stephen01king
@stephen01king@lemmy.zip
- Comment on DNA 1 day ago:
I guess if he wrote “That’s irony right there”, it would be easier to consider it a complete sentence, so maybe you’re right.
- Comment on DNA 1 day ago:
I meant to say that part is already a complete sentence.
- Comment on DNA 1 day ago:
Isn’t the first mistake simply him using the sentence to declare there is irony? How is that an incomplete sentence?
- Comment on Baldur's Gate 3 Is Being Review Bombed By Chinese Gamers After The Game Awards 5 days ago:
Everyone needs the /s. It’s simply text, there is no tone to judge your sarcasm by.
- Comment on skull crushers 2 weeks ago:
Maybe he’s comparing their weight distribution?
- Comment on YEET 2 weeks ago:
42.1 km/s is relative to the sun’s surface, but launching from Earth’s surface. You need to look at the value labelled V_te, which is the speed relative to the minor body the object is launching from. In this case, it is 16.6 km/s.
- Comment on YEET 2 weeks ago:
94000mph is relative to the sun’s surface. Relative to the Earth’s surface, it is around 37000mph, which means they were still wrong.
- Comment on YEET 2 weeks ago:
The escape velocity for the solar system and from Earth’s surface should not be the same. This is why you should always double check anything ChatGPT says.
- Comment on TURKEY POWER 3 weeks ago:
Yes, radiation can kill people decades later, but so does pollution from burning fossil fuel. BTW, your link talks about nuclear accidents, not the number of people killed by nuclear wastes produced normally, which is what you claimed is killing people. A bit of a misdirection on your part, isn’t it?
- Comment on TURKEY POWER 3 weeks ago:
How many people has all the waste we’ve produced kill up to now?
- Comment on I wonder why people litter in the USA? 3 weeks ago:
Only if you wanna piss off Edna.
- Comment on A re-edit of M Night Shyamalan's 'Trap' becomes a film about a frustrated dad at a Taylor Swift concert. 3 weeks ago:
I see, that makes a lot more sense now. And I agree, that movie is terrible.
- Comment on A re-edit of M Night Shyamalan's 'Trap' becomes a film about a frustrated dad at a Taylor Swift concert. 3 weeks ago:
Ok, so that’s just me, then. I remembered not liking it back then, but I can’t even remember why at this point lol.
- Comment on A re-edit of M Night Shyamalan's 'Trap' becomes a film about a frustrated dad at a Taylor Swift concert. 4 weeks ago:
Was After Earth watchable? My memory seems to recall otherwise.
- Comment on Valve has created a Steam Bluesky account 4 weeks ago:
Well, I didn’t stay because I couldn’t figure it out unlike with Lemmy and my feed is still barely showing me anything new.
- Comment on Capsaicin 1 month ago:
Because our brains are amazing and can just fill out the missing word while reading.
- Comment on Proud globohomo 1 month ago:
It just sounds sarcastic to me.
- Comment on Equinunerous Sets 2 months ago:
Does that mean you cannot distinguish between the two?
- Comment on Kitty. 2 months ago:
I’m guessing you’re right next to a cat when you made this comment.
- Comment on Eureka 2 months ago:
Probably not.
- Comment on OpenAI’s new “deep-thinking” o1 model crushes coding benchmarks. 2 months ago:
And keep repeating those words until you’re satisfied. Maybe you can finally understand why they’re meaningless.
- Comment on OpenAI’s new “deep-thinking” o1 model crushes coding benchmarks. 2 months ago:
Says the guys who started throwing the insult. It’s nice that you are kind of self aware of your own shortcomings.
- Comment on OpenAI’s new “deep-thinking” o1 model crushes coding benchmarks. 2 months ago:
Oh, you actually know what your problem is, good job.
- Comment on OpenAI’s new “deep-thinking” o1 model crushes coding benchmarks. 2 months ago:
Doesn’t sound like you understand it very much, like I thought so.
- Comment on OpenAI’s new “deep-thinking” o1 model crushes coding benchmarks. 2 months ago:
What does that even mean? Neural networks have varying levels of complexity, even within the same technology. Even the same LLM model can have different number of tokens that differentiate the complexity of their operation.
So instead of using a neural network that is designed to input and output text and making it learn to output coding, which is also text, you think it’s supposed to be easier for them to make it instead analyse various video and audio input from multiple cameras, and then output the various actions that is required for it to drive a car? Does that make sense to you?
- Comment on OpenAI’s new “deep-thinking” o1 model crushes coding benchmarks. 3 months ago:
I think you’re completely wrong by still comparing skills that have no relation to each other. What’s the similarity between driving and coding that would require an LLM to be need to do one before you can believe it can do the other? Explain that leap in logic properly before you continue with your argument.
An LLM is designed to output text. Expecting them to drive to prove their ability to output code is like expecting them to dance to prove their ability to produce poems. It’s inability to do an unrelated skill has no bearing on it’s ability to do a different one. You’re basically judging a fish on its ability to walk on land, and using that as the basis to judge its ability to swim.
- Comment on OpenAI’s new “deep-thinking” o1 model crushes coding benchmarks. 3 months ago:
Most adults can also lean to code, if they actually tried. If you’re gonna add the argument that most people can’t code proficiently, most people can’t drive proficiently, either.
Also, driving and coding are completely different set of skills that it’s kinda stupid to compare them. Some people can code just fine but might never learn how to drive because they didn’t need to, so to consider driving as a prerequisite skill to coding doesn’t make sense.
- Comment on OpenAI’s new “deep-thinking” o1 model crushes coding benchmarks. 3 months ago:
No way are you going to convince me 99% of the population can drive. Go get a more accurate statistics before trying to use it to dismiss something.
- Comment on UPDATE: Here is the final design of the Humorless Toaster, that this wonderful community helped me pick yesterday! (Needless to say one of the previous versions was unintentionally problematic) 3 months ago:
I also thought it was intentional, and hilarious, but this one is definitely an improvement.
- Comment on Jackhammer 3 months ago:
By your logic, light isn’t a useful sense to possess since it’s everywhere all the time thanks to sunlight and moonlight, is that correct?
Actually, since ultraviolet radiation and light are both electromagnetic waves, they should be treated the same, shouldn’t they? It’s as if there could be a different reason why we can detect one but not the other.