So, “what in the isomorphic fuck” covers all the bases?
fuckery
Submitted 1 day ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to science_memes@mander.xyz
https://mander.xyz/pictrs/image/f57b5c61-1076-4bff-ae99-6a586fd03c59.png
Comments
dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
Shardikprime@lemmy.world 7 hours ago
No, because then you enter into Homomorphic fucks.
Beyond that you have the ring of fucks.
Shit gets real within three field of fucks
Kolanaki@yiffit.net 1 day ago
Of course there is imaginary fucking. What do you think people do when they jerk off?
hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
No that’s simulated fucking. Imaginary would be a wet dream
theneverfox@pawb.social 21 hours ago
Both could be both. You could have an imaginary fuck while awake, you could have a simulated fuck with a wet dream that doesn’t involve any fucking, stimulating fucking without actually imagining it
red@sopuli.xyz 22 hours ago
Being all out of fucks to give also implies they are finite and exchangeable.
jerakor@startrek.website 12 hours ago
The oldest profession traded in it so they are arguably the original currency.
red@sopuli.xyz 11 hours ago
A good point 😅
absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 11 hours ago
Just because you are all out of fucks, doesn’t really have anything to do with the finite/infinite nature of all fucks.
red@sopuli.xyz 10 hours ago
If I have none, clearly I have to mine more with my GPU.
nyctre@lemmy.world 20 hours ago
A currency for sure. Both crypto and not
Zementid@feddit.nl 21 hours ago
Maybe Fucks are finite prime numbers?
over_clox@lemmy.world 1 day ago
What in the flying fuck implies there must also be falling fucks, running fucks, swimming fucks, lazy fucks, and fucking fucks.
If I’m missing something here, please fucking let me know.
SurfinBird@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
Went on vacation in NYC last year. Can confirm, was called a fucking fuck.
over_clox@lemmy.world 1 day ago
But were you called a pretty fuck or an ugly fuck?
Comment105@lemm.ee 18 hours ago
That fuck’s a fuck-fucking fuck, by virtue of that fuck calling the fuck that is you not merely a fuck but rather a fucking fuck.
anonymouse2@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Fucking fucks imply the existence of asexual fucks.
Mother-fucking fucks are all I can find on Pornhub these days.
Comment105@lemm.ee 18 hours ago
Lots of fucked fucks on there, too. For unfucked fucks.
ik5pvx@lemmy.world 1 day ago
…static fuck?
SlapnutsGT@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
Best word in the entire English language. Nothing else compares.
samus12345@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
Dasus@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
I take “what the absolute fuck” to mean there’s a platonic ideal of “fuck” and that’s what they’re referring to.
But this did make me want to find out the etymology of “absolute” :
absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 11 hours ago
(thank|fuck)you, this is going to waste my whole weekend. A visual representation of etymology, that is awesome, I guess I am one of the 10,000 today
Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 1 day ago
‘What the ever-loving fuck’ implies that love can overcome all.
theneverfox@pawb.social 21 hours ago
Or it implies that eternal love cannot exist or cannot exist in the presence of a never ending fuck, leading to the surprise in the statement
EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 22 hours ago
“What kind of fuckery is this?”
pyre@lemmy.world 1 day ago
what the absolute fuck implies relative fucks; it’s not a math term
TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 23 hours ago
|fuck|
pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 1 day ago
¿Porque no los dos?
Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 23 hours ago
Yes, this is correct.
You dont even have to be a math nerd to innately know this.
Like, I’m about to go to work & dispense imaginary fucks all day (because math-lord knows I have to real fucks to give anymore).
captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 12 hours ago
There are absolutely imaginary fucks.
samus12345@lemmy.world 11 hours ago
Nah, they just colloquial terms for emphasis. Though that’s not nearly as fun!
deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 day ago
I could fuck less.
Szyler@lemmy.world 18 hours ago
Not possible for me 🫠
Comment105@lemm.ee 18 hours ago
If negative fucks are real, then it would be possible.
Maggoty@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
Yes to all of those.
Source, my time in the Army.
marcos@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Lots and lots of possible interpretations for “I don’t give a single fuck”.
Including dozens…
hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
I don’t give a married fuck/I don’t give a widowed fuck
NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I fucking love science
Tzayad@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Holy fuck
Robust_Mirror@aussie.zone 1 day ago
Unholy fuck.
Comment105@lemm.ee 18 hours ago
I’ve seen that video
Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 23 hours ago
Both mythology fucks.
A special subset of both imaginary & irrational fucks.
ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 12 hours ago
It certainly illustrates the diversity of the word
propter_hog@hexbear.net 1 day ago
Something’s fucky
mathemachristian@hexbear.net 23 hours ago
None of that implies that fucks is a complete field sadly. If that were the case every bounded sequence of fucks would have an accumulation point. Which actually checks out, if you keep all your fucks within a certain range they’re bound to get focused on something. So never mind fucker is isomorphic to the complex field.
HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 1 day ago
We also need irrational fucks for the complex field don’t we?
over_clox@lemmy.world 1 day ago
We already have irrational fucks, they’re called politicians.
flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
Brilliant, and succinct. 10 points
kogasa@programming.dev 1 day ago
Yes, OP only gets you to Q[i]