So the valid observation is this: Countries started using green energy as a supplement and replacement to fossil fuels, and as fossil fuels are being phased out for any number of good reasons, those counties also started moving away from fossil fuel collection and stockpiling. But because they weren’t yet entirely free of the need for fossil fuels yet, cutting off those fuels left them with an energy deficit.
The bad take: The move towards green energy made the western world vulnerable to an energy crisis, so we should go back to funding the fossil fuels industry as soon as possible.
The correct take: The continued reliance on fossil fuels made the western world vulnerable to an energy crisis, so we should rid ourselves of that reliance as soon as possible.
A county that runs entirely on non-fossil fuel energy, on solar, wind, tidal, geothermal, even nuclear, doesn’t have to worry if the flow of oil is open or not. Ever. Your infrastructure would have to be attacked directly (like the war crime Trump threatened) to cut you off at that point. That’s about as invulnerable as you could hope for.
TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
Brenda Shaffer, whatever she is, is clearly an idiot.
MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 19 hours ago
She got a bad case of Murdoch…
CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 17 hours ago
Lol her wikipedia article lists a history of corruption from oil companies
carrylex@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brenda_Shaffer
and there’s like 3 more cases of that…
couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 14 hours ago
Could/should be an alias