VibeSurgeon
@VibeSurgeon@piefed.social
- Comment on It's literally science 1 day ago:
While all of these things would obviously be great, you still need to do the exercise.
- Comment on Fr🤮nch 3 days ago:
Truly depraved. A crime against humanity
- Comment on me btw 3 days ago:
I guess I should clarify that I’m talking from a video engineering perspective.
- Comment on me btw 3 days ago:
Wanting to do anything with video for one
- Comment on So... which one do I choose? 5 days ago:
All of the above
- Comment on EA invents new microtransaction nightmare as it breaks paywall promise on Skate: rent a playable area for 24 hours or buy a premium pass, bucko 1 week ago:
What’s Andrew Rousso doing in the image? Seems completely unrelated to the content of the article.
- Comment on Would you reboot the router for a Scooby Snack? 1 week ago:
I’m gonna choose to take that as an insult to all Scandinavians
- Comment on The green lean mean killing machine 1 week ago:
NANI
- Comment on Guinness wasn't proud of this one. 1 week ago:
The arch-gooner
- Comment on macOS 26.4 will notify users of Rosetta 2 discontinuation - 9to5Mac 1 week ago:
Be that as it may, businesses will generally move towards things that cost less dollars on balance
- Comment on I wish I could do executive orders 🤔 1 week ago:
I assume most of them will have no citizenship in a second country for them to be accepted in.
A pragmatic solution would be to deport them out to sea.
- Comment on macOS 26.4 will notify users of Rosetta 2 discontinuation - 9to5Mac 1 week ago:
There’s likely a maintenance cost continuously being paid that Apple wants to get away from.
- Comment on What's stopping youtube from just going full authoritarian and mandate DRM for all their videos in attempt to prevent people from downloading it or block ads? 1 week ago:
Well, you’d lose support for devices which can’t handle software DRM playback, old YouTube clients installed on things like TVs which no longer get updated, if you want to support things that only get Widevine L3 support (most devices) you’re not really going to move the needle since Widevine L3 had been broken since like forever, etc.
The main thing YouTube would gain in practice from such a move would be to get DMCA as a legal tool to crack down on people ripping YouTube videos, but that’d require some very significant resources invested into driving Legal processes against average consumers ripping videos, and the return on investment for that is almost certainly abysmal.
- Comment on 2 weeks ago:
They come with a red button, and you’re allowed to press it. You can’t be forced into a call, you have to provide consent
- Comment on 2 weeks ago:
Why are people afraid of phone calls? I literally don’t get it
- Comment on Nigel Farage's claim he 'can't be bought' is ridiculed 2 weeks ago:
You can quite literally buy him on Cameo, is this a joke or something
- Comment on What should I NOT do in front of rich people? 2 weeks ago:
When you’re sufficiently rich, you don’t even have to care about what the regular rich people think.
You can probably adopt the habit even before you manage to reach that level of wealth
- Comment on Coventry's light rail technology a 'game-changer' 3 weeks ago:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coventry_Very_Light_Rail
This has a certain gadgetbahn-smell over it and I remain skeptical.
Ditching catenaries for batteries make the vehicles heavier, requires them to be out of service for a part of the day to recharge and increases capex per vehicle instead of taking the capex on catenaries.
The claims of autonomous driving seem dubious - this usually warrants a level of separation that’s rarely afforded to trams. It’s possible, but it for sure requires not cheaping out on the infrastructure.
Ditching timetables in favour of some kind of demand-driven dispatch reduces the predictability of the network, and also seems unnecessary if the claims of autonomous driving are actually true. Maybe they have to cheap out on the amount of vehicles when making each vehicle more expensive with the batteries.
Who knows, maybe the numbers work out better than what we can see here, but until then, I remain skeptical. I hope to be proven wrong.
- Comment on Man posts his incorrect opinion online 3 weeks ago:
You might want to get that checked out.
- Comment on Drug dealers hate this one weird trick! 4 weeks ago:
Queue the chubbyemu intro music
- Comment on Bri'ish Cuisine 4 weeks ago:
Must be ragebait, right?
- Comment on They removed the like button. What next, they gonna remove videos? It’s just gonna be ads??? 1 month ago:
Wind and solar just aren’t enough.
Wind + solar + storage is both enough and beating nuclear at this point, and by the time the next nuclear power plant actually manages to get online, the calculation will be even further in favour of that mix, on account of the absolutely plummeting cost of storage, which is following the same trend as solar used to, with costs reductions >98%. Not to mention the built-in resilience you get from having a more widely distributed instead of having a few nodes producing the lion’s share of your power.
I don’t have any ideological opposition to nuclear. If you manage to build it without massive subsidies and taking care of your waste, feel free to build them. That’s happening in exactly 0 places worldwide though.
- Comment on Drag 1 month ago:
Imagine not having an aerodynamic house. 0/10