Because that fork has trisomy 21.
Out of 10. Be specific!
Submitted 1 day ago by ObviouslyNotBanana@piefed.world to [deleted]
https://media.piefed.world/posts/7D/C6/7DC6jPk9fFyYAbN.webp
Comments
dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 15 hours ago
GoddessGundy@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
If I got it at Goodwill for $.10, 6/10 because obviously that’s a manufacturing dud but I’ll give it a good home and use it when all the other utensils are dirty.
I wouldn’t be surprised to see this pathetic waste in some Michelin star restaurant pretending it’s trendy and they wasted hundreds buying 200 for $15 each. In that case -5/10.
untorquer@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
Nah the michelin waste should be higher because some rich asshole lost an investment and some chef got a dream job for a while.
DarkSirrush@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
Fuck OP for posting this awful fork/10
Squirrelsdrivemenuts@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I immediately downvoted this fork… then scrolled back because I hate the fork, not the post. -238/10
olafurp@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
Will-stab-my-eye-out-to-never-see-it-again/10
MTK@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
7/10
Would suck for most situations but would excel in a few specific situations
falynns@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
3/10. Not great, Bob.
Donkter@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
Excellent for pokin’ olives. 7/10
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
I was gonna say eyes
_stranger_@lemmy.world 1 day ago
- I hate it, but it appears functional
SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 day ago
Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 day ago
This fork isn’t stamped out of sheet steel. It appears to have been forged out of a round bar stock. For that alone, it receives high marks, despite the unconventional appearance.
8/10.
MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 19 hours ago
- It’s not a good spork
ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Insulting/purely decorative out of 10.
db2@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Knork/10
ObviouslyNotBanana@piefed.world 1 day ago
Not specific but technically follows the set rating system
kinther@lemmy.world 15 hours ago
Gonna be a 3/10 from me dawg
icelimit@lemmy.ml 18 hours ago
I like the 3 increasing gaps in the tines.
8/10 dessert fork conversation piece.
Also stealthy stabby. Might hide in a hidden emergency drawer.
Professorozone@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Limited usefulness because it’s too narrow. Don’t like the asymmetry. Appearance looks a little crude. I wouldn’t want one. Tines seem overly sharp.
Probably good for getting olives out of jars.
untorquer@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
Something about the shape tells me this will be a 10/10 x-ray during an emergency room visit.
Kolanaki@pawb.social 9 hours ago
4 out of 5 prongs.
TastyWheat@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
Tines are uneven, 4/10
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Crab Fork
8/10 dependent on reasonably sized crab to accommodate.
shalafi@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Also good for oysters!
orenj@sopuli.xyz 14 hours ago
8/10. While inneficient in material usage, its streamlined form and unique silhouette should make it easy to clean and find if one of the fam accidentally takes it home.
jim3692@discuss.online 1 day ago
HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
That’s not a fork that’s a thnork
kwilson@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I’d give it a perfect 5/7
DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
I like my forks like I like my women, thick and tall. I rate this fork 10/10.
hansolo@lemmy.today 1 day ago
Why TF is Lemmy’s nerodiversity waypoints forks and bricks?
I mean, that’s half of mine. How did we get here?
tamal3@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
Bricks? I’ve seen a surprising amount about utensils, but I think i missed the bricks.
hansolo@lemmy.today 7 hours ago
It was a couple days ago, some greentext post about some anon’s brother hates cement and cement blocks.
RmDebArc_5@piefed.zip 1 day ago
3.145183813819291837
Specific enough?
ObviouslyNotBanana@piefed.world 1 day ago
Yes, that's technically allowed.
Toes@ani.social 17 hours ago
Looks pretty standard to me
Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 1 day ago
I rate everything like Jason from The Good Place, a 1 to 13 scale with 8 as the highest. I give this a 10.
Nalivai@lemmy.world 20 hours ago
Number five is number one. Number seven is number two. Number three and number four are tied for number three.
Mrkawfee@feddit.uk 1 day ago
Reminds me of an early Bart Simpson
Quadhammer@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
Looks like Barts older cousin