🙏🙏
(idk if this is real)
Destroying aircraft seems like a very ecofriendly thing to do, same as killing humans
Submitted 1 day ago by io@piefed.blahaj.zone to [deleted]
https://piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone/posts/Kl/7s/Kl7sVHSk1dLmbvD.png
🙏🙏
(idk if this is real)
Destroying aircraft seems like a very ecofriendly thing to do, same as killing humans
Humans are also the environment 🙄
Nah, they kill way too slowly for that.
Oh cool ecofascism
There won’t be any kind of fascism left once the last human is checked off.
But who is going to clean up the trash from the wreckage?
Aircraft shot down over shallow waters can even turn into coral reefs! Wow!
And just think about all the thankful sea critters feasting on the bodies!
What? The green revolution doesn’t deserve anti-aircraft capabily?
You’re not going to beat the mosquito or rotavirus when it comes to environmentally friendly killers. Lethality, prodigious. Carbon footprint, minimal (small amount of flatulence, don’t worry about it). This comment was sponsored by Gnawed VPN.
make a better future for the children of the world by blowing up half of it
This reminds me of Jeremy Kauffman’s ad, “War is Gay,” which advocated for making militarism as gay as possible. The point is that militarism, or zabernism, is considered acceptable and even encouraged as long as DEI quotas are met within the military. youtu.be/kdfym6LKpQ0
I would argue against having military, but that’d be pointless. If we’re going to have it, it should be as representative of the population as possible. It might save the lives of underrepresented citizens when we’re invading.
So you actually believe a military should have quotas based on arbitrary characteristics such as race or gender, tied to the population it is meant to protect? That is, if the population is around 50% women, the military should attempt to have 50% women in all positions? And that any disparate outcome would be evidence of racism or sexism? Would that be your position taken to its extreme, while your actual position has the same essence but is much more sensible in degree? Or what do you think?
Killing is good way to reduce your CO2 footprint
Bombs are not environmentally friendly.
Bombs from Raytheon are environmentally friendly. Making war environmentally friendly is what Raytheon is all about. Raytheon a green company! 👍🏽
Average person’s carbon footprint is 7 tons CO2 per year. Killing just one person will make a bomb environmentally friendly.
But what if we made them so? 🤔
!NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.works
!NonCredibleDefense@piefed.social
Frutiger Anti-Aero
Carbon neutralized
Maybe the next iteration can have some seeds mixed in the payload to sprout little trees and plants over the wreckage.
I heard they’re coming out with a new one that does have seeds but they’re all non-natives selected for maximum ecological impact.
Greenwashing final boss?
Nothing will ever top “clean coal”.
Excuse me??
Competition for Veridian Dynamics
Veridian Dynamics. We can. But we won’t. Yet.
this should be in not the onion if real
NonCredibleDefense is leaking again...
Looks mostly grey to me
Thank the gods for that!
Is this fucking real?
what a time to be alive indeed. crazy shit.
Yes, but is it using recycled plastics?
*recycled plastic explosives
boonhet@sopuli.xyz 20 hours ago
It’s satire. Original tweet was about an environmentally friendly radar system from Raytheon
The fact that so many people actually fell for it is worrying not just because reality itself has become satire but because this post should be painfully obvious. Ain’t nobody marketing missiles to anyone who cares about the carbon footprint.
FatVegan@leminal.space 13 hours ago
A lot of things are pretty normal today that would’ve been satire 10 years ago
drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 20 hours ago
Not going to lie. I believed it and thought ‘wow between this and the knife missile that greatly reduces civilian casualties Rathiyon are probably most morally upstanding war profiteirs of our era’
now I am just disappointed
boonhet@sopuli.xyz 20 hours ago
The knife missile was actually kinda awesome in its own way tbh. Ridiculous precision for super long distance murder with as few casualties as possible.
It’s also frightening that it exists.
DylanMc6@lemmy.ml 14 hours ago
“environmentally friendly radar system”
so weather radar?
rumba@lemmy.zip 11 hours ago
probably non-cancerous cooling sytsem or some shit like that, maybe lower RF emissions
PearOfJudes@lemmy.ml 20 hours ago
I just thought it was funny I didn’t think it was real.