Szyler
@Szyler@lemmy.world
- Comment on Player two has entered the lobby 17 hours ago:
That will only result in an infection in the long term without medical intervention. Not helpful for the parasite class.
- Comment on Idle thoughts 3 days ago:
Learning to notice that the automatic thought are negative ones is the first step to learning to interrupt them once it happens and shift the future automatic thoughts to be more positive.
It takes time, but is well worth going for if you find yourself doing this a lot.
- Comment on Judas 2 weeks ago:
So trump will go to heaven in April?
- Comment on The odds of anyone laughing at this are astronomical 2 weeks ago:
Not a universal joke. 3/10^24 stars.
- Comment on SHAME. 2 weeks ago:
Ok, do still some misinformation about side effects.
Sorry you had to go through that. Stay strong and advocate for the safety of your kids.
- Comment on Percentages 2 weeks ago:
I like how some games use “increases by +10%” as percentage points and “increases by 10%” as percentage.
Or how oath of exile does it, with “(base + base * increases by y%) x z% more”
So with a base of 5%, chance increased by 20%, and chance increased by 30%, with a 40% more chance, you’d get:
(5% + 5% x (20% + 30%)) x (1+40%) = 7.5% x 1.4 = 10.5%
- Comment on Percentages 2 weeks ago:
In game design +100% would be 10% + 100% = 110 crit.
Increases by +100% = base + 100% Increases by 100% = base + base x 100%
- Comment on SHAME. 2 weeks ago:
Dear boomer, words evolve.
- Comment on SHAME. 2 weeks ago:
If they used this as their argument I’d be kinder to them, it means they want what a vaccine can give, so it’s just about MISSING information, not MISSinformation.
- Comment on Q-tips 2 weeks ago:
Orgasm at home every week vs having to get doctor to cum in your ear.
- Comment on Q-tips 2 weeks ago:
But… I like the eargasms I get :(
- Comment on Brazilian's impression on Europe(i have never been there and this is based on nothing) 2 weeks ago:
Just say “you speak Brazilian, right?” and let them boil over in rage.
- Comment on Anon has an idea to get laid 3 weeks ago:
Those are accidents vs the op which was not an accident. It was legit the right place and searching for the right thing. They had some evidence to do the search legally. So your comment and this hypothetical aren’t quite the same.
- Comment on Anon needs cooking advice 4 weeks ago:
Getting a UTI speed run, any %.
- Comment on fuckery 5 weeks ago:
Not possible for me 🫠
- Comment on fuckery 5 weeks ago:
Person 1: “fuck you!” Person 2: “a real fuck to you to”
- Comment on Cleanliness is more important 5 weeks ago:
I use a fork to eat cheesedoodles. They are perfectly porous for the fork to pierce Adhd stick
- Comment on Anon gives up dating apps 1 month ago:
Do electrical engineer with renewable or environmental focus and you’ll have a more even ratio.
- Comment on Honey 1 month ago:
I agree with your arguments. We’re on the same side of all of this.
I disagree on having to remove one if both are bad. It would be like the trolley problem. 10 people suffer repeatedly indefinitely vs infinitely many suffering eventually. Moving all use to sugar cane will be worse for the environment than spreading some honey and some sugar cane. See my previous monocultulturalism point.
Personally I think honey vs sugar cane is equal, so for me the choice is bad either way. I don’t know which is worse, I try to use less, but what I use I feel is ambivalent, so I use both.
- Comment on Honey 1 month ago:
I am not vegan, but simply trying to understand how honey is bad, but as you say “unavoidable collateral damage of agriculture” or not.
There are many ways agriculture could be less harm, less pesticides, less monotone growing practices, more spread out growing. We do not have to accept these practices to not starve.
I don’t think honey collecting is worse than agriculture (even of direct plants for human consumption), so I don’t think vegans should discount honey.
- Comment on Honey 1 month ago:
Do you avoid all sugar products, or just honey?
Sugar growing also kills animals. You cannot avoid all harm, so why discount honey for the harm you know, but not discounting harm from growing sugar?
Reducing harm, sure, but it seems selective to discount honey for small amount of harm, when other things you (assumed) eat do equal (potentially unknown to you) harm.
Do you need to know every process of growing/transporting something to eat it? Or does you list of edible products shrink as you learn every new form of harm?
- Comment on Honey 1 month ago:
(Strawman)
Killing a few bees when collecting honey
Vs
Killing a lot of insects and rodents when tilling land to grow sugarcane/corn(sirup).
Why discount one not the other?
- Comment on bamboozled 2 months ago:
Oh yeah. I thought you meant how they are used culturally. Because we have many nok-berries with berry in their name.
- Comment on bamboozled 2 months ago:
Berries
- Comment on Would it be weird if I took something my neighbor put out for trash? 2 months ago:
At least he posted on the right community.
- Comment on Cords 3 months ago:
“risk a fire from staying the line with a high load”, wouldn’t the fuse in the line you plug it into simply open if you over load it?
- Comment on Deadlock (Valve's Unannounced Title) Passes 12k Peak Players in Closed Alpha 4 months ago:
Looking for an invite. Will forward to 10 others in this post if it will allow me
- Comment on Anon learns about nuts 8 months ago:
No, because there are error bars on “things”, and “everyone knows”, and on “by the time they are 30”.
This means that statistically, following a Bell curve on where people land based on this, there will be some that will be much older, and much younger that have heard of a specific thing to the point of “knowing” it.