This has been shining in my eyes for the last 10 minutes whilst the bus driver takes a break.
To whomever invented LED bus advertisements: I despise you.
Submitted 5 days ago by ThePyroPython@lemmy.world to mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/6073c55b-7f59-47c1-86cf-d54c6b7ac76e.jpeg
Comments
RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world 5 days ago
over_clox@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Love your username 👍
RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Thankyou so much :) <3
reddig33@lemmy.world 5 days ago
I’m surprised that’s legal. You’d think it would distract other drivers
desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 days ago
freedom of expression does also matter, how much more distracting is this compared to if it was made with retroreflectors? Could these lights be confused for hazards? Is this any different than having a glowing “taxi” sign on a taxi?
militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Eat a dick
umbrella@lemmy.ml 5 days ago
to whomever invented
LEDadvertisements.fuck being bombarded with literal propaganda all day.
I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world 5 days ago
I think such things are banned in Australia. Clearly not safe for traffic.
JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Which is strange since we have full size electronic billboards (in WA). I don’t believe they can have scrolling text/animations etcs, but they will change once or twice in the time you can see them at fwy speeds.
They are super repulsive to me because they are more vibrant and attention demanding than traditional printed billboards (especially in low light conditions) and feel like late 90’s pop-up ads.Also i dont need a ~25m² screen changing in my peripheral vision when im already busy keeping to keep an eye on some dickhead in a lifted ford raptor or Yank Tank who is cutting through traffic.
I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Yeah it’s ok on a static object by law, but not on a moving vehicle.
And yes, even here in Armidale we have about four of them, and they don’t seem to have night dimming so can be a bit blinding.
MintyFresh@lemmy.world 4 days ago
We for real need to start legislating and enforcing brightness laws. These headlights are out of control.
There is no rhyme or reason for anything beyond a reasonable street lamp and headlight. We kept asking could we, it’s time to ask should we? If nothing else I miss seeing stars at night
cynar@lemmy.world 4 days ago
The issue with a lot of LED lights isn’t brightness, its beam dip. The light should be angled downwards so it never shines into the oncoming traffic.
Unfortunately, a lot of retrofitted brighter bulbs don’t play nicely with the beam dips. Car companies also err towards helping their diver, rather than the oncoming ones.
EddoWagt@feddit.nl 4 days ago
The brightness is absolutely a problem, it doesn’t matter how well they are adjusted, when the car hits a bump or comes over a crest, it’s going to blind oncoming traffic
phoenixz@lemmy.ca 4 days ago
In Mexico they have 10 x 30 meter (say, 30 by 100 foot) led billboards that you can literally see 10 kilometers away.
Fuck. Everything. About. That.
Those should just “accidentally” get painted
JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 days ago
Ffs of all the colors they could have used too.
ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 5 days ago
They do need to be that bright at daytime, and most indeed use automatic brightness by default. If only there was a technology that could use daylight instead of fighting it…
9point6@lemmy.world 5 days ago
I mean, I don’t think an advert needs to be illuminated at all, frankly
Know_not_Scotty_does@lemmy.world 5 days ago
They also don’t need to be visible, or exist at all for that matter. I despise ads.
ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 4 days ago
This is in general for LED text signs. The “inventors” OP mentioned probably didn’t specify a purpose, they just wanted a more reliable alternative to mechanical or manual signage but yes, most are for ads.
desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 days ago
cons: significantly more expensive, don’t work in total darkness, don’t catch attention
ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 4 days ago
They have an LED each in the top-right corner of the corresponding dot. The LEDs use different driving signals (much higher frequency and not just when the display changes) but are kept in sync with the slow-updating display to allow both technologies to complement each other: they do work in total darkness and faulty dots have LEDs as a fallback; the LEDs are half-brightness at night, full brightness at dusk and off in daylight.
Also, they were significantly LESS expensive than a sufficiently luminous LED display in the 90s before superbright LEDs existed.
As I said in another comment, they weren’t designed for ads but info signage, so they don’t actively catch attention, which is what you want to get a visually cleaner environment.
cynar@lemmy.world 4 days ago
It looks like a UK bus. If you want to help make the bus company’s life miserable there is a useful trick. This is the sort of thing a lot of parish council members will get disproportionately angry about. They also tend to have far less to do than higher bits of government. They also know a lot more about the inner workings of local government, and who’s ear to burn about it. A politely written letter (or a few from several people) can get them up in arms about it.
Once you set that in motion, wait a week or 2, then also contact the local papers about it. I’ve seen them roll with far smaller stories than this.
Neither group has much/any hard power, but the soft power of the NIMBY croud can be extremely effective against public facing companies.
subiacOSB@lemmy.ml 4 days ago
Shit that’s bright af.
BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip 5 days ago
FYI, your post title should use “whoever”, not “whomever”.
A good trick to tell whether to use “who” or “whom” is to replace “whom” with “him” or “who” with “he”. It’ll be immediately obvious (to a native English speaker) which is correct.
