It genuinely took me a while to see what was wrong with it, my brain was autocorrecting it
This page in my kid’s book from school to learn how to read.
Submitted 1 year ago by LazaroFilm@lemmy.world to mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/5e376585-33b8-4213-b181-ac13e91ff046.jpeg
Comments
TheBlue22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
Barack_Embalmer@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Many modern theories in cognitive science posit that the brain’s objective is to be a kind of “prediction machine” to predict the incoming stream of sensory information from the top down, as well as processing it from the bottom up. This is sometimes referred to through the aphorism “perception is controlled hallucination”.
intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 year ago
So human thought is … text prediction?
TheBlue22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
That sounds extremely interesting, i gotta look into that when i have more time
jennwiththesea@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Even after reading your comment, it took me three more tries to see it! Wild.
morganth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year ago
See, I thought it was mildly infuriating because the images aren’t “many types of airplanes”, they’re only a few types of airplanes repeated at different sizes or different angles.
ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 1 year ago
“There are many words.”
[Page with the word “word” in 3D at 10 different angles and rotations.]
JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Maddie@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Well, they are
jaykay@lemmy.zip 1 year ago
I read „there are” until I saw this comment lol brain got TOO automatic
cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 1 year ago
SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 1 year ago
Disregarding the bad grammar, the picture shows a terrible variety of airplanes. They’re all some sort of commercial passenger jet.
It’s like saying, “there’s so many kinds of motorcycles!” while showing only various Harleys. Let’s just ignore the dirt bikes, sport bikes, and everything in between.
not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 1 year ago
This ladies and gentlemen is an example of people using ai to make kid books. It’s a big thing right now and easy money but could have consequence if kids start reading these at a young age.
francisfordpoopola@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Don’t try to redirect stupidity from people to computers. We’re more than capable of doing stupid things without the help of our AI overlords.
HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Damn right i am
Ddhuud@lemmy.world 1 year ago
No. AI wouldn’t mess up like that. It could spew other kinds of shit, but with excellent syntax. It’s far more likely for humans to make mistakes like that.
squaresinger@feddit.de 1 year ago
This ladies and gentlemen is an example of people using ai to make kid books. It’s a big thing right now and easy money but could have consequence if kids start reading
thesethey at a young age.FTFY
intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 year ago
They is for thorses
abcd@feddit.de 1 year ago
The good thing is: This type of book is read by parents to their 1-3 year old kids. You show the pictures and can filter weird sentences. This is not a book a 9 year old is going to read 😉
Kolanaki@yiffit.net 1 year ago
What’s wrong? They are many different airplanes. Why are they airplanes and not people, though?
waigl@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Using “they” when you haven’t yet established the group you are referring to in context feels weird and kinda wrong, especially if it’s about a group of inanimate objects. It really looks like the word should have been “there”, but they just mistyped and then didn’t catch the error in the editing process or didn’t bother to correct it.
LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It’s in a book for 5 years old to learn to read. It’s supposed to be simple words in simple sentences. This is not it.
JustZ@lemmy.world 1 year ago
This is the only post in the entire thread attempting to parse the grammar.
It feels wrong because as you pointed out, as text, the pronoun “they” has no antecedent. Who are they?
But there is a picture, too. That’s them!
It’s not just type, it’s typography. You have to analyze the grammar of something like one page of a picture book or a movie poster or advert in its context.
LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Should be “There”
Sensitivezombie@lemmy.zip 1 year ago
The issue is on both pages. Lack of knowledge of English on one, and lazy copy/pasta of similar airplanes on the other.
Bagel5941@aussie.zone 1 year ago
TIL that aeroplane is commonwealth english.
Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 1 year ago
No, “airplane” is simplified English, for simpletons
“Aeroplane” is fancypants English
thecrotch@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Americans invented it, Americans get to name it
dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Brought to you by the people who spell jail as gaol
TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 year ago
…no. Non-US English speakers absolutely do not say gaol instead of jail lmao and haven’t for hundreds of years.
HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
downvotes of those that don’t know that’s actually a word.
BrownianMotion@lemmy.world 1 year ago
There are many kinds…
They are is incorrect, and the word “so” is superfluous.
blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Spoken like a true Grammarly AI tool for all those extra words.
They’re practically useless if you’re going for nice prose and emphasis…
There are many kinds of airplanes!
There are sooooooo~ many kinds of airplanes! 🛬🛫 🛩️✈️
JustZ@lemmy.world 1 year ago
They are different.
Classy@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
I guess the problem is that, while technically accurate English, it’s a pretty non-standard usage. One sees a page full of a variety of planes and it’s expected that the following text will make a general statement on planes as an idea: There are so many kinds of planes!
To refer to a group as the book does, it’s just kind of clunky and awkward, and on top of that so many kinds is, in my experience, just an unusual adjective form. Teaching children how to read isn’t just about learning how to sound out words: it’s also about how to suss out their meaning, and a child at this reading level may have a hard time understanding the more abstract grammatical form that this book decided to take.
dutchkimble@lemy.lol 1 year ago
I guess there’s 2 things. One is people being picky about ‘They are’ vs. ‘They are’ and the second is that they’ve probably not shown a very wide variety
JustZ@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I see it. “There are” and “they are” are different sentences with slightly different meanings. Writing this way is correct and j thknknupull find someone in older children’s books and even adult books. Tolkien wrote often in this way that sounds clunky to the modern ear. I read a lot of old stuff so to me it sounds more familiar and correct even.
ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 1 year ago
My subconscious autocorrected that the first time I read it. It was only after reading your comment and going back to look again that I realized they had not written “There are”.
RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 1 year ago
But they aren’t, then. That’s one kind of plane, which technically isn’t even called an airplane, because it’s a jet plane.
JustZ@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Yeah, okay, clever. All different brands and configurations.
charonn0@startrek.website 1 year ago
Who is so many airplanes?
JustZ@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Look in your left hand.
azvasKvklenko@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Funny that as a non-native I’m less likely to make such a mistake than natives. At some point I had to learn the basics or something
LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Same here I’m French native. The there their they’re thing doesn’t affect me.
rosymind@leminal.space 1 year ago
I’ve always been a native English speaker, but my first 11 years of education weren’t in the U.S. I also don’t have an issue with: their, there, and they’re.
Affect and effect were tough for me, though. I still have to think about it for a moment
And slightly off topic, I still can’t tell the difference between pansexual and bisexual. Each time I feel like I have a decent internal definition someone comes along to inform me that I’ve got it wrong
camelbeard@lemmy.world 1 year ago
They are so many good kind of AI written books nowdays
LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Funny enough, I bet an Ai would not make that mistake.
camelbeard@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Just like a human it really depends on what you feed your AI as training data.
charonn0@startrek.website 1 year ago
Probably went like: There are->There’re->They’re->They are
Xenos@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Their’re
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 year ago
What’s wrong with it?
FireWire400@lemmy.world 1 year ago
That reminds me, why do so many people confuse “they’re”, “their” and “there”?
thecrotch@sh.itjust.works 1 year ago
Because we speak a very stupid language that has words that are pronounced the same but spelled different
Retrograde@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Fondots@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Because their committed to the bit that the only thing they learned in school is that “the mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell.”
dan@upvote.au 1 year ago
The same reason people confuse your, you’re, yore and yaw I guess.
RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Guess what gets assembled in factories in Texas…
LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Do there make planes there?
UndulyUnruly@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Pft. Can’t even spell they’re. Figure it out.
Kethal@lemmy.world 1 year ago
All airplanes are jetliners.
GiddyGap@lemm.ee 1 year ago
When Ron DeSantis and Greg Abbott join forces to create the new learning plan…
roguetrick@kbin.social 1 year ago
I don't get it.
someguy3@lemmy.world 1 year ago
“They [sic] are…”
My brain just filled it in, I had to read the comments to notice.
AFallingAnvil@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
That’s literally just civilian airliners. Only one type of plane
roguetrick@kbin.social 1 year ago
Sure, but they're different in kind. Double deckers, twin engine.
specseaweed@lemmy.world 1 year ago
So is this just some AI generated crap or what
driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 1 year ago
Draw some Trade Center Towers on the page with the text and everytime you pass the page you can have your own 9/11
Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year ago
That airport is too busy. I feel bad for the controllers.
snf@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Shortstop’s the best position they is.
relevants@feddit.de 1 year ago
Grammar aside, it’s an odd choice to fill up half the page with 747s if you want to showcase the variety of commercial passenger airplanes.
HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I’m more annoyed at the lack of anything prop.
Not everything is a international long haul.