PeriodicallyPedantic
@PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
- Comment on Simpler times? 2 days ago:
You mean the other reply you gave me where you either misquoted it or you misunderstood the study? And you artificially limited the scope to a single kind of hurt which wouldn’t even capture the kind of hurt we’re discussing here?
Actually I tried to find the study that you’re talking about and I can’t find it. Did he actually do a study on this? Afaict he is just a self-help author. I cant even find any formal education related to the subject.Meanwhile if you do a quick search for if unresolved trauma leads to violence, you see a ton of research supporting that.
- Comment on Simpler times? 2 days ago:
50/50 is a HUGE correlation.
Incidence of DV is way less than 50/50 in the general population.Besides, it’s not just DV or SA, it’s also smaller things. You can hurt people without rising to the level of assault.
- Comment on Red, gold and green. 2 days ago:
He cums in Gauss. He cums in Gauss
- Comment on Simpler times? 2 days ago:
But this situation doesn’t 😏
- Comment on Simpler times? 2 days ago:
Hey, we’ve got an edgelord over here. Hey everyone, look at the edgelord! He’s edging!
- Comment on Simpler times? 2 days ago:
I figured, I was being silly 😛
- Comment on Simpler times? 3 days ago:
If you lived through 2006 then you’re too old to enjoy having a couple of highschool goths fawn over you 😏
- Comment on Simpler times? 3 days ago:
“Hurt people hurt people” is a common saying for a reason; dealing with trauma is difficult and not dealing with it often leads to problems.
That’s not to say that victims always become victimizers, it’s to say that the cycle of violence often begins with violence. - Comment on Simpler times? 3 days ago:
Because girls have cooties. Didn’t you know this???
- Comment on We need a Thomas the Tank Engine horror game 1 week ago:
To be fair, it was made by a single dude. Not even a small indie studio, just one guy.
It doesn’t make it more fun, but it makes it more impressive and deserving of slack.
- Comment on Here's a fun game. 1 week ago:
Ah yes, dick dick, my favorite movie
- Comment on Animal guessing game!!! 1 week ago:
Banana
- Comment on 1 week ago:
- Comment on A question for the ages 1 week ago:
As much as I want it to run tall wise, there is clear evolutionary pressure to run longwise so the dog doesn’t fall out of the bun.
There is no way the hotdog could evolve sanding upright - Comment on OK what is your Roman name? 1 week ago:
Grapius
- Comment on Ibuprofen 2 weeks ago:
◴~◠~◷
- Comment on Ibuprofen 2 weeks ago:
Is that going clockwise or counterclockwise?
- Comment on Need a keyboard with a dedicated "slop" button 2 weeks ago:
I struggle to believe that someone who writes English as well as you, and is familiar with the subject can misread what I’ve written so grossly, except by intention.
using someone’s preferred pronouns doesn’t harm anyone.
This post is about being made to use someone’s preferred pronouns. The context of this whole discussion is the usage of preferred pronouns. The pronouns being discussed are preferred pronouns. The harm being discussed is harm (or lack thereof) in using them.
- Comment on Dinner is ready! 2 weeks ago:
RIP to the Mediterranean
Or alternatively, everyone gets a little bit of Mediterranean food
- Comment on It's only funny when I do it 3 weeks ago:
I don’t think that that equivalence matters here, or that they don’t care that they’re being hypocritical.
We can still enjoy a meme about how they are hypocrites and how their stated beliefs crumble under the smallest pressure.
- Comment on proportional reaction 3 weeks ago:
Switch is good if you only need to compare equals when selecting a value.
Although some languages make it way more powerful, like pythonmatch
.
but I generally dislike python despite of this, and I generally dislikeswitch
because the syntax and formatting is just too unlike the rest of the languages.Generally I prefer the clear brevity of:
var foo= x>100 ? bar : x>50 ? baz : x>10 ? qux : quxx;
Over
var foo; if(x>100) { foo=bar; } else if(x>50) { foo=baz; } else if(x>10) { foo=qux; } else { foo=quxx }
Which doesn’t really get any better if you remove the optional (but recommended) braces.
Heck, I even prefer ternary over some variations ofswitch
for equals conditionals, like the one in Java:var foo; switch(x) { case 100: foo=bar; break; case 50: foo=baz; break; case 10: foo=qux; break; default: foo=quxx; }
But some languages do
switch
better than others (like python as previously mentioned), so there are certainly cases where that’d probably be preferable even to me. - Comment on proportional reaction 3 weeks ago:
Hey, when you gotta pick a value from a bunch of options, it’s either if/elseif/else, ternary, switch/case, or a map/dict.
Ternary generally has the easiest to read format of the options, unless you put it all on one line like a crazy person.
- Comment on proportional reaction 3 weeks ago:
Bah
Ternary is just a compressed if-elseif-else chain with a guaranteed assignment.
If you format it like a sane person, or like you would an if/else chain, then it’s way easier to read than if/else chains. - Comment on A conundrum 4 weeks ago:
Oh no, their own process that they made for being given a house is so expensive, I feel so bad for them!
Why are you defending them so hard? You just have to look at their quarterly financials. They’re making out like gangbusters.
- Comment on A conundrum 4 weeks ago:
But if you don’t pay, they get the house. There is no risk of loss, only risk of not maximizing profit.
- Comment on A conundrum 4 weeks ago:
That’s the impression I get too
But it’s plausibly deniable enough because you can still get decent credit score if you pay off your credit before you pay interest. It’s a numbers game for them, I expect, but still.
- Comment on A conundrum 4 weeks ago:
you need to pay us interest because we’re taking the risk. Also you need to give us a down payment to offset our risk.
- Comment on A conundrum 4 weeks ago:
you’re not gonna be able to afford this apartment after a few years of 10% rent increases, and we don’t want the inconvenience of evicting you when that time comes
- Comment on A conundrum 4 weeks ago:
The first time I applied for a loan, I didn’t have a credit card yet. And they were like:
How can we know you’re responsible with money?
Because I haven’t needed credit in the past and I’m still alive, idk? Having enough liquidity to not need credit would seem to suggest I’m good with money.
But maybe your parents are paying for everything
Ok? How does using a credit card change that?
- Comment on PSA 4 weeks ago:
Lest I checked, this was a free country