smuuthbrane
@smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works
- Comment on Seedless Catholics Against Watermelons? 3 days ago:
Why can’t everybody just rind their own business?
- Comment on Seedless Catholics Against Watermelons? 3 days ago:
The genoseed hasn’t been talked about enough.
- Comment on Seedless Catholics Against Watermelons? 3 days ago:
I dunno, while I support everyone’s right to their own beliefs, some of their past actions and even current doctrine do not sit well with me.
The Catholics aren’t much better.
- Comment on Oh, oh no no no 1 week ago:
No more high warp travel, Brother and Sister.
- Comment on Anon hates aluminum 1 week ago:
You’re permitted to believe so.
- Comment on Anon hates aluminum 1 week ago:
WRONG
- Comment on Sci-Fi Short Film “Slaughterbots” | DUST 3 weeks ago:
Oh man, that’s a throwback. Gotta be at least a decade, right? And now here we are watching Ukraine defend itself with drones. Nothing close to what’s depicted here, of course.
- Comment on assume the position 4 weeks ago:
Right there with you.
unchecked drooling intensifies
- Comment on Is this relatable to anyone? 4 weeks ago:
Being a monk/nun/hermit/recluse is still an option in this day and age. Go for it.
- Comment on positivity 1 month ago:
Those are just complex.
- Comment on Scallops 1 month ago:
Ok wanna hear my theory on angels?
First, this presumes all accounts are true, so if you can’t get by that, stop here.
The people on record of having seen angels describe them as having “wings” and “eyes”, however as these people were very likely agricultural in nature (farmers, herders, etc.) they may have simply described what they saw with the closest analogies they had. What they actually saw could have been something much different, but so far beyond their experience that they couldn’t describe them any other way.
Hypothesis: angels are actually higher dimensional beings that exist in more than 3 dimensions, and intersect part of their being to our 3 dimensions in order to interact with us. “Wings” and “eyes”, along with “wheels within wheels” could be undulations, harmonics, ripples, echoes, sympathetic frequencies of their actual presence that we interpret as best we can. It’s like when the sphere visits Flatland, we are seeing multidimensional cross sections of them, which give them such an otherworldly appearance.
- Comment on positivity 1 month ago:
They’re not negative, thus they’re positive.
- Comment on Duolingo is wild 2 months ago:
I figured it out. Based on the KLD, it would be “qaHoH jIneH”. It’s a special case.
- Comment on Duolingo is wild 2 months ago:
STOP PUSHING YOUR DIPLOMATIC AGENDA, DUOLINGO!!
- Comment on Duolingo is wild 2 months ago:
I know all the right words for “want” and “kill”, I’m just not advanced enough to be able to correctly say “I want to kill you”. Maybe “SoH HoH jIneH”? I have SO much to learn.
- Comment on Duolingo is wild 2 months ago:
And yet the Klingon lessons are “the men and women walk” and “Martok and Torg respect Kahless” and “the soldier repaired Mara’s robot”.
- Comment on jants 2 months ago:
Not Hot Jants?
- Comment on jants 2 months ago:
These are too long for me, can I make short jants?
- Comment on 👁️👁️ Evolution 👁️👁️ 2 months ago:
We need to get stoned. In a controlled manner. For science!!
- Comment on 👁️👁️ Evolution 👁️👁️ 2 months ago:
So Dune is right, Spice exists, and that’s how we access other dimensions? WILD.
- Comment on Just thinking about what to cook 2 months ago:
Those are all cooked already. Just serve 'em.
- Comment on 👁️👁️ Evolution 👁️👁️ 2 months ago:
Ok wanna hear my theory on angels?
First, this presumes all accounts are true, so if you can’t get by that, stop here.
The people on record of having seen angels describe them as having “wings” and “eyes”, however as these people were very likely agricultural in nature (farmers, herders, etc.) they may have simply described what they saw with the closest analogies they had. What they actually saw could have been something much different, but so far beyond their experience that they couldn’t describe them any other way.
Hypothesis: angels are actually higher dimensional beings that exist in more than 3 dimensions, and intersect part of their being to our 3 dimensions in order to interact with us. “Wings” and “eyes”, along with “wheels within wheels” could be undulations, harmonics, ripples, echoes, sympathetic frequencies of their actual presence that we interpret as best we can. It’s like when the sphere visits Flatland, we are seeing multidimensional cross sections of them, which give them such an otherworldly appearance.
- Comment on Would a Submarine Work as a Spaceship? 2 months ago:
- Comment on Could plants/trees be an evil alien species that came to earth and made us dependent on them ? 3 months ago:
You’d need to explain how they’re evil. We use them as a resource, as food, as an oxygen source, as shade, as animal habitat and food… even if they had “evil” intentions I don’t see what they would have been or how it wood have played out.
- Comment on [deleted] 3 months ago:
You’d think they’d be looking for non-organic options. Go full cybernetic, shed their mortal, diseased bodies entirely.
- Comment on look within 3 months ago:
BONK
- Comment on A time-honored tradition 3 months ago:
If you freeze it and eat it later that’s called meal prep.
- Comment on Surely you can't be serious. 4 months ago:
Don’t watch A Grown Name Naked, it’s misleading. It’s just a minidoc about the plaque on the Pioneer space probes.
- Comment on "Tag someone who needs to see this" 4 months ago:
You are entirely right.
- Comment on "Tag someone who needs to see this" 4 months ago:
“Sperm chaser” - that drinking a shot then giving a BJ and swallowing?