Out of 10. Be specific!

Comments

• Badabinski@kbin.earth ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  backscratcher/10

  source
• Toes@ani.social ⁨23⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Looks pretty standard to me

  source
• captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Pretentious restaurant/10. They’re going to serve you bubbles or pour chocolate sauce on your hands or some dumb shit.

  source
• Nariom@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  5/7

  source

  • rmuk@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Perfect.

    source

    • ObviouslyNotBanana@piefed.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      100%

      source
• trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  I can not rate this based on this photo. It doesn’t even show the complete fork. And how much does it weigh? Where’s the banana for scale?

  source

  • ObviouslyNotBanana@piefed.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    Image

    source

    • lunarul@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      That’s somehow worse

      source
    • Kabulanolac@piefed.social ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      It looks like a Botero painting

      source

      • -> View More Comments
• Siegfried@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  5 because it at least appears to do the job

  source
• hissingmeerkat@sh.itjust.works ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Certainly less than a full 4.

  source
• HikingVet@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  -2/10

  source
• caseyweederman@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Zero thousand.

  source
• affenlehrer@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  More practical than many Star Trek forks

  source
• Wutchilli@feddit.org ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  3/10 Probably balanced OK and has a certain comfy weight in your hand. But the shape is , all by very distinct, no good at differentiating between handle and fork head. Function wise is the ability to poke food with the fork in question OK but could be improved. But the ability to scoop things up is lost with this fork, the head is just to small and to thick. And i personally hate the different dept oft cut in the forkhead.

  source
• Stillwater@sh.itjust.works ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  4/10, not for the unique tines but for the bulbous and tapered handle. Not as comfortable to hold and use as your standard fork.

  source
• MeatPilot@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  That looks like a fork at a snooty restaurant where they try to convince you that this fork is better than regular fork. Because you experience the chefs childhood struggles as you try scoop up your cashew foam and baked stick.

  source
• tryagain@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Doesn’t matter what the scale is: it’s still zero.

  source

  • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨21⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Joke’s on you, the scale is from 3 to 17.

    source
• rmuk@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  4k

  source
• dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  I am particular about forks and spoons, preferring they are thin and relatively straight - this fork looks too thick, but I don’t mind how narrow it is

  source
• owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca ⁨2⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Dali/10

  source
• TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Looks like it has good mouth-feel. As a fidget toy, 5/10; as a fork, 2/10

  source

  • zululove@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    You like a good mouthfeel don’t cha

    source
• burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  4/10.

  Great for its intended use, but performs very poorly at some fork functions.

  source
• And009@lemmynsfw.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  5.67/10

  source