stephen01king
@stephen01king@lemmy.zip
- Comment on Capsaicin 2 weeks ago:
Because our brains are amazing and can just fill out the missing word while reading.
- Comment on Proud globohomo 4 weeks ago:
It just sounds sarcastic to me.
- Comment on Equinunerous Sets 4 weeks ago:
Does that mean you cannot distinguish between the two?
- Comment on Kitty. 1 month ago:
I’m guessing you’re right next to a cat when you made this comment.
- Comment on Eureka 1 month ago:
Probably not.
- Comment on OpenAI’s new “deep-thinking” o1 model crushes coding benchmarks. 2 months ago:
And keep repeating those words until you’re satisfied. Maybe you can finally understand why they’re meaningless.
- Comment on OpenAI’s new “deep-thinking” o1 model crushes coding benchmarks. 2 months ago:
Says the guys who started throwing the insult. It’s nice that you are kind of self aware of your own shortcomings.
- Comment on OpenAI’s new “deep-thinking” o1 model crushes coding benchmarks. 2 months ago:
Oh, you actually know what your problem is, good job.
- Comment on OpenAI’s new “deep-thinking” o1 model crushes coding benchmarks. 2 months ago:
Doesn’t sound like you understand it very much, like I thought so.
- Comment on OpenAI’s new “deep-thinking” o1 model crushes coding benchmarks. 2 months ago:
What does that even mean? Neural networks have varying levels of complexity, even within the same technology. Even the same LLM model can have different number of tokens that differentiate the complexity of their operation.
So instead of using a neural network that is designed to input and output text and making it learn to output coding, which is also text, you think it’s supposed to be easier for them to make it instead analyse various video and audio input from multiple cameras, and then output the various actions that is required for it to drive a car? Does that make sense to you?
- Comment on OpenAI’s new “deep-thinking” o1 model crushes coding benchmarks. 2 months ago:
I think you’re completely wrong by still comparing skills that have no relation to each other. What’s the similarity between driving and coding that would require an LLM to be need to do one before you can believe it can do the other? Explain that leap in logic properly before you continue with your argument.
An LLM is designed to output text. Expecting them to drive to prove their ability to output code is like expecting them to dance to prove their ability to produce poems. It’s inability to do an unrelated skill has no bearing on it’s ability to do a different one. You’re basically judging a fish on its ability to walk on land, and using that as the basis to judge its ability to swim.
- Comment on OpenAI’s new “deep-thinking” o1 model crushes coding benchmarks. 2 months ago:
Most adults can also lean to code, if they actually tried. If you’re gonna add the argument that most people can’t code proficiently, most people can’t drive proficiently, either.
Also, driving and coding are completely different set of skills that it’s kinda stupid to compare them. Some people can code just fine but might never learn how to drive because they didn’t need to, so to consider driving as a prerequisite skill to coding doesn’t make sense.
- Comment on OpenAI’s new “deep-thinking” o1 model crushes coding benchmarks. 2 months ago:
No way are you going to convince me 99% of the population can drive. Go get a more accurate statistics before trying to use it to dismiss something.
- Comment on UPDATE: Here is the final design of the Humorless Toaster, that this wonderful community helped me pick yesterday! (Needless to say one of the previous versions was unintentionally problematic) 2 months ago:
I also thought it was intentional, and hilarious, but this one is definitely an improvement.
- Comment on Jackhammer 2 months ago:
By your logic, light isn’t a useful sense to possess since it’s everywhere all the time thanks to sunlight and moonlight, is that correct?
Actually, since ultraviolet radiation and light are both electromagnetic waves, they should be treated the same, shouldn’t they? It’s as if there could be a different reason why we can detect one but not the other.
- Comment on House spiders 2 months ago:
What is this, minecraft?
- Comment on Ever wanted to see a human hand under a microscope? 2 months ago:
But microscopes does work by making you see less of the whole thing, but instead filling your vision with the little part of the thing you see.
- Comment on Sonic The Hedgehog, also known as bad comic book movies enemy number one 2 months ago:
I don’t know if I had too low of an expectation, but Madame Web was better than I thought. Doesn’t make it a good movie by any stretch, but I really enjoyed the middle section of it. The opening and ending is really terrible, though.
- Comment on Disney creates best argument for piracy in a century. 2 months ago:
The actual solution in that case is just don’t watch a Disney show. You won’t die from not watching shows.
- Comment on Linguistic Perscriptivists 2 months ago:
See, I could understand you just find despite you writing “If course”, but if you try to say to me that is not a mistake simply because I could understand you, I cannot at all agree with your logic of what makes it the language “correct”.
- Comment on Linguistics 3 months ago:
While, at the same time, don’t be mad at people that don’t understand the word you used because they lack the context. Be educational, don’t gatekeep.
- Comment on 'LLM-free' is the new '100% organic' - Creators Are Fighting AI Anxiety With an ‘LLM-Free’ Movement 5 months ago:
Only NFTs died, so I guess part of crypto did.
- Comment on Ant smell 5 months ago:
Soury pungent smell.
- Comment on Polisci 5 months ago:
Isn’t one of the point of all those telescopes we built in space and on earth to prove or disprove our hypothesis regarding astronomy? Is that not experimentation?
- Comment on Ripperonis 6 months ago:
Time moves differently during a musical number, anyway. They regularly skip forward to the next scene that can be hours or even days away.
- Comment on Did the premise of an entity approaching you only when it's not being viewed originate with Doctor Who's Weeping Angels? 6 months ago:
Neither of the links work for me. The closing parenthesis still missing on both. I’m on Sync for Lemmy.
- Comment on Why do people still eat beef when we know it's terrible for Earth? 6 months ago:
Again, sure, whatever your mind wants to make up and believe to maintain your superiority complex. It’s just really funny seeing how ass-backwards you are since your efforts seem more damaging to your movement than anything else. It’s almost like you don’t actually care about reducing beef consumption, only that you get to claim the moral high ground. Well, whatever. It’s not worth arguing with your ego, I got better things to do.
- Comment on Why do people still eat beef when we know it's terrible for Earth? 6 months ago:
In what way? He was clearly receptive to the link given by the other guy. The fact that you only see what you want to see is the real problem here.
- Comment on Why do people still eat beef when we know it's terrible for Earth? 6 months ago:
Sure, whatever you want to believe. You don’t seem to care that you’re sabotaging your own movement, anyway, so what so I care what you think.
- Comment on Why do people still eat beef when we know it's terrible for Earth? 6 months ago:
I’m pretty sure more animals got killed by you turning off people against the movement than I ever cause by eating beef my whole life. I barely eat beef in the first place, and most of what I eat comes from small scale local farmers. So congrats, I guess, for killing more cows than me.