Out of 10. Be specific!

Comments

• Mrkawfee@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Reminds me of an early Bart Simpson

  source

  • Quadhammer@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Looks like Barts older cousin

    source
• Squirrelsdrivemenuts@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I immediately downvoted this fork… then scrolled back because I hate the fork, not the post. -238/10

  source
• DarkSirrush@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Fuck OP for posting this awful fork/10

  source
• db2@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Knork/10

  source

  • ObviouslyNotBanana@piefed.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Not specific but technically follows the set rating system

    source
• ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Insulting/purely decorative out of 10.

  source
• Rivalarrival@lemmy.today ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  This fork isn’t stamped out of sheet steel. It appears to have been forged out of a round bar stock. For that alone, it receives high marks, despite the unconventional appearance.

  8/10.

  source
• _stranger_@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  2. I hate it, but it appears functional

  source
• SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Image

  source
• finitebanjo@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Crab Fork

  8/10 dependent on reasonably sized crab to accommodate.

  source

  • shalafi@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Also good for oysters!

    source
• Professorozone@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Limited usefulness because it’s too narrow. Don’t like the asymmetry. Appearance looks a little crude. I wouldn’t want one. Tines seem overly sharp.

  Probably good for getting olives out of jars.

  source
• RmDebArc_5@piefed.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  3.145183813819291837

  Specific enough?

  source

  • Typhoon@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    I guess but I’d prefer a rational answer.

    source

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      That is a rational number

      source

      • -> View More Comments
  • ObviouslyNotBanana@piefed.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Yes, that's technically allowed.

    source
• hansolo@lemmy.today ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Why TF is Lemmy’s nerodiversity waypoints forks and bricks?

  I mean, that’s half of mine. How did we get here?

  source

  • tamal3@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Bricks? I’ve seen a surprising amount about utensils, but I think i missed the bricks.

    source

    • hansolo@lemmy.today ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

      It was a couple days ago, some greentext post about some anon’s brother hates cement and cement blocks.

      lemmy.today/post/36312407

      source
• dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  Because that fork has trisomy 21.

  source
• kwilson@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I’d give it a perfect 5/7

  source
• Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I rate everything like Jason from The Good Place, a 1 to 13 scale with 8 as the highest. I give this a 10.

  source

  • Nalivai@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Number five is number one. Number seven is number two. Number three and number four are tied for number three.

    source
• GoddessGundy@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  If I got it at Goodwill for $.10, 6/10 because obviously that’s a manufacturing dud but I’ll give it a good home and use it when all the other utensils are dirty.

  I wouldn’t be surprised to see this pathetic waste in some Michelin star restaurant pretending it’s trendy and they wasted hundreds buying 200 for $15 each. In that case -5/10.

  source

  • untorquer@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Nah the michelin waste should be higher because some rich asshole lost an investment and some chef got a dream job for a while.

    source
• piefood@feddit.online ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  It looks like someone made a fork based on a kids drawing of a fork

  source
• Badabinski@kbin.earth ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  backscratcher/10

  source
• jim3692@discuss.online ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I prefer this one. Way more area in the handle for better grip.

  Image

  source

  • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    That’s not a fork that’s a thnork

    source
• Nariom@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  5/7

  source

  • rmuk@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Perfect.

    source

    • ObviouslyNotBanana@piefed.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      100%

      source
• trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  I can not rate this based on this photo. It doesn’t even show the complete fork. And how much does it weigh? Where’s the banana for scale?

  source

  • ObviouslyNotBanana@piefed.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    Image

    source

    • lunarul@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      That’s somehow worse

      source
    • Kabulanolac@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      It looks like a Botero painting

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  1. It’s not a good spork

  source
• falynns@lemmy.world ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  3/10. Not great, Bob.

  source
• icelimit@lemmy.ml ⁨5⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I like the 3 increasing gaps in the tines.

  8/10 dessert fork conversation piece.

  Also stealthy stabby. Might hide in a hidden emergency drawer.

  source
• captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Pretentious restaurant/10. They’re going to serve you bubbles or pour chocolate sauce on your hands or some dumb shit.

  source
• hissingmeerkat@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Certainly less than a full 4.

  source
• HikingVet@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  -2/10

  source
• caseyweederman@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Zero thousand.

  source
• affenlehrer@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  More practical than many Star Trek forks

  source
• Wutchilli@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  3/10 Probably balanced OK and has a certain comfy weight in your hand. But the shape is , all by very distinct, no good at differentiating between handle and fork head. Function wise is the ability to poke food with the fork in question OK but could be improved. But the ability to scoop things up is lost with this fork, the head is just to small and to thick. And i personally hate the different dept oft cut in the forkhead.

  source