deny.
MrNesser@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
First thing I thought was whose got the story and when is it going to drop
daannii@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
Do you think she plagiarized it or used chatgpt
sudo@programming.dev 19 hours ago
sex trafficked 🤓
CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net 15 hours ago
I still don’t know what story she was denying. What were the images that she was saying we’re fake?
tourist@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
Muddy waters here
From what I’ve gathered
- There may be photos being released soon, and her legal team is trying to preempt it by denying it.
idk how law works, but I don’t know what preempting it is meant to do
- there is supposedly a (plausibly deepfaked) image floating around the boomer side of the internet:
I haven’t seen it nor tried to find it. Last time I checked Facebook, I learned several horrific slurs for ethnic groups I did not even know existed
- Maybe, she finally caught wind of her name being mentioned alongside Epstein
I’ve met people who just check the news and/or the internet once per year, if ever
- Some other Trump administration political strategy
I’m legit not intelligent enough to understand nor recall the explanation there
Probably a legal thing. Photos/Documents may be releasing soon
If not, yeah…
Just more bizarre
Like if I announced:
“I did not rinse my unwashed genitals in the spahetti after I cooked it”
In the middle of a family dinner.
CountVon@sh.itjust.works 14 hours ago
No one knows what story she’s denying, or what images she’s claiming are fake. The most likely possibility is that someone is preparing to release a story on the links between her and Epstein. It’s standard practice in journalism to contact the subject of a piece, inform them of the contents of that piece, and request their comments. A request for comment on an upcoming story seems a likely trigger for this reaction. The entire speech strikes me as a thinly veiled threat, essentially saying “If you publish your story I will sue you for defamation.”
DokPsy@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
Can’t sue for defamation if the commentary is either true or had reasonable belief to be so
WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
If I had a nickel for every time a first lady did this is have one nickel. It’s not a lot but it’s odd that it’s that high.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 8 hours ago
her cosmetic surgeries arnt cheap.
kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
“She’s a movie star” yeah, we know. Lesbian stuff, right?
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 8 hours ago
well TRUMP did sleep with “movie star” and paid her.
humanspiral@lemmy.ca 15 hours ago
She absolutely did not have sexual relations with these people… uhm mr Epstein, and ms Maxwell, or any of their ephebe escorts, nor passed them along to friends and acquaintances.
lechekaflan@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
She’s blyat. 😅
couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 9 hours ago
Maybe the child is Epstein’s
SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 19 hours ago
I wasn’t sure if she was guilty or not but after that speech I am.
Bunitonito@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
jobbies@lemmy.zip 17 hours ago
Its ‘nonce’. As in ‘a lot of nonces’
turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 16 hours ago
I didn’t even really consider her involvement until this week, now I am assuming she was in pretty deep
QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works 15 hours ago
My “not involved in human trafficking” t-shirt has people asking a lot of questions already answered by my t-shirt