Republicans: They’re degenerates coming for our children!
This guy: To hell with that, I’m coming for your retirement benefits.
Take a gander at this
Submitted 10 months ago by Shardikprime@lemmy.world to [deleted]
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0ac8e975-2678-45dd-a7fe-08b9dfc86d13.jpeg
Comments
Etterra@lemmy.world 10 months ago
FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 10 months ago
Why tf does Argentina let women retire earlier???
dexa_scantron@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Patriarchy oppresses us all.
MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 10 months ago
Women get to retire five years earlier than men
The patriarchy did this!
FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 10 months ago
Yeah, that sounds about right.
then_three_more@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Britain did until quite recently. Then a group of men went to court, I think hoping to get the men’s age lowered to that of women. But of course the government raised the women’s age to that of men.
Hahah_Montana@lemmy.wtf 10 months ago
You say that as if it was the men’s fault for trying to get equal treatment. Clearly you have no idea how the legal system works.
SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Because women on average live longer. Strange isn’t it.
steuls@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Why would that mean they get to retire earlier then?
uis@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Maybe opposite? Maybe women live lomger because they retire earlier?
ben_dover@lemmy.ml 10 months ago
it’s the same in many European countries
LordTE7R1S@lemmy.sdf.org 10 months ago
Yeap, women retire at 60 and men retire at 65.
Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
Yeah, this seems backwards… Women tend to love longer than men.
then_three_more@lemmy.world 10 months ago
X for doubt as this comes from the daily Hail
RobotZap10000@feddit.nl 10 months ago
Daily Heil*
LordTE7R1S@lemmy.sdf.org 10 months ago
This one is real.
Source: am argentine
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 months ago
It may be real, but I’m finding a Russian nesting doll’s worth of references to other sites when I try to find more info. The closest I can get is a blurb on this website, which claims to get its info from an AFP article it doesn’t link to.
AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 10 months ago
People gonna make this a trans thing and not a gender equality one… in most things women get the shitty treatment but with retirement and mental health its men
AnxiousDuck@feddit.it 10 months ago
And office clothing in summer
valkyre09@lemmy.world 10 months ago
You could always follow in the footsteps of these bus drivers:
fukurthumz420@lemmy.world 10 months ago
i’m going to make it both. we really do need to advance women’s equality before we let men take their identities in order to dilute the few offsets women have had legislated for them.
just like how many affirmative action band-aids are being ripped off before poc have actually gotten equal footing in society, we are pushing women’s advances backwards by pretending that we live in an equal society and allowing men to take advantage of the mechanisms meant to promote equality.
puppy@lemmy.world 10 months ago
For clarification I am against Jordan Peterson and the ilk but equal opportunity y’all.
Darkraisisi@feddit.nl 10 months ago
What does the first part add to your statement? Is that his selling point?
hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
Looks like some weird hoop thinking advocating men’s rights (equal retirement age) is only done by Petersen and other nutcases
humbletightband@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
He actually supports Jordan Peterson but feels bad about it
Juice@midwest.social 10 months ago
Because Ive been conditioned never question laws and never learned to mentally deal with contradictions in society I’m mad at the pronouns now! Those darn pronouns!
the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 10 months ago
I don’t use pronouns and I don’t think you or they should either.
SleezyDizasta@lemmy.world 10 months ago
What?
Juice@midwest.social 10 months ago
Is this an actual question or are you being indignant? If you have actual questions can you please try to articulate them? If I try and answer you without knowing what questions you are asking, we are more likely to get frustrated.
Hopefully you aren’t just being indignant.
lanigerous@feddit.uk 10 months ago
It’s the Daily Mail, it’s most likely total fiction as they do this all the time.
LordTE7R1S@lemmy.sdf.org 10 months ago
Not this time, it’s real. Source: am argentine
dmalteseknight@programming.dev 10 months ago
Take a gender at this*
woelkchen@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Take a gender at this*
No, it’s a play on words as is.
Shardikprime@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Thanks for noticing, all the meme effort was worth it for this. Thanks
AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Helps if you put the first definition as well. I would think that the use of the word as a glance is more common than male goose.
rez_doggie@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Shut up, nerd lol
OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 10 months ago
So, obviously, people don’t generally change their legal gender for an advantage somewhere. But if they do, that’s a pretty good sign, not that it’s too easy to change your gender, but that there’s a gender bias in the law.
So arguably, the easier it is to change your legal gender, the less of a problem gender-based affirmative action is. Conservatives must love this! End liberal overreach in one easy step!
watersnipje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 months ago
I agree. The Daily Mail no doubt uses this as a way to say “legally changing your gender should be harder”, but that’s fixing the wrong problem. Gender fluidity isn’t the problem, gender inequality is.
