daniskarma
@daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- Comment on SNAIL PRO TIPS 1 day ago:
Last line really needs a citation.
Where I live they are plague. If you have them in your garden they will eat absolutely everything.
I love snails, and I have had them as pets sometimes. They are cute and fun. But most common species found in cities are not endangered afaik, quite the opposite.
- Comment on Which of theses games should i play? 1 day ago:
Yes. But world exploration tend to happen on horizontal.
Also additional height is often used as a way to store alternative dimensions (like nether or end). As there’s is not another built in way to do so.
- Comment on Resources 1 day ago:
Last reply, after blocking your because your insult.
Population control so not require any violent measure.
It can be as simple as making people lives better, as it have been proven that populations with higher life quality have less children. Then achievong the objective of having a lesser global population .
Discussion end here as you have been blocked.
- Comment on Which of theses games should i play? 1 day ago:
Of course. I’ve explorer bigger extensions of terrain in Minecraft.
- Comment on T.P. 14.000 Pages 2 days ago:
That’s a top youtube channel right there. Great fun to watch.
- Comment on At this point who in the world could stop Trump over doing something totally illegal? Like lets say using bunker buster bombs to destroy DEM cities? Or is USA communially FUCKED? 2 days ago:
How familiar are you with the concept of civil war?
If he would go to bomb an American city a civil war will start. Then they authority to stop him or not will rely on the winner of the war.
- Comment on [deleted] 2 days ago:
That’s the top pc you can buy nowadays, yes. Best consumer grade cpu and gpu, the rest of the specs are on par. Nice build.
- Comment on Petition to tell MasterCard, Visa, and activist groups to stop censoring legal fictional content 2 days ago:
Petition?
No, no, they should be legally enforced to do so.
- Comment on Junk Store 2.0 has released 2 days ago:
Because it reads more like advertisement of a paid product than news.
- Comment on Junk Store 2.0 has released 2 days ago:
You can be rewarded with the honor of paying a monthly subscription.
- Comment on Resources 2 days ago:
Once again the survival of the species is not on the line because of that.
That’s just an excuse you are making to justify a hate that have other roots.
Prove is in the complete disregard of proposed solutions: remote work, decentralized offices, traffic reduction instead of complete suppression. And apparently disregard for other forms of pollution that could be reduced or eliminated instead, for instance, international traveling.
- Comment on Resources 2 days ago:
not everyone have to live the way you enjoy living. Diversity is good.
- Comment on Which of theses games should i play? 2 days ago:
You can try both, see what you like.
I still like Minecraft Java more than Luanti.
My main grip with Luanti is world size. You can totally get to the world end in a few hours. I like the infinity of Minecraft.
- Comment on Resources 2 days ago:
I said in other comment. I’m not in the US, I’m in europe we have one of the best train networks of the world. Public transport is funded by the government so is cheaper, even completely free in some cases.
People living in rural areas still chose cara while they have the free will to do so.
If as a species we cannot find the way to make that work there’s no incentive for us to keep trying. Luckily I’m sure it’s possible, that people say it’s not just because propaganda. We have achieve harder things as a species. Surely we can have people in rural areas still using cars (electric cars for instance) without dooming humankind to extinction.
- Comment on Resources 2 days ago:
No. I think humanity should aim for absolutely every single human in every country in every single region, urban or rural could have a level of life quality comparable to what’s consider middle-high income level in USA/Europe.
If we cannot achieve that we’d better give up as an intelligent species and leave room for que squids to try.
- Comment on Resources 2 days ago:
Surely there’s a way of having people living rural, a totally valid life choice and also must needed for agriculture, having a good life, and not having a planet wide global extinction.
I get that in the US and some other countries one of the biggest divisions in voting is rural/urban, thus some people really feel vindicated on hating people that live rural and wanting to impose some penalties on them.
But if we cannot find an economic system that would lead to every person having a good life, regardless on where they live… Do we really want to have a future as a species?
- Comment on Resources 3 days ago:
Of course,
- Comment on Resources 3 days ago:
I live in Europe (Spain for reference). I think my country is the second one in the world in ultraspeed train network only behind china (or it used to).
People in rural areas still needs cars. In fact people in rural areas doesn’t even use trains for the most part. Buses work better. Still, living there without a car is a big drop in life quality.
We fund trains with public money to make them cheaper. Some trains are even FREE to the public, free as in you can hop in without paying. Still people don’t use trains in rural areas unless they have not access to a car. Because it’s imposible to have a network with enough frequency and travel time to match people expectations on transport.
- Comment on Resources 3 days ago:
You lack imagination. Plenty of ways to not kill people without having to recede to Palaeolithic levels of life quality.
- Comment on Resources 3 days ago:
I don’t want to live like people lived two thousands years ago, thanks.
- Comment on Resources 3 days ago:
What about people not living in cities?
Public transport for low density areas is terrible. So or you are forcing people to live in cities (where public transport can be good) or you are forcing people to endure terrible public transport.
Also forcing dietary changes on people…
I just don’t think forcing that on people would be clever. I know how I would react if anyone were to impose that way of living to me, and I can only assume that many people would react the same way.
- Comment on Resources 3 days ago:
I have a kitchen, a living room and two bedrooms. I do remote work so one of the bedrooms have a double purpose as guess room and office.
I would love to have at least, another room dedicated to storage. And second room so I could have a hobby/office room and a guess room separately.
Also I would love to have a garden.
I spent a lot of time at home, between remote work and hobbies, so I would like to have a more spacious living space. The more time you spent on a place the bigger it probably needs to be.
- Comment on Itch.io apologise for "frustration and confusion" after delisting thousands of NSFW projects 3 days ago:
At this point I would only try something untraceable like Monero. I don’t want the moral police to come knocking to my house saying that I bought something against the glory of the Lord.
- Comment on Resources 4 days ago:
I’m not mad. I will just not allow anyone to reduce my living standards because they don’t want to use a rubber.
A export model is not bad. I just said that’s unreasonable to think that all the world could follow that model. Because then “who would we export to?”. It’s like liberals thinking that the tax rate in a tax heaven are proof that every country could have those tax haven rates.
- Comment on Resources 4 days ago:
Reading the study I get the following remarks:
Living space, not great. 60m2 for a 4 person family. That’s tight. I live alone in a 90m2 house and I could use more space, do they want me to live in a 15m2 house or do they want to force to share living space? Sorry but I won’t compromise there. I prefer people having less children that me having to live as ants in a colony.
That is just a personal pick with the DLS minimum requirements chosen.
But still forgetting that. The reasoning is extremely faulty. Most of their argumentation heavy lifting is just relied to Millward-Hopkins (2022) paper establishing that 14.7 GJ per person anually is enough. That paper is just a work of fantasy. For reference, and taking the same paper numbers. Current energy usage (with all the exiting poverty) is 80 GJ/cap. Paleolitic use of energy was 5 GJ. Author is proposing that we could live ok with just triple paleolitic energy. That paper just oversees a lot of what people need to live in a function society to get completely irrational numbers on what energy cap we could assume to produce a good life.
Then on materials used. The paper assumes all the world shifting to vegetarian diet, everyone living on multiresidential buildings, somehow wood as the main building material (I don’t know how they even reconcile that with multiresidential buildings…). And half of cars usage shifting to public transport How to achieve this in rural areas it’s not mentioned at all).
A big notice needs to be done that both papers what are actually doing is basically taking China economy (greatly praised in the introduction) and assuming that all the world should live like that. And yes, probably the world could have 30 billion inhabitants if we accept to be all like China, who would we export to achieve that economic model if we all have a export based economy? who knows, probably the martians. And even then, while a lot of “ticks” on what a decent level of life quality apparently seems to be ticked, many people in western countries would not consider that quality life, but a very restrictive and deprived life standard.
I’m still on the boat the people having less children is a better approach to great lives without destroying the planet. At some point a cap on world population need to be made, it really add that much that the cap is 30 billion instead of maybe 5 billion? It’s certainly not a cap in the number of social iterations a person can have, but numbers give for plenty of friends. And at the end it’s not even a cap on “how many children” can people have, as once the cap is reach the number of children will be needed to cap the same to achieve stability. It’s just a cap on “when people can still be having lots of kids”. Boomer approach to “let’s have children now” and expect that my kids won’t want to have as many children as I have now.
- Comment on Stop Killing Games is facing a complaint in the EU that uses nonsense logic to accuse the movement's founder of failing to disclose financial contributions he never made: 'It's not paranoia if they re 5 days ago:
I’m pirating any game made by any producer that oppose SKG.
If they want to antagonize consumers. Consumers will be their enemies.
- Comment on I turned 30 yesterday but I look 18. Nobody believes me when I tell them my age. What do I do? Do I date a 20 year old guy or a 35 year old guy who looks twice my age? 5 days ago:
Date a 30 yo that looks like they are in their 60s for true shock value.
- Comment on Itch.io is delisting NSFW games due to pressure from payment processors 5 days ago:
People with a lot of money doesn’t really want just money. They want power to impose their views over the rest. Money is just a mean to do so.
- Comment on Itch.io is delisting NSFW games due to pressure from payment processors 5 days ago:
Buying drugs and gooner games. That’s the satoshi dream.
- Comment on [deleted] 6 days ago:
At that point you’ll have more fun working for a bank. You’ll be looking at less spreadsheets at least.