couldhavebeenyou
@couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
- Comment on Who also enjoys this? 1 week ago:
Saw a post from the fem comm stating this place is going awry
- Comment on Anon Promotes Shrimp Farming 1 week ago:
You can sell the rest to the restaurants
- Comment on That's how the world works. 1 week ago:
You should even get a little extra! You know, because of all the responsibility
- Comment on That's how the world works. 1 week ago:
They’ll have plenty of friends and family that suddenly feel an urge to come over and lend them a hand once the real shit goes down
- Comment on That's how the world works. 1 week ago:
This is how capitalism starts
- Comment on [deleted] 2 weeks ago:
I believe the UN is relevant and has power on some levels. When a few million people want to kill another few million, it depends a lot on how much the member states are willing to do.
From a certain level of conflict, they become irrelevant because they don’t hold any hard power. But I don’t see how that makes them complicit
- Comment on [deleted] 2 weeks ago:
Would you consider yourself complicit?
- Comment on 3 weeks ago:
The one from OP goes for about $70 on AliExpress
/r/Lepin
- Comment on FADED. 🥴 3 weeks ago:
Wait so he’s a patsy
But he also killed him
They just went the extra mile to change the rifle (and angle)?
- Comment on FADED. 🥴 3 weeks ago:
You know that makes me want to post
Back in 2016, there was something amazing: /r/TheDonald/
I was following that in amazement. Donnie T capitalized on the army of detached dummies (deplorables) that had been cultivated by decades of Fox News (style media). They were so detached that even mainstream republicans couldn’t get a hold - Donnie T would just go further.
And by the time the 2016 election got closer, that /r/ would just go more unhinged. All the Dems and old Reps were (satanist) pedo’s and if Donnie got elected, he’d hang them all in his first month.
Crazily, the rest of them never opposed them. They didn’t call them out on it. They just went along as if they were some kind of aligned faction.
Of course after they won there were some stragglers wondering out loud when the massive pedo roundups were going to happen, but after a while that fizzled out.
Most of them are more than happy to ally themselves with the complete loonies
- Comment on EA Lays Off Staff Across All Battlefield Studios Following Record-Breaking Battlefield 6 Launch - IGN 3 weeks ago:
It’s like the movie industry but here there’s still some consumers that pretend to care
- Comment on An old excuse 4 weeks ago:
Lets put it this way: When was the last time Iran launched a “preemptive” strike on Israel or the US?
Well, for example: Hezbollah launched attacks on Israel on oct 8th 2023 right after Hamas did their infamous attack, as a show of support. Hezbollah is a proxy organisation for Iran getting their intel, training and weapons from them.
- Comment on An old excuse 4 weeks ago:
A1: if Iran is sending members of their military to oversee weapon shipments to groups that attack Israel, or to coördinate with groups that attack Israel, don’t you see that that’s a little bit different from “we’re just peacefully sitting at home and they attack us out of nowhere” ?
A2: if you’re going to conflate this with the attack on Iraq you’ll ha
- Comment on An old excuse 4 weeks ago:
We can flip that argument
I’m happy you’re seeing the light :)
the US+Israel bombs you anyway
Well, no.
Can you give any examples of either Israel or the US bombing Iran or something like you describe that wasn’t linked to their nuclear program?
For clarity: impotent calls to attack Iran have always been there: from inside the US (remember McCain singing), from Israel (well, Iran is sponsoring the ‘freedom fighters’ in direct conflict with Israel for decades) and even from Saudi Arabia (which was also confirmed in Cablegate).
But can you give any examples of the US or even Israel directly attacking them since like the 80’s?
Claims from Bibi with a cartoon that Iran is working on nukes: no attack Strong indications that they are, indeed, working to acquire nukes: Stuxnet, assassinations, negotiations Clear proof that they are ramping up production of highly enriched uranium: negatiotions Refusal to stop their production: attack + pickachu
- Comment on An old excuse 4 weeks ago:
Well they could, and I know this is a crazy idea but bear with me for just a moment, not try to make nuclear weapons
“I need nuclear weapons to protect me from people attacking me because they want to prevent me from getting nuclear weapons” -> somewhere there’s a bit of circular logic in there
- Comment on An old excuse 4 weeks ago:
‘Their sovereignty’ in this case being a religious elite of around 5% that holds the rest of the people as their cattle.
Sure from their pov they ‘need’ those nukes, but unless you’re on their side it’s a very good thing if they don’t get them
- Comment on An old excuse 4 weeks ago:
Ah yes, the ‘everyone with nukes and a button to destroy the world’ philosophy
Sure sounds great
- Comment on [deleted] 4 weeks ago:
brand new pair of jeans or something like that I’ll separate it for a load or two
Maybe grow some cojones instead?
- Comment on An old excuse 4 weeks ago:
IAEA made it quite clear that Iran was, in fact, producing highly enriched uranium. There’s no other use for than to make nukes
Ironically, IAEA reports also supported that Iraq was not doing so back in 2003.
- Comment on Must be nice 1 month ago:
Just keeping his babies warm and safe
- Comment on Beyond fucked up 1 month ago:
Ok boomer
Sorry I can see a 20 y/o actress doing a sex scene without dreaming of Epstein ;-)
- Comment on Beyond fucked up 1 month ago:
Well if you can’t watch a movie with an actress that’s 18 or even in her twenties without automatically thinking she’s being exploited, I guess you just need to turn off the tv, stop reading books and, finally, stay off the internet.
Teens have (consensual) sex, people are going to tell stories that reflect life, young actresses (and actors) are going to play teens and twentysomethings that crave and have sex.
I get thinking a 17 y/o in an explicit sexual role is a bit risqué but if you need them to be 30+ it’s just fully ridiculous for me
- Comment on Beyond fucked up 1 month ago:
I haven’t seen the movie, only read synopsis and reviews, and it doesn’t seem at all like the actresses are sexualized. It’s a coming of age comedy. Maybe the idea about 15 year olds thinking about sex is what got your mind going at the time?
Can you explain how they were exploited?
- Comment on Beyond fucked up 1 month ago:
But then what do you find wrong with that movie? Apparently it’s about 15 year olds trying to get laid at camp. I sure was trying to get laid at camp when I was 15
- Comment on Beyond fucked up 1 month ago:
Not exactly of boomer age myself but deducting that you’re younger I think it’s pretty sad that you have this opinion…
Yeah, teenage girls are interested in sex. Even lesbian sex! Sorry. It’s sad that you think it’s ‘unhygienic’ or whatever that there’s movies about it.
A few decades later American Pie broke the box office on the same premise. Is that ok because it’s all heterosexual?
- Comment on What would you do if you knew your neighbor was an ICE/DHS agent? 2 months ago:
Olympics!
- Comment on Totally 2 months ago:
He sure took something rough
- Comment on "It is out of the question to let a boss run rampant" - Ubisoft workers strike against "disastrous" cutbacks 2 months ago:
I’m not really into betting.
How much do you want to bet that Ubisoft massively overhired personnel when they were making money hand over fist, forgetting to take into account how much money they could actually make from their IP?
These workers were fools to join or stay with Ubisoft
- Comment on "It is out of the question to let a boss run rampant" - Ubisoft workers strike against "disastrous" cutbacks 2 months ago:
Maybe they should have made some better games
- Comment on The holy journey 2 months ago:
I believe the phrase is taking an lsd