explosions

Comments

• Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Can’t see the other side- if it’s a 2 dimensional representation of a 3 dimensional object in can still be accurate because of perspective.

  source

  • KazuchijouNo@lemy.lol ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    My thoughts precisely, they are just assumimg this is just a 2D circle, when in reality it’s more likely to be a 3D sphere. They aren’t accounting for the area of a 3D object, we don’t even know the thickness of the “slices” that are flying.

    source
• sverit@lemmy.ml ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Sphere vs circle

  source
• davidgro@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Generally explosions do in fact involve an object suddenly increasing in volume (with corresponding decrease in density)

  Said objects typically become partially gaseous, but if the rest of it is porous then it’s not unusual at all for that to increase in volume also.

  Easy example: popcorn.

  source
• CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Neither does popcorn.

  source
• Rivalarrival@lemmy.today ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Why assume it started off as a sphere? Everything makes sense if it started off as an irregular blob.

  source

  • fallingcats@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    It might well have started our as a sphere. But you also need to rotate pieces in the third dimension of you want to pay the sphere back together.

    source
• mindbleach@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Sphere looks like circle. Chop sphere in half, lay flat, looks like two circles. BOOM, Banach-Tarski!

  source
• apotheotic@beehaw.org ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I mean, its representing a 3 dimensional object, so a lot of those “areas” are actually volumes which can stack “behind” one another

  source
• harcesz@szmer.info ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Do you people hate the SAUCE? What sort of savagery is this?

  Here: ottawa.place/@MichaelPorter/113566528132723718

  source
• PapaStevesy@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Sure it does, it’s just not round.

  source
• mihor@lemmy.ml ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  On a similar note, I don’t know which doofus created the cancerogenic warning symbol. It’s so stupid that I didn’t understand it when I first saw it and thought it meant that it irritates breathing or something. Truly stupid.

  source

  • psud@aussie.zone ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Could you link to the symbol? It’s not on the Wikipedia list of hazard symbols

    source

    • mihor@lemmy.ml ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Yes, it’s the middle bottom one. Looks like a guy’s chest is exploding for some reason. 🙃

      source
• silverchase@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Blame Banach and Tarski

  source

  • ns1@feddit.uk ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Clearly the artist believes in the axiom of choice

    source
• Zerush@lemmy.ml ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Near

  Image

  source
• smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  It just means the explosion had so much energy some of it was converted to mass. As you cannot determine what kind of explosion that is, this explanation cannot be disproven in general terms.

  source
• And009@reddthat.com ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Assumed it’s a shitpost. But it isn’t!! This is serious.

  source
• thedarkfly@feddit.nl ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I wonder who’s the artist behind the symbol

  source
• kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  That symbol must be very triggering for Superman

  source
• leftzero@lemmynsfw.com ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Popcorn.

  source
• black_mouflon@beehaw.org ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Conservation of area is not a law of nature.

  source
• user1234@lemmynsfw.com ⁨5⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Looks almost like a human heart.

  source