Ever wanted to see a human hand under a microscope?

Comments

• tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Added some of the other labels you were missing

  Image

  source

  • The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    AmComment

    source

    • rbn@sopuli.xyz ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Amburger 🍔

      source
• smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I always thought I’d be able to see more hand, not less.

  source

  • fossphi@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    You need a macroscope for that, common mistake

    source
  • Trafficone@slrpnk.net ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    This is because the microscope blocks photons. OP should use a gamma camera or x-ray to see through the microscope body.

    source
  • stephen01king@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    But microscopes does work by making you see less of the whole thing, but instead filling your vision with the little part of the thing you see.

    source
• TachyonTele@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Has science gone too far!?

  source
• NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Here’s what it looks like, magnified

  source
• Good_morning@lemmynsfw.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Get back to work rockhound

  source
• assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  I wonder what it looks like through a microscope?

  source
• milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Hand is mostly hidden from view.

  False advertising.

  source
• unreachable@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  Image

  Image

  Image

  source