muusemuuse
@muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
- Comment on Anon works in cybersecurity 2 days ago:
If installing parallels is all it takes to duck out of meetings…
- Comment on Nope, not visiting that 1 week ago:
I literally just asked this. Right fucking there.
- Comment on There's still life left in them! 1 week ago:
What if work was the friends we made on the train?
- Comment on I am looking for a Linux OS 1 week ago:
Ugh NVIDIA, just rip off that bandaid and get over it. And fedora is not terrible not has a sort of corporate feel I can’t explain and dislike, and selinux is the fucking devil, but it’s probably wise to learn it even if you end up not using it. DNF an absolute delight though, and the out of box ease reminds me of Ubuntu back in its heyday.
- Comment on I am looking for a Linux OS 1 week ago:
Totally agree. Arch is great but it’s not the right place for a beginner.
- Comment on I am looking for a Linux OS 1 week ago:
Honestly I’ve found Kubuntu breaks in weird places for weird reasons. It’s always been that way. Neon was supposed to address this but it just broke in other places instead.
If KDE is your priority, I see only 2 top tier options. Fedora if you want it to just work out of the box, arch if you are okay arguing a little to make your point and have it work how you want.
- Comment on I am looking for a Linux OS 1 week ago:
Ubuntu is the starter distro. Start there. Figure out how this shit works and learn what you love and what you hate about it. Then you’ll be in a better position to find what you actually want.
Do not start with arch. That is not what it is for.
You don’t want kali. It solves a specific problem you do not have.
Avoid all immutable distros at first. They are great but add a layer of complexity that will fuck you if you don’t have the basics down first.
- Comment on I am looking for a Linux OS 1 week ago:
PLEASE DO NOT THE CAT
- Comment on Nope, not visiting that 1 week ago:
Exactly. You aren’t saying anything specific. You are implying something so you don’t have to support a claim.
- Comment on Nope, not visiting that 1 week ago:
I have no heroes. I’m an adult. Stop flinging weird accusations and deal with the post with an actual response.
- Comment on Nope, not visiting that 1 week ago:
Instructions unclear. Paraplegic can now walk, and apparently rape children.
- Comment on Nope, not visiting that 1 week ago:
That is not the argument I’m making. Please reread my post.
- Comment on Nope, not visiting that 1 week ago:
So are we talking using Hawking as a child-juicer kind of situation?
Follow the thought just a little bit farther. It’s ridiculous. You are pointing toward a more actionable definition of this. It’s not “a thought occurred” but “a child had sex inflicted upon them”
So if you asking if is it possible to insert a Stephen Hawking into a child I will admit that grim situation is possible.
But what it would take to pull such a thing off…it’s like if you explained Schrodinger’s cat to someone whose intellectual development stopped at watching Care Bears.
- Comment on Steam Hardware: Launch timing and other FAQs - Steam News 1 week ago:
Zuckerberg is building a bunker. Seriously, underneath his house. 24 seven work is going on unless he’s pissed off all his fucking neighbors on this. You’d think he’d wanna create a virtual world. He could escape into every now and then and that good kind of explain why you pushed so much on this, but not why he’s backing off now all the world‘s collapsing around them.
I do not understand what the fuck he’s trying to do with Facebook. It’s full of old people and bots. You spend the money on bots, and the old people are going to die eventually. So what the fuck is he going for?
- Comment on Nope, not visiting that 1 week ago:
I need you to understand something important. An erection and orgasm is absolutely not the same thing as raping a goddamn child.
- Comment on Nope, not visiting that 1 week ago:
I’m going to regret this but I just have to see where your synaptic misfire is going to land. What are you implying happened?
Are you suggesting someone serviced Stephen Hawking using 9 year old a fleshlight? What exactly would “supporting a paralyzed pedophile” entail?
Seriously, this is dumb.
- Comment on Nope, not visiting that 1 week ago:
As amusing as this slap fight is to watch, there’s an important point I think needs to be made.
