artfully stylized graphics will always be better because they will look timeless
Stop stressing my GPU and start hiring artists
Submitted 3 hours ago by ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world to [deleted]
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/4d7ed2cc-f99e-4384-901b-544e03a29c62.jpeg
Comments
big_slap@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
saigot@lemmy.ca 2 hours ago
These aren’t mutually exclusive
mad_lentil@lemmy.ca 2 hours ago
High-fidelity and artfully stylized aren’t, but photorealism is like… a photo.
CubitOom@infosec.pub 1 hour ago
Photo realism still requires art direction.
Think of a movie.
PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 hour ago
I think they mean that you can like both, you don’t have to choose only one to like
PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 hour ago
I like both, they each have their place
Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 hour ago
Hand draw each frame. Now do it 60 or more times per second.
Raglesnarf@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
you know what, I’ll just keep playing the same old decade old games I’ve been playing
FishFace@piefed.social 2 hours ago
Meh, I like high fidelity graphics. Most “artfully stylised” games are not to my taste either - pixel graphics do nothing for me and nor do a lot of flat 2D graphics. Stuff like GRIS is beautiful, but it seems to be an outlier. So for visually engaging stuff I find it’s AAA mostly realistic graphics - if not “photorealistic” - for me.
db2@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
Why do that when I can just ask Sora to make it for me? Then I don’t have to engage my brain at all!
Grostleton@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 hours ago
Darktide: Porque no los dos?
Glide@lemmy.ca 1 minute ago
Monster Hunter Rise was more visually satisfying that Wilds. Prove me wrong (you can’t).