But how can you expect me to think about things like this, when there’s a possibility of someone with genitals that don’t look like mine in my restroom?
When Americans Fly Economy, They're Actually Paying for Someone Else to Fly Private
Submitted 14 hours ago by Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world
Comments
Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 8 hours ago
Have you ever seen a ducks penis? Just be glad whatever genitals you have isn’t a ducks penis. It’s so fucked up that they don’t even GET a bathroom. They just pee in the drinking water. They pee in lakes. Ponds. Your bathtub. They pee anywhere they want, any time they want.
Thats why they all hang out at parks, and the government doesn’t stop them. Think about it man. You don’t see lions and tigers and bears at the park…because Disney owns the rights to The Wizard of Oz. So you can’t see those animals for free! They gotta get locked up in jail and then they call it a zoo, and charge you $22.50 per adult, and $12 per child under 12. Except on Mondays where it’s free if you’re a local resident of the county.
But they don’t do that with ducks. You know what else Disney owns? The Mighty Ducks. Darkwing Duck.
And NOBODY is paying money to see those properties. So they don’t arrest the ducks, because theres no profit there. Follow the money. It all leads back to those crazy duck penis’s, and nobody wants to admit that Howard the Duck is officially a Marvel character, living in the same MCU as Spiderman, and Ironman, and the X-Men.
THATS why ducks don’t have bathrooms, while humans fight over things like trans athletes being allowed to play sports in college, and throwing green dildos at female basketball players to promote cryptocurrencies.
We live in the dumbest timeline.
AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
And yet Donald doesn’t even wear pants.
Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
Except on Mondays where it’s free if you’re a local resident of the county.
I read this and immediately knew who posted it.
Jrockwar@feddit.uk 13 hours ago
Could any kind soul provide a TL;DW for those of us who can’t watch a video (for whatever reason)?
AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 12 hours ago
- Tickets for flights are taxed at 7.5% to pay for the FAA
- Average flight with many passengers pays over $2,300 per flight
- Private jets don't have tickets to be taxed, are only taxed on fuel
- Private jets pay an average of about $60 in FAA fees
- Private jets take up about 7% of the FAA's resources, but only make up a fraction of a percent of the revenue
- Thus when you pay the FAA fees on your economy class ticket, you're subsidizing operating the FAA for private jet flights, that don't pay enough to cover their costs.
Cruxifux@feddit.nl 12 hours ago
That’s. So. Fucked.
Is shit like this doesnt radicalize you then you are lost as a human. Unsavablle.
Zorque@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
So not really the flights themselves, just the regulation overseeing the flights.
mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 hours ago
The FAA gathers taxes per person, not per plane. So a commercial flight has every single passenger paying, while a private jet only pays for a few people. But the air traffic controllers aren’t handling individual people; They’re handling planes. So private jets fund the ATC a lot less than commercial flights, even though they have just as much need.
This video says Canada taxes planes based on weight rating and distance traveled. So larger planes that can carry heavier loads (more people) get taxed more, while smaller planes (private jets) get taxed less. But they’re proportionally paying the same in taxes, instead of the rich people paying less.
tychosmoose@piefed.social 13 hours ago
There are long standing problems with this. Not sure of the exact point of the video, but here is an older article with some info:
https://www.newsweek.com/why-are-private-jets-being-subsidized-you-and-me-641890ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
Corporate jets use almost $1 billion of air traffic control resources, they only contribute around $200 million in fuel taxes, letting commercial passengers pick up their tab.
Generally, corporate jets are exempt from the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) air transportation tax, a fee on the number of passengers and amount of cargo transported, which funds 95 percent of ATC operations.
The maintenance and improvement of the ATC system’s equipment and infrastructure is paid through the Airport and Airway Trust Fund (AATF), which is made up of excise taxes collected on aviation fuel, passenger transport and use of international air facilities.
cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 9 hours ago
like everything in the 70s and 80s, airline deregulation was a stain that never should have happened
3abas@lemmy.world 2 hours ago
And nothing will be fixed while “the left” in the US still worship and lionize Carter, who started all the mess.
Yes, Trump is literally worse, but both parties are two sides of the same coin. You cannot save the country by electing neo-liberals, it’ll always be further right than before.
cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 hour ago
i actually was on wikipedia looking up an article on eastern airlines (i was watching ernest saves christmas and old things make me go down wikipedia rabbit holes) and was shocked it started in the 70s under him
LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 hours ago
Jesus Christ america
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
You don’t get rich by paying full freight.
sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 10 hours ago
If you are paying full freight that means you ain't in the club. And that's just disgusting... Imagine being associated with the dirty peasants?!
crandlecan@mander.xyz 14 hours ago
Damn, that’s something else altogether
spongebue@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
Ehhhh. I wasn’t very impressed with this video. For one thing, it felt more like a compilation of aviation-related clips rather than any kind of meat and potato that actually described the issue.
When they finally did, they started with the parking ramp analogy. If that truly is a good analogy, it’s not so much that a “fancy” car would pay less, it’s that a smaller car would. Pretty much any parking lot, ferry, etc that can hold different sizes of cars will charge more for a bus or semi truck than a regular car.
They also mention that fuel taxes are higher for small planes. I would love to know more about that, because that really could smooth things over but there aren’t really any details (also $2400 for [let’s just say] a 150-passenger 737 vs $60 for a private jet may scale similarly per passenger)
Finally, they very briefly bring up how Canada’s system is much better because it uses a factor of weight and distance… Wouldn’t that just mean those giant airliners pay more?!?
Bonus: let’s not kid ourselves into thinking that American Airlines is public transit. It’s still a for-profit corporation and if you lower a plane’s FAA taxes, it’ll directly benefit them.
pennomi@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
Per-passenger is a stupid way to charge this tax because the service provided is per-plane.
The math in this video checks out, even when spreading the costs over all the passengers of a larger plane.
DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world 6 hours ago
A lot of the FAA fee is used to fund the various airport facilities, so yes it does make sense to charge on per-passenger basis.
AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 12 hours ago
The fuel rates are currently about $0.22/gallon, and are going up to $1.06/gallon over 5 years, but even that wouldn't put them on par with commercial flights (they pay 0.6% of the fees, but use 7% of resources, $1.06 divided by $0.22 gets you 4.81x the current 0.6%, which is still 2.9% of the fees, while using 7% of FAA resources.)
So even with the current fuel rate increases, private jets would still be paying less than half of what they end up using.
egerlach@lemmy.ca 8 hours ago
As a percentage of the total weight of a plane, passengers and their luggage constitute a much larger percentage of a commercial flight than a private one. So they are “more utilized” than a private jet, and can spread that cost over all their passengers.
Also, larger planes that fly longer distances cross more ATC zones, using up more ATC resources. They also take up more “room” in the sky, as e.g. ATC needs to leave more room for jet wash behind a heavy. So it makes sense from multiple perspectives that bigger planes pay more.
You also have to consider hobby pilots. Charging them the same amount as a 747 would be insane.
So it’s a tradeoff: the Canadian system makes smaller planes pay more, proportionally, than a per-ticket model; but not so much more that it harms the smallest personal planes.
It’s also just simpler. Personal plane? Private jet? Commercial passenger flight? Cargo plane? Same calculation for all of them.
(Yes, you could try to make it “only for flights with paid passengers”, but then pilots of private jets would all of a sudden have a lot of very rich friends with whom they do a lot of personal flying. It’s just so much easier if there’s nothing subjective about it.)
twisted@sh.itjust.works 11 hours ago
But even if this tax was reduced or went away, what’s stopping the airlines from hiking up the price by that amount? Airlines are looking for any excuse to squeeze out more money from you. In that case you’d just be funding the airline execs’ private flights.
chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 hours ago
This is about taxes funding the FAA, and the implied conclusion of the video isn’t that these taxes should be removed, but that they should be weighted more heavily towards private flights for the sake of fairness.
CannedYeet@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
How would that even work? Commercial airlines and private jet operators are different entities.
arin@lemmy.world 13 hours ago
First class and business pays for the economy seats
egerlach@lemmy.ca 8 hours ago
While that’s true, and so First Class and Business Class subsidize private jets more than Economy Class does, that doesn’t change the fact that Economy also subsidizes private jets.
sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 10 hours ago
🤡
RushLana@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 hours ago
Why isn’t there high speed rail ??? The distance is only 700km ( 440 miles ) a french TGV can easily go over 300 km/h ( 185 mph ) so a direct line would at most be 2h30, given a plane boarding time it’s very competitive, conveninent and at a fraction of the operating cost.
atrielienz@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
“The Okefenokee Swamp is a shallow, 438,000-acre (177,000 ha), peat-filled wetland straddling the Georgia–Florida line in the United States. A majority of the swamp is protected by the Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge and the Okefenokee Wilderness. The Okefenokee Swamp is considered to be one of the Seven Natural Wonders of Georgia and is the largest “blackwater” swamp in North America.” -Wikipedia
Add to this Indian Reservation land, National Park/Preserve/ Wildlife Refuge land, the Everglades, other swamp/marshland, etc and you start to see that there’s several environmental challenges to a rail system from. Georgia to Orlando Florida.
RushLana@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 hours ago
According to gmaps there is a 4 lane highway between atlanta and orlando, I’m pretty sure you can squeeze train tracks there.
RangerAndTheCat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 hours ago
If the government or the billionaires really wanted to they’d just do it and fuck the Indians on repeat like every other time, it’s just a talking point and it’s not going to be”ez money” like the keystone pipeline. I wish our government gave two shits about treaties with not only the natives but anybody.
dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 11 hours ago
Because of the air industry (and car industry) lobbies.
zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 10 hours ago
Pretty much the hidden plot for who framed Roger rabbit
criticon@lemmy.ca 10 hours ago
How many are a final destination? Orlando is a big hub for planes coming from South America and Atlanta y the biggest US hub, so probably a lot of people flying that route are connecting and wouldn’t make a lot of sense to get a plane ticket and then a train and then another flight
RushLana@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 hours ago
It would absolutly make sense ? Especially if there are night trains that go slower and can help you get rest without paying an hotel.
BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 6 hours ago
You can have a high speed train station at the airport as well. A lot of European big hubs have that.
sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 10 hours ago
ATL is the second largest hub in the US after Chicago?
If you can fly pretty much anywhere from ATL in the world.