michaelmrose
@michaelmrose@lemmy.world
- Comment on Some people prefer corn for some ungodly reason 4 days ago:
Nobody says the come and go. They can come on later in life but once there you are basically stuck with it. Reason being is that allergies are an immune reaction. These are mediated by immune cells, antibodies, that bind to the $insert_bad_thing and put a “murder me” sign on its back. These cell are produced by long lived immune cells.
- Comment on "No eating for free allowed! You must only watch it rot on the beach!" 1 week ago:
Did you think they were going to gather them up and take them to the store?
- Comment on "No eating for free allowed! You must only watch it rot on the beach!" 1 week ago:
You are missing everything basically.
Normally its actually legally impossible to pursue charges against someone for picking up something you deliberately abandon. Furthermore the act of doing so would in the best case involve spending thousands to tens of thousands of the people’s money to pursue such charges. Threatening to burn the people’s money and hurt people to keep people from eating food that has been abandoned is absolutely crazy.
- Comment on "No eating for free allowed! You must only watch it rot on the beach!" 2 weeks ago:
Morally nobody is being deprived of value because the goods aren’t saleable and thus no effort will be made to collect them. They are rather insisting that others who would have enjoyed them should simply let them rot. So first you are arguing for moral evil for no purpose. Next it is normally the case that goods that are abandoned on purpose eg making no attempt to collect the bananas cannot be stolen.
Lastly such a threat is absolutely insane.because it is a threat to go after private citizens with the power of the state to punish people for what normally isn’t a crime, wasting the publics resources hurting people for doing something that was never morally wrong.
Does this still make sense to you?
- Comment on how time flows 3 weeks ago:
Tell a bad joke, people don’t get it and now whining about it
- Comment on Dude read the rules of woman only community and decided to post anyway 5 weeks ago:
Online communities don’t have to have the same demographics as physical locations. Why does it seem weird to you that either gender would want to vent about the opposite one without reading 100 replies by the group being vented about.
- Comment on Dude read the rules of woman only community and decided to post anyway 5 weeks ago:
Yes nobody could possibly downvote for any other reason
- Comment on She strongly disagrees 1 month ago:
If this is so why is it such an article of faith for most of the next 2000 years that women not be allowed to serve as religious leaders. Your reading is just ahistorical. Ignores all other verses that clearly delineate the subservience of women and reasoning for same.
- Comment on She strongly disagrees 1 month ago:
It’s pretty clear that none of the individual sects consider which texts to follow up for debate and they used to murder you for having a different opinion. It is pretty clear that any new found mental flexibility is both heretical and ahistorical
- Comment on She strongly disagrees 1 month ago:
You’ve still added god to the picture for no particular reason. The universe doesn’t need a sentient cause there is absolutely no reason to believe it needs one.
- Comment on She strongly disagrees 1 month ago:
You rarely convince christians or any other sort of fanatic you argue with them for the peanut gallery to create a pervasive sense that among smart people its a joke so that a few people should ultimately decide to laugh instead of being the butt of it.
It is on the overall working. Religious nones are a growing group and atheism is slightly more acceptable. Once nearly all were Christians. We are down to 62% of the pop and the youngest gen is 48%.
- Comment on She strongly disagrees 1 month ago:
I think its pretty clear that the word of man is not just like their opinion its the inspiration of the divine. It’s not really up for debate.
- Comment on She strongly disagrees 1 month ago:
The explanation is bubkis historical re-imagining like when the media sane washes the babble that comes out of Trump’s mouth. He’ll spend 15 minutes babbling about how he thinks magnets work and they report hurr durr somewhere in there he said lower taxes.
- Comment on She strongly disagrees 1 month ago:
No christian would possibly accept the idea of an omniscient, omnipotent and evil god. Once you start imagining from first principals what ought to be real you don’t end up with Christianity. If you restarted humanity 1000 times you would get newtons conception of gravity every single time you would get Christianity zero times.
