Why learn when you can do what I do and look it up every single time you want to do something as though you are but a goldfish who learned to type?
me btw
Submitted 23 hours ago by not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to [deleted]
https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/20c56c5b-7ace-4781-aac6-ad3336d742ea.webp
Comments
Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 hours ago
lauha@lemmy.world 21 hours ago
Humans are fish who learned to type. And on average pretty golden
cybervseas@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 hours ago
I fucking love the default video. Classic.
blorgnis@piefed.social 22 hours ago
the video it pulled for cross-fade was fun too
DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml 15 hours ago
i have never seen this tool before and now i am forever in your debt
cybervseas@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
Nah you’re not. We’re Lemmy. Just pay it forward 😘
tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 20 hours ago
I find it wild there are countless “convert videos online for free!” sites on the Internet full of bonus malware which are all just thin wrappers around ffmpeg. And yet they persist because people want googleable answers to their problem which don’t need a command line or downloading anything.
Personally I’ve got a Python script which provides a slightly friendlier wrapper around ffmpeg for my common use-cases.
But honestly ffmpeg is such a beast, so much of what we use daily depends on it under the hood.
Limerance@piefed.social 16 hours ago
There are many nice and FOSS GUIs for the tasks ffmpeg is usually used for.
Handbrake is a great example for macOS, windows, Linux.
For more advanced video compression Shutter Encoder is fantastic.
Good old AVIDemux has a few other cool features as well, like cutting without reencoding.
There are also a bunch of straight up ffmpeg front ends as well.
Why do people use those shitty websites?
They show up as a fast and easy option without having to research, download, install, and learn to use a more complicated application.
tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 12 hours ago
For sure yeah.
I still end up having to use ffmpeg directly (in combination with other CLI tools) because there’s always something the GUIs haven’t caught up with yet. Most recently for me it was converting animated webp’s into something I could actually work with
ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 16 hours ago
Yes! The picture is inaccurate, people who need to learn ffmpeg rarely know they do.
SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 hours ago
More like ffmpreg amirite?
FooBarrington@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
Is that the fork that converts regexes into mp4?
answersplease77@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
i cannot fix her. I’d let her read the wiki or just install canvas
Passerby6497@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
Why learn ffmpeg when you can find the holy words that invokes the machine spirits transmutation codex and write them on your data slate to be used again later?
felixwhynot@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
Why do you need to learn ffmpeg
VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 22 hours ago
Wanting to do anything with video for one
wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
Not true. You can:
- create
- delete
- copy
- move
- spend an afternoon with windows movie maker
- think you are creating but forgot to reinstall the sd card
- upload youtube without any editing like a boss
So many things you can do
starchylemming@lemmy.world 20 hours ago
don’t let your dreams be dreams
create that ffm pegging video
CubitOom@infosec.pub 22 hours ago
man
damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
It’s very simple.
ffmpeg -i input_file <deep-dark-magic-you-should-be-afraid-of> output_fileCouldn’t be simpler.
Laser@feddit.org 22 hours ago
-filter_complexsends its regardsjlow@discuss.tchncs.de 7 hours ago
That you don’t need to prepend output-file with -o but need(?) to do it with the input / -i weirds me out every time I use ffmpeg (which is a lot).
damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 5 hours ago
No but that’s understandable- you can have any number of inputs (what’s the upper limit, I wonder) but everything goes into only one output…