Whomever invented LED bus advertisements becomes Him invented LED bus advertisements
Vs
Whoever invented some stupid shit becomes He invented some stupid shit
LeftRedditOnJul1@lemmy.world 4 days ago
It says “to”. To whom.
BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip 4 days ago
Yes, that’s normally a good rule to follow, since “whom” is for a sentence’s object, but this is a special case. The clause in question is either a salutation that has no subject or object, and so either “whoever” or “whomever” is correct, or it’s a subject clause (a noun phrase, really) with an unnecessary, stylized “to” for the sake of comedic impact, in which case “whoever” would be correct.
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Clearly someone needed a technical education as a child.
IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 days ago
I read
“Technical Education Opens Doors
OR
Your Child”
I though it was a threat to either go to college, or satan takes your child as a sacrifice for being ignorant.
SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Same goes for LED headlights. “Enjoy looking directly into lasers at night.”
boonhet@lemm.ee 4 days ago
Multi-beam and Matrix LED headlights will cut oncoming traffic out of their beams. They’ll blind you less than any other type of headlight. You can see it best when driving in fog
It’s mis-aligned headlights that cause the most problems. And people retrofitting HIDs or LEDs into enclosures that are not meant for those.
TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 4 days ago
road advertisement in general should be illegal, it’s literally MADE to distract drivers
Blackmist@feddit.uk 4 days ago
I’m sure I’ve seen them with the side panel showing the route the bus was travelling on.
No surprise that they eventually gave that up for ad money.
Next step will be to have that screen in colour and animated. And speakers.
rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 4 days ago
Blackmist@feddit.uk 4 days ago
CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 4 days ago
Saw one of those yesterday. Should be super illegal, they’re so bright.
over_clox@lemmy.world 5 days ago
I saw one of those big rig trucks where the trailer was completely covered in LED advertising displays, on the left, right and back.
One of the ads was regarding broken phones, saying something along the lines of ‘broken glass is a good thing’. Don’t quote me on the exact wording though, I only saw that ad once, but it was regarding trade-ins and upgrades.
Kinda ironic to have such an ad displayed on a truck where you’re tempted to bust their display with a sledgehammer…
Professorozone@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Truly mildly infuriating. Nicely done.
rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 4 days ago
I’m fortunate that the bins on my street are collected twice-daily. The trade-off is that the bins lorries have LED sides. Lights up my entire bedroom when they pull up. I’m also opposite a pub, so every Wednesday morning starting around 7 it’s non-stop clanging from barrel deliveries. I live above two shopfronts, so every morning through midnight is bullshit noises. I live under a lamppost, so the council putting up Christmas lights means a cherry picker staring through my windows. I’m just bitching, but the LED buses and lorries are fuckin wild.
Crikeste@lemm.ee 4 days ago
How does your city produce enough trash to justify pickups twice daily? That’s fuckin’ wild lol
rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 4 days ago
It’s London mate, twice a day rubbish pickup on my street and the fuckin place is still full of rats. Still, cheap protein in a pot noodle innit!
hperrin@lemmy.ca 4 days ago
Whoever*
Whom is an object, who is a subject. An object usually follows prepositions like “to”, so it’s good instinct to use whomever here, but in this case the object is the entire clause “whoever invented …”, so the whoever is the subject of the verb invented.
itskindafake@lemmynsfw.com 4 days ago
seriously though whom the fuck cares
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Having been to Manchester very recently, I can think of bigger things to complain about.
(Not that I have room to talk, being in Blackburn.)
Grass@sh.itjust.works 4 days ago
here just the city lights, and city street high beamers, and tall trucks that have only high beams and higher beams… anyway those are blinding enough as it is
JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 days ago
It’s not that they’re LEDs, it’s that they’re too bright.
frezik@midwest.social 4 days ago
At the very least, can they not be blue? It’s the worst color at night.
Red would be best–it fucks with your eyes the least–but there’s often legal limits on red lights (besides brake/turn signals) on non-emergency vehicles. Something in orange or yellow would be less harsh.
jordanlund@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Wait until you see the ones with video screens…
CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 5 days ago
RedShadowWizard@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Anyway here is how to tell if LED sign is cheap
militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 4 days ago
But what if someone doesn’t see it? What then?
CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 days ago
I haven’t had the displeasure yet.
viralJ@lemmy.world 4 days ago
What made you unable to look in a different direction?
ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Sir, this is c/mildlyinfuriating, let me whinge in peace.
CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 days ago
Really? Count the things you’re not allowed to show in public. It’s almost like you can’t go through life with your eyes literally closed so the world doesn’t bother you.
You have to know that, though, so you must be trolling.
squid_slime@lemm.ee 4 days ago
Stage coach?
i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca 5 days ago
Please don’t open my child.
jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 5 days ago
Image
SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world 4 days ago
Image
SeekPie@lemm.ee 4 days ago
Put the knife away Waltuh
frosty@pawb.social 4 days ago
I saw this, too, and I don’t even have a child.
refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 5 days ago
www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLZsW8fR-kw