Digital Bros joins the chorus of game companies putting people out of work in the name of "operational efficiency."
Never even heard of them. Yea no always online bullshit, battle passes or micro transactions. No stupid launchers either.
505 Games' parent company lays off 30% of its workforce, says gamers really only want sequels so that's what it's going to make
Submitted 1 year ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to games@lemmy.world
Comments
JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I keep finding all these cool games and instantly get deflated when I find out they’re online. I want single player, i really don’t like playing with other people.
StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I remember being a kid playing Morrowind and really wishing my friends could play with me.
Now I’m an adult and I don’t want to play with the kids. They have way more time to play and take my ass to the cleaners. After the umpteenth time getting tea bagged while some 13 year old goes on about fucking my mother, his voice breaking repeatedly throughout, I swore off multiplayer.
JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I feel you, I mostly skip the online parts unless they are private games with a few people I know.
corytheboyd@kbin.social 1 year ago
You many not agree, but he’s right. We are not most people. They want, and they have, that sweet “lowest common denominator” market, and they will take advantage of that until something else generates more cash. The “lowest common denominator” demand more CoD and whatnot. They don’t care if it’s bad, because them and all their friends will buy it and perhaps even have some fun. The big studios converging on raking in cash instead of creating interesting content is depressing, sure, but hardly surprising in a world where morals and ethics don’t matter, you can get away with the absolute most heinous, reprehensible acts, and suffer zero consequences.
Narrrz@kbin.social 1 year ago
and the open source, free tools for creating such games are getting better almost by the day.
Djennik@lemmy.world 1 year ago
There is still hope in projects like baldurs gate 3
GenEcon@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Which is a sequel…
The best selling new game was Hogwarts Legacy. Which still has a strong IP behind it (which really was the only reason the game was selling so much).
The only game in the top 10 of the best selling games 2023 without being a sequel or having a strong IP behind it, is Starfield.
imapuppetlookaway@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Yeah i think we’re in a golden age of indie games. When i want to find a new game, i search youtube for “best indie games of 2018” or 2017, 2021 or whatever. So much great stuff to play made in the last 5-10 years. And so much more affordable. And it feels great to give my money to these devs.
MrMcGasion@lemmy.world 1 year ago
If someone told me 4-5 years ago, that the year we got really incredible sequels to both Breath of the Wild, and that cool new Spider-Man game on PS4, my most-enjoyed game would be an indie Lovecraftian light-horror fishing game, I wouldn’t have believed them.
DrQuint@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Yeah. I’m of the same mind. I was here to witness the resurgence of Boomer and Movement Shooters. Now, we’re in the cusp of the resurgence of RTS.
The last game published by 505 I played were apparently Indivisible, which was trash. I never played Ghostrunner nor Control which basically eliminates most of their notable recent output. I think I can safely say I’ll be fine with my continued ignoring of them as a publisher.
Entropywins@kbin.social 1 year ago
Some people didn't like it but I fucking loved Control...great game and worth a play imho
Asafum@feddit.nl 1 year ago
Spacebourne 2.
Not polished, not amazing graphics, but turning out to be a damn good game that most “AAA” developers wouldn’t even try to make, that was made by one guy (and now a small team of volunteers/contractors lol)
slaacaa@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Also, making a good game is always a risk, it’s an intersection of tech, business, and art. Control e.g. sold only a few million copies, depsite being widely praised.
If you however want be sure, you invest a lot in marketing and monetisation, targeting a wide audience as you said, and can take a lower risk to make back your investment. Absolutely hate this of course, but luckily there are still good games, as long as e.g. Sony is willing to take that risk to sell more PS consoles, or we get wonders like BG3
scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 1 year ago
Yup. They’ll let smaller studios take risks on new IP and buy them if it’s profitable. They get the wins but none of the losses.
scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 1 year ago
Everyone should start prepping for cheaper and crappier “AAA” titles moving forward.
deus@lemmy.world 1 year ago
cheaper
I wish
Catpurple@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 year ago
Cheaper development budgets, no room for QA, rushed out the door; still sold for 70 bucks.
mateomaui@reddthat.com 1 year ago
cheaper quality
dojan@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Nah, I don’t want to pay less for AAA games. I don’t pay for them at all. They’re all mass-produced garbage.
slaacaa@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Already there, though not with the cheap part
Neato@kbin.social 1 year ago
I don't recall the last AAA or major studio game I bought.
SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I can’t remember the last time I got drunk.
Grangle1@lemm.ee 1 year ago
What gamers want is innovation and overall fun gameplay, sequel or not. I’ve heard rather little coming from AAA studios of interest to me as of late 'cause they’ve all gone to creating endless battle royales, action RPGs or looter-shooters that all play near identically, all with the same military or techno jungle aesthetic that just doesn’t appeal to me. It’s all gunning for their game to get big on that e-sport sponsorship money or find some way to load their games with micro transaction pay to win gambling BS. For the most part, small and indie studios are doing as well as the AAA big boys because they are able to put more creativity into their games on smaller budgets. When a big AAA game such as BG3 does succeed, it’s because they put as much or more effort and care into innovative and entertaining gameplay as they do into fancy ray tracing graphics and cash grab mechanics. Games like BG3 are as praised as they are because they are complete games that work like they should out of the box, no day 1 patch/DLC or extra money required for the full intended experience. We get the quality we expect for our $60-$70. Whether that’s a brand new IP or a sequel doesn’t matter much.
Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 1 year ago
My only quibble with this is that I’m not sure I’d classify larian as a AAA studio. Not when you’re comparing to Activision or Bethesda or something. The game is absolutely amazing, I’ve put over 700 hours in and am still playing it. I can’t think of any of the big AAA studios releasing a game that comes close anytime in the last decade.
Phegan@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Game devs should unionize
warmaster@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I get it’s a PRstunt to cocer the fact they are just downsizing their mismanaged Business.
SwallowsDick@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Like retail chains blaming theft for shutting down locations
Gonzako@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Execs see baldurs gate 3 doing great and they don’t get further than the title lol
avater@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Yeah if the sequels are good and not like Payday 3…
badbytes@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Sounds like parent company is Disney
BananaTrifleViolin@kbin.social 1 year ago
Ironic for a company that published indie hits like Terraria and fresh mainstream games like A Tale of 2 Sons.
This does not reflect the whole gaming market but rather the failure of publishers to innovate well and make new things people like. Big publishers are risk averse and it's a common path them as they get bigger, and care more about shareholder value or venture capital. They won't take risks, and can't accept failures so they retrench. It's not a recipe for success as that end of the games market is already dominated by big publishers churning out annual versions of their mass market games.
A publisher like 505 r ally only has two possible futures on this road - go bankrupt as they can't compete or get bought out by a big fish who want their IP.
It doesn't say much abou the games market as it's actually very large, vibrant and varied. A publisher like 505 is not on the vanguard of the games market and like most people I had to look them up to even see which games they had published. This is just yet another company being mismanaged into oblivion and well beyond its hey day.
NightAuthor@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Isn’t baulders gate a good example of an indie dev doing good work and not just playing it safe? While also not going bankrupt.
KermitLeFrog@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Baldur’s gate is the third installment in a decades old franchise that is based on d&d, a franchise that has been popular for nearly 50 years now
quams69@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Why do these ghouls run businesses in an industry they clearly don’t have any faith in or understanding of,
postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 year ago
sequels of what?
flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 1 year ago
It is always amusing to see the head of optional entertainment industries make statements like they are making a declaration on par with climate change, a economic depression, etc. As if they expect massive press coverage and endless crying by their would be customers.
When in reality the actual reaction by most is along the lines of “oh no, anyway” and move on to the next bit of optional entertainment media while they and their company are forgotten to the trash pile of failed companies.
Sanctus@lemmy.world 1 year ago
All you See Sweets can keep trying to quantify what it is gamers like. The truth is its ephemeral until it is materialized and on our screens. You never know how fun your thing is until milliona of people can access it. So stop trying to codify it, or find a formula. There is none. Make fun shit, take all the risk. Make new shit that no one has ever made before. But for the love of fps fucking please don’t pretend you’ve drilled down on what gamers like. Thats a promise to fail.
bleistift2@feddit.de 1 year ago
When’s the last time you played an indie game?
henfredemars@infosec.pub 1 year ago
I’m only one data point but nearly all my gaming hours are indie.
cyborganism@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
Uh… Yesterday? They’ve become my go to now. They’re so much more fun. A lot of them are just pick up and play. And they bring new concepts and stories instead of the same old crap.
corytheboyd@kbin.social 1 year ago
Was always a big fan, but the steam deck has me playing a handful of new indie games every month, and it’s fucking awesome. So many little gems, so many unique ideas, for way less money, way less time invested, way less SERIOUS BUSINESS.
Nelots@lemm.ee 1 year ago
About 15 minutes ago. Slay The Spire is fun.
Frogster8@lemmy.world 1 year ago
This comment needs to come with a warning, I bought slay the spire 2 weeks ago and it combined with a steam deck is taking over my life. It has the civ “one more turn” factor massively, doesn’t seem to have the same run diversity as Binding of isaac but it’s as addictive.
Tavarin@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
Tuesday, why?
half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Bg3 is indie
Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Just finished UNPACKING last night and it was so addictive. Before that I played forager which I loved, and before that I played the shit out of Dysmantle and Wytchwood. I love AAA games but there are some really great Indies out there
snooggums@kbin.social 1 year ago
Earlier this week! I play what I like and that covers a pretty wide variety.
wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 1 year ago
Every time I play, it seems like. Ive not bought a AAA game made within the past 4 years, and older than that is always at 50%+ discounts.
I buy full price indie games once a month or two.
jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 1 year ago
Played slay the spire on the train this weekend. Also monster train. Played a lot of sandrock the past couple months, too. (Heidi is my love).
I do play a lot of guild wars 2 though. The old standby.
vxx@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Paid 60 bucks since September on games and sunk over 200 hours into them. Vampire survivors for 3, slay the spire for 6 and Baldurs Gate for 50.
I have only 30 hours on Baldurs Gate though.
Marsupial@quokk.au 1 year ago
Basically all I play outside of Paradox titles these days.
Ruu@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I just beat OneShot yesterday, and before that I beat Dodgeball Academia. In my top 25 favorite games, only 5 of then are AAA, the rest are Indie or AA. There are no AAA in my top 5 of all time.
GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 1 year ago
A quick 5 minute search shows me that this is true. Lots of articles and lists out there. And the only games I could see that weren’t sequels or remakes, are Starfield and Harry Potter.
This isn’t a new development either. Pong had a sequel.
orion2145@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Elden Ring. Cyberpunk. Outer Wilds. HiFi Rush. Stray. Midnight Suns (licensed like Potter but original).
Not saying a lot. But far from none. And alongside Starfield and Horizon Forbidden West (second game in an original series) it’s hardly no original titles.
GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Not arguing. Just stating my experience.
slazer2au@lemmy.world 1 year ago
We like new IP. We just don’t want trash at launch.
mateomