Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

Twinkle twinkle little star

⁨917⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net⁩ to ⁨science_memes@mander.xyz⁩

https://slrpnk.net/pictrs/image/5d522466-969e-4dd3-9c03-09cac7a23e5b.jpeg

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    No scientists must dress as stereotypical nerds its literally the law.

    source
    • ivanafterall@lemmy.world ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      I assume the sunglasses in her profile picture are prescription/ corrective sunglasses.

      source
      • Hupf@feddit.org ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Image

        source
    • hanrahan@piefed.social ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Didn’t that dude doing the blackhole research end up getting pilloried for wearing a shirt his sister gifted him ?

      source
      • toynbee@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨hour⁩ ago

        I didn’t know scientists would put you in a stockade.

        source
      • AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Context it was aheago (I might have spelled that wrong, at work and can’t check) anime fabric, which might be questionable in a professional work environment.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • jonathan@piefed.social ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Bro did you see the shirt?

        source
  • SuperEars@lemmy.world ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Could the letter have been written by a thirsty adult?

    source
    • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      The gown is reasonably chaste so they’d be thirsting for science rather than the female body. And there’s plenty of science communicators who look sluttier yet smart in their presentation.

      source
      • I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Some of us thirst for science and sparkles.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Who? (Asking for a friend)

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • ButteryMonkey@piefed.social ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Do you have any links to these, or names I can look for? I’m genuinely into that sort of social norm bucking, as a comfort-in-skin-over-propriety sort of gal myself, and learning stuff (mostly any science-adjacent stuff) is my special interest - my degree and life focus is in science communication (I can’t help but infodump so I learned how to do it properly!)!

        I mean naked news was(is?) super popular; why not fuck-me-branded science?

        source
  • Aquila@sh.itjust.works ⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Whys this in memes? Its very wholesome! Or is op just being a dick?

    source
    • Chronographs@lemmy.zip ⁨20⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      There’s nothing that says memes can’t be wholesome

      source
      • Aquila@sh.itjust.works ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Fair enough

        source
    • DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Can’t put it science, they’ll gripe, “Why is this fluff cluttering up my feed?!”

      It fits well enough in Science Memes, tho.

      source
      • Scubus@sh.itjust.works ⁨18⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Yeah, i dont follow c/science, but id imagine its more for scientific advancement. This def seems like the best community for this meme

        source
    • WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      “Screenshot of tweet = meme” is probably the thought behind it?

      source
    • Squirrelsdrivemenuts@lemmy.world ⁨19⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Science memes is more than just memes to make fun of things. It’s all things science and fun/wholesome.

      source
  • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I have a shiny scale that goes from 0 to 10. 0 is dull, 5 is magpies are actively interested, and 10 is anyone who stares it is irreversibly blind.

    source
    • GraniteM@lemmy.world ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Image

      source
      • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Completely off topic, I have a Soulbound character that is an Ogor who wears a ballroom gown because he bounced a fancy party. He took a shin to the all the fancy dresses.

        I also had someone at the table play a Tortle in DnD with a bedazzled shell.

        source
  • ButteryMonkey@piefed.social ⁨11⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Is there a video of this talk? I’d love love love to see it if possible!

    I like ladies in sparkly things being smart. I do it sometimes myself, anlong with bright colors and vivid patterns, and it’s wildly fun! Clothing doesn’t matter, so have fun with it!

    source
    • toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfU4d8fF5pg

      here’s a ‘ted’ thing she did. hopefully this won’t post twice again.

      source
  • minorkeys@lemmy.world ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Girls wont want to do a thing unless they can look pretty?

    source
    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨16⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      You’re getting down voted right now and I think it’s important to understand why because I had a similar reaction not too long ago. I was curious to understand my own biases and what I think it’s important to share what I learned as a cis male in IT.

      Women just want to be women. Some want to wear nail polish and “look pretty” while others want to just rock a T-shirt and jeans. Like men who wear full tux and debug code at 6pm on a Friday (because they aren’t farmers), they want to be what they want to be.

      Men have the luxury to wear whatever they want (for the most part) and not get shit for it. Women have to do everything that men do and do it with maturity while handing the shit that men throw their way.

      I learned this lesson when I was the sole male STEM counselor at an all girls camp. It was a volunteer gig that my company put together. They had last minute cancellations and I had time on my calendar and so I volunteered. I did not know it was all girls and I certainly did not know I’d be the only guy.