- Comment on She strongly disagrees 1 month ago:
It’s not a bad argument technique to pull out the actual primary document and examine it. You can take small portions of a document in a fair minded fashion and examine it without deliberately being misleading or taking it out of context.
- Comment on She strongly disagrees 1 month ago:
This is… not what the bible says. The bible doesn’t suggest that the bible is the word of man and subject to interpretation or waffling. It says that women are lesser than men and should be subject to them and it says it very very clearly.
- Comment on PC Master Race 1 month ago:
I think the point is that you don’t have to pay ANYTHING per month to play apps or games you already fully paid for online whereas not paying for playstation online means you lose that entire aspect of your own device whereas with a ps5 if you stop paying sony you can no longer even use netflix despite paying netflix your isp and sony for their hardware. They use the fact that they control your device to effectively blackmail you by making third party apps contingent on paying their blackmail.
- Comment on She is making a GREAT point 1 month ago:
So in this imaginary never ending orgy it would still make sense for the women to take the pill because if 99% of the men do the other 1% will somehow make every single women pregnant.
- Comment on PC Master Race 1 month ago:
Would you like a meme with 8 or less characters and a 2nd grade reading level to calm you down?
- Comment on PC Master Race 1 month ago:
I don’t think its a non-argument. If we are talking about PC gaming as a budget option the fact that you CAN have JUST a singular device isn’t obviated by the fact that some people have a separate general purpose PC any more than it is because some people still a $5000 GPU on a $15000 device.
- Comment on PC Master Race 1 month ago:
Most recently I got a nice radeon 6600 with 8GB VRAM for 100 I guess.
- Comment on PC Master Race 1 month ago:
Using a TV for general computing would be fairly broken due to font rendering and DPI. Comparing used anything is fraught because its filled with caveats and isn’t repeatable.
- Comment on PC Master Race 1 month ago:
I didn’t say they didn’t watch netflix or have internet.
PC gamers don’t pay a monthly fee connected to their gaming.
- Comment on PC Master Race 1 month ago:
350€ = 405 USD once you add in a mouse keyboard and monitor you are over 500 the figure I used. Decrease your figures further and it gets shittier fast.
- Comment on PC Master Race 1 month ago:
Only a tiny minority of PC gamers pay monthly for anything.
You can’t upgrade the PS5, and the sale price of your 5-year-old unit is like $100.
Free games aren’t included in the 10 per month.
The cost of 18 per month to also have old games costs 1300 over 6 years.
The PC you can get for $200 will be awful to use or die within 3 years or both. It will be ridiculous to repair, so you will buy another 200 special hating the shit you bought both times.
Basically at the root a PC and a console are both good for about 6 years but the 700-1300 you pay for online is going to dwarf the buy up from acceptable PC to gaming PC+ hardware.
Cheap PC are the value option expensive pc are the quality option.
Consoles are kind of in between.
- Comment on PC Master Race 1 month ago:
Let’s compare a 6 year price without games.
PC gaming
800 gaming PC 200 mid cycle update to GPU 3-5 years in
PS5
500 non-gaming PC because your ps5 isn’t a useful alternative 500 ps5 650 ps5 pro 4 years in 720 for PlayStation online basic at 10 per month
1000 vs 2370
Laughing at console gamers spending more than the cost of a basic computer on the privilege of using it online via your own internet which you also pay for
- Comment on PC Master Race 1 month ago:
Software and driver issues like clicking update? Waiting for a reboot?
The same one year warranty that your PC has?
- Comment on PC Master Race 1 month ago:
That isn’t something normal people buy you can spend any amount on anything but its really fringe rich people shit.
- Comment on PC Master Race 1 month ago:
Yep so many amazing games for $5-20 on steam sales often not even that old
- Comment on soda 2 months ago:
No. The loss from ridiculous misuse is small but meaningful and basically worth nothing because typically “exposure” isn’t worth anything whatsoever. Worse it might convince some other assholes with the same strategy to specifically target your joint magnifying their loss.
It’s funny that you who have run nothing know better than every company.