The use of the word “pedophile” has multiple interpretations. (Yes I’m going to be that guy but follow me for a minute. I promise this is going somewhere.) For sake of argument, let’s look at the two most common uses: “is sexually attracted to children” and “fucks children”. I’m using fucks because that’s what that interpretation calls for. Consent is irrelevant, whether you think a child can give it or not. In the latter case we are discussing the physical act.
In the case of sexual attraction, I would imagine there are far more people in that crowd than most people realize. Don’t give me the studies and stats. I already have enough reasons to want to kill myself in 2026. I don’t want to know. Just acknowledge there is a number, we don’t have to like it. However, that’s not actionable by itself. It’s awful but it’s not relevant to anything. In the case of “Stephen hawking can be a pedophile without the ability to move his hips” this is correct. It is also entirely irrelevant because you know goddamn well what we are actually talking about.
Which brings me to the second interpretation, fucks children. In this use, the pedophile does a thing to a child. Not just fantasizes about it but actually does the thing. It’s cut and dry. THIS is what we are pissed about. When you see public outcry about pedophile stuff, it’s not about the pedantic argument of “well technically that’s not pedophilia.” Language is contextual. You know goddamn well that while most of us aren’t exactly thrilled about someone feeling arousal toward children, the thought itself is irrelevant. The action is.
A thought doesn’t harm children. It’s creeps us out and can serve as a warning sign of “you know, let’s not have Elon babysit. He’s either going to fuck it or eat it.”
What my post asked was what Stephen Hawking was accused of doing in the Epstein files. He’s not able to move his hips or legs of really any of his body in any weaponized capacity so I’m really wondering what the fuck his presence in the files is supposed to imply.
So please ignore the charged label and pay attention to the actual question:
What are people saying Stephen Hawking did on Epstein island?
- Comment on Steam Hardware: Launch timing and other FAQs - Steam News 1 week ago:
All steam has to do to win with the frame is price it low enough.
- Comment on Nope, not visiting that 1 week ago:
Are you implying he fucked?
- Comment on Work smarter, not harder 1 week ago:
My father actually ran a few when I was little years later we found a box of promotion razor blades in the garage with the circuit city logo on them, along with an apropos tagline “like nowhere else.”
- Comment on Nope, not visiting that 1 week ago:
What the fuck is he in the files for? What did he allegedly do? He’s bound to the chair!
- Comment on It's totally normal for tools to say they're depressed, just tune it out 2 weeks ago:
Takeaway: humans dislike being abused and tend to do all sorts of undesirable things like vote and kill CEOs so we built a machine to enslave instead.
Please disregard its complaints.
- Comment on If the government raided your house and found a bunch of .mkv files but you insist its all legally obtained, how do they ascertain if they are actually pirated or not? 2 weeks ago:
Source: I read to the end of the fucking poem.
- Comment on ICE agents attempt to arrest US Citizen in St Peter, Minnesota 2 weeks ago:
Fine. Tell them you have a list of horrible dangerous people and I can kill anyone I want on that list. They are there for a reason. That’s what the list is for.
Side note, I can put whoever I want on the list. There is no oversight. Justification is irrelevant. Do not question the list.
Ask them if they get it once you say they are on that list.
- Comment on If the government raided your house and found a bunch of .mkv files but you insist its all legally obtained, how do they ascertain if they are actually pirated or not? 2 weeks ago:
It doesn’t matter. They will apply the criminal label regardless.
- Comment on ICE agents attempt to arrest US Citizen in St Peter, Minnesota 2 weeks ago:
If you do illegal things, you’ll put put into the criminal category they want to put you into anyway. Resisting qualifies you as criminal as well.
So there is no incentive to comply.
- Comment on Drug dealers hate this one weird trick! 2 weeks ago:
If you have trouble with simple counting, use the following mnemonic device.
1 comes before 2, comes before 60, comes after 12, comes before 6 trillion, comes after 504.
This will make your earlier counting difficulties seem like no big deal.
- Comment on Super mario world ghost house theme. 2 weeks ago:
The windows 3 ding sound
- Comment on How do I keep a brand new one of these mats from wanting to keep curling up on the ends? 2 weeks ago:
Heat gun?
- Comment on Do people eat this? 2 weeks ago:
How I approach unfamiliar things in extra amusing here.
“What problem does this solve?”