      I stayed curious and helped where I could. My job was to be a project manager, help teams understand how to win their competition that had set requirements. So I walked them through all that and looked over their code. There as a dedicated “make up hour” where the girls were encouraged to make their presentations “pretty” with make up, glitter, etc. I personally found it pointless given how far behind we were but I kept my mouth shut.

      And I observed.

      The fact that these girls could do this and do IT was immensely powerful. You could see their spirits lifted. It rocked my world and made me check my own beliefs. Why not allow them to be pretty? Why not let them take an hour to put glitter and stickers on their board if it made them happy?

      Did we win? No. But they enjoyed it.

      In my 20+ years in tech, we need more women because they bring perspective in ways I don’t. Not because they want to be pretty because they provide insight in ways I don’t expect. Anything I can do to help make that happen I’ll gladly do.

      source
      • Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        I like you.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • jupiter_jazz@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨13⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Sorry think that guy is a troll but appreciate your response.

        source
        • -> View More Comments
      • minorkeys@lemmy.world ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Uh…k…not sure which part do that relates to my question?

        source
    • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Girls want to be able to choose how to look. Femininity often causes people in the sciences (and other places too) to take you less seriously. So, there’s negative consequences to choosing to look pretty, making it less of a free choice.

      source
      • minorkeys@lemmy.world ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        So they will avoid doing things if how they look doing them isn’t how they want to look?

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • Nefara@lemmy.world ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      I have a female friend in STEM who has dealt with an immense amount of misogyny in her field. She’s been the only woman in the room more times than she can keep track of. She has achieved a lot academically, but feels a pressure to conform to a standard of behavior set by men. She loves pink, collects dolls, paints her nails and is unabashedly feminine, and has suffered real social and professional consequences for her gender presentation. It’s literally an act of bravery for her to go to work in a soft fuzzy pink sweater.

      I get that the question here is implying that either all little girls are so obsessed with pretty sparkly things that the lack of it would be a detractor, or that it’s reductive to assume that they would and that femininity can take many forms. However, it’s a valid desire to want to do a thing and be accepted for how you are. If a little girl does love pink and glitter and all classically coded feminine things, seeing someone like you in STEM blazing that trail and making a place for you, is just as validating as seeing other minorities in admirable positions. Representation matters.

      source
      • Eq0@literature.cafe ⁨41⁩ ⁨minutes⁩ ago

        I will add my own story. Woman, in STEM, I mostly don’t care about what I wear, but sometimes I want to rock it just because. Put on make up, do my nails, wear a skirt. I kept that out of the office until I moved to a department with a flourishing gay community. If they can wear nail polish and skirts, so can I! I’m still usually the only woman in any given room.

        As a counterpoint, for a while I was the fanciest dressing person of the department because none of my T-shirts had holes 😒 also got told, jokingly, to not overdo it the one time I wore a shirt.

        source
      • khannie@lemmy.world ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        I have a female friend in STEM who has dealt with an immense amount of misogyny in her field.

        That’s really fucking depressing :(

        source
      • minorkeys@lemmy.world ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        So…no? Not beleiving they can be pretty does discourage girls from choosing to do things?

        source
        • -> View More Comments
    • Xenny@lemmy.world ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Boys can’t do a thing unless they can look cool?

      There’s a big push in media representation that scientific girls are nerdy and not focused on their looks. Having that opposite representation that scientists can be pretty too is important. It shows that girls who are focused on their looks can totally be smart too. This was the entire plot of legally blonde.

      source
      • minorkeys@lemmy.world ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Shouldn’t the comparison be ‘won’t’, not ‘can’t’?

        source
      • Vanth@reddthat.com ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Ooooooh, I thought it a message for men not admit to knowing last year’s shoe fashion while on the witness stand for murder. Because, you know, a guy would have to be gay to know a thing like that.

        So pretty women can be smart, check. Pretty gay men can be murderers, check. That’s enough personal growth for today!

        source
    • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub ⁨15⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      That’s like asking if boys don’t want to do stuff unless they can turn it into a game or competition.

      source
      • minorkeys@lemmy.world ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Similar. Do they not?

        source
    • ch00f@lemmy.world ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Sure why not?

      source
      • minorkeys@lemmy.world ⁨14⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        I don’t know.

        source