Gender should be as unimportant as eye color in most things in life. If your system breaks from someone changing their gender, you need to fix your system.
CerealKiller01@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Thing is, There are less women in STEM, there are less women in management position etc. Therefor, either women are less interested/worse at these things (which is the conservative view) or society itself treats women differently than men. The rational behind affirmative action and programs geared towards women isn’t that women are less skilled and therefore need more help, rather that society makes it harder for a woman achieve the same as a similarly skilled man. By treating women differently we can help level the playing field.
Also, making gender “as unimportant as eye color in most things in life” is a completely unrealistic goal in the near future even in the most liberal countries in the world. We can (and do) strive to reach it, but that’s not a viable solution for issues we have right now.
And you know what? Legally changing your gender SHOULD be harder than filling a form. Someone who’s transgender should have no problem showing that’s what they are. The thing is to make sure the legal process is done respectfully, without making the person feel like they’re being interrogated.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 months ago
So arguably, the easier it is to change your legal gender, the less of a problem gender-based affirmative action is.
Gender-based public sector affirmative action exists to counterbalance discrimination in the private sector. I would argue that becoming trans to undermine gender-AA is penny wise and pound foolish, unless you were already tending towards that inclination.
But what I’m seeing here is “I’m changing my gender but only for the purposes of gaming the system, then I expect you to recognize me as my original gender again”. And that’s on par with carrying a pair of crutches in your trunk so you can park in handicapped spaces.
You don’t really want to take on the burden of being recognized as a woman. You just want to pocket a benefit in the public sector and then go back to your privileged position in the private sector.
blahsay@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Feminism means gender equality people.
sparkle@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Feminism means gender goes into the shredder. No gender. FUCK gender, punk ass bitch ass social construct. Kill it with fire.
Note: many feminists may or may not disagree
SleezyDizasta@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Lmao what?
blahsay@lemmy.world 10 months ago
You want a new word for your thing.
Side note: Violence and extremism isn’t helpful - attitudes like yours are far more effective at promoting reactive forces like trump than any number of maga hats. It’s sad to see the left obliviously acting as a driving force for the far right. Perhaps look up how people change opinions if you’re serious?
MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 10 months ago
Modern problems require modern solutions
ikidd@lemmy.world 10 months ago
I had a nephew that found out he could get a $500 bursary for trade school as a male, or $5000 as a female. A trip down to the DMV netted him (her) $4500.
Can’t say I wasn’t amused.
meldrik@lemmy.wtf 10 months ago
Smart
manwoman!Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Well why not I guess
fukurthumz420@lemmy.world 10 months ago
because laws like this were made to offset the patriarchal dominance of a society shaped by men for centuries. it’s unfair to women to let men just take those offsets away from them and it’s the elephant in the room that nobody wants to address as they cheer for trans-women’s rights.
Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Would just be easier to have an equal society
boatsnhos931@lemmy.world 10 months ago
God damn legend status
Kuragi2@lemmynsfw.com 10 months ago
Based.
keiichii12@ani.social 10 months ago
Dumb idea: it feels bad being second class in things like retirement, empathy, and mental health, etc., right guys?
Well, that’s how our sisters on the other side feel about literally everything else. If we want to fight so hard for the few things us men lack, let’s use that same energy to fight for women too.
postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Equality, aint it great?
fnrir@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Can’t wait to see that happen in Poland as well.
uis@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Why from that side of beaver curve?
BenchpressMuyDebil@szmer.info 10 months ago
Men retire 5 years later than women there as well.
Thcdenton@lemmy.world 10 months ago
The face of a man with no regerts
udon@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Ah, good source, thanks! That weighs up everything!
uis@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Look in this thread: lemmy.sdf.org/comment/12482757
udon@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Thanks, but that was not the point of my comment. I’m just happy about that post, because finally I learned women get more privileges than men and I can ignore everything I heard about wage gaps, glass ceilings, and sexism at work. What a relief!
answersplease77@lemmy.world 10 months ago
identify as tomboy lesbian woman who was born biologically a male so you get to keep your lifestyle, your wife, and your cock.
sparkle@lemm.ee 10 months ago
can i get two cocks
Shardikprime@lemmy.world 10 months ago
One cook is too expensive, wages for two require exceptional qualifications
twig@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
Cool
graphene@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Good
gibmiser@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Yeah I’ll say I’m a goddamn elf if it means I get 5 extra years of not having to work
sirico@feddit.uk 10 months ago
Nope you get to work in a toy factory 364 days a year GG
whostosay@lemmy.world 10 months ago
ggs