I immediately downvoted this fork… then scrolled back because I hate the fork, not the post. -238/10
Out of 10. Be specific!
Submitted 2 months ago by ObviouslyNotBanana@piefed.world to [deleted]
https://media.piefed.world/posts/7D/C6/7DC6jPk9fFyYAbN.webp
Comments
Squirrelsdrivemenuts@lemmy.world 2 months ago
DarkSirrush@lemmy.ca 2 months ago
Fuck OP for posting this awful fork/10
db2@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Knork/10
ObviouslyNotBanana@piefed.world 2 months ago
Not specific but technically follows the set rating system
ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Insulting/purely decorative out of 10.
Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 2 months ago
This fork isn’t stamped out of sheet steel. It appears to have been forged out of a round bar stock. For that alone, it receives high marks, despite the unconventional appearance.
8/10.
_stranger_@lemmy.world 2 months ago
- I hate it, but it appears functional
SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 months ago
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Crab Fork
8/10 dependent on reasonably sized crab to accommodate.
shalafi@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Also good for oysters!
Professorozone@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Limited usefulness because it’s too narrow. Don’t like the asymmetry. Appearance looks a little crude. I wouldn’t want one. Tines seem overly sharp.
Probably good for getting olives out of jars.
RmDebArc_5@piefed.zip 2 months ago
3.145183813819291837
Specific enough?
Typhoon@lemmy.ca 2 months ago
I guess but I’d prefer a rational answer.
agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
That is a rational number
ObviouslyNotBanana@piefed.world 2 months ago
Yes, that's technically allowed.
hansolo@lemmy.today 2 months ago
Why TF is Lemmy’s nerodiversity waypoints forks and bricks?
I mean, that’s half of mine. How did we get here?
tamal3@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Bricks? I’ve seen a surprising amount about utensils, but I think i missed the bricks.
hansolo@lemmy.today 1 month ago
It was a couple days ago, some greentext post about some anon’s brother hates cement and cement blocks.
dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 1 month ago
Because that fork has trisomy 21.
kwilson@lemmy.world 2 months ago
I’d give it a perfect 5/7
Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 2 months ago
I rate everything like Jason from The Good Place, a 1 to 13 scale with 8 as the highest. I give this a 10.
Nalivai@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Number five is number one. Number seven is number two. Number three and number four are tied for number three.
GoddessGundy@lemmy.world 1 month ago
If I got it at Goodwill for $.10, 6/10 because obviously that’s a manufacturing dud but I’ll give it a good home and use it when all the other utensils are dirty.
I wouldn’t be surprised to see this pathetic waste in some Michelin star restaurant pretending it’s trendy and they wasted hundreds buying 200 for $15 each. In that case -5/10.
untorquer@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Nah the michelin waste should be higher because some rich asshole lost an investment and some chef got a dream job for a while.
piefood@feddit.online 2 months ago
It looks like someone made a fork based on a kids drawing of a fork
Badabinski@kbin.earth 2 months ago
backscratcher/10
jim3692@discuss.online 2 months ago
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 month ago
That’s not a fork that’s a thnork
Nariom@lemmy.world 2 months ago
5/7
trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 2 months ago
I can not rate this based on this photo. It doesn’t even show the complete fork. And how much does it weigh? Where’s the banana for scale?
ObviouslyNotBanana@piefed.world 2 months ago
lunarul@lemmy.world 2 months ago
That’s somehow worse
Kabulanolac@piefed.social 2 months ago
It looks like a Botero painting
MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
- It’s not a good spork
falynns@lemmy.world 1 month ago
3/10. Not great, Bob.
icelimit@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
I like the 3 increasing gaps in the tines.
8/10 dessert fork conversation piece.
Also stealthy stabby. Might hide in a hidden emergency drawer.
captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
Pretentious restaurant/10. They’re going to serve you bubbles or pour chocolate sauce on your hands or some dumb shit.
hissingmeerkat@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
Certainly less than a full 4.
HikingVet@lemmy.ca 2 months ago
-2/10
caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 2 months ago
Zero thousand.
affenlehrer@feddit.org 2 months ago
More practical than many Star Trek forks
Wutchilli@feddit.org 2 months ago
3/10 Probably balanced OK and has a certain comfy weight in your hand. But the shape is , all by very distinct, no good at differentiating between handle and fork head. Function wise is the ability to poke food with the fork in question OK but could be improved. But the ability to scoop things up is lost with this fork, the head is just to small and to thick. And i personally hate the different dept oft cut in the forkhead.
Mrkawfee@feddit.uk 2 months ago
Reminds me of an early Bart Simpson
Quadhammer@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Looks like Barts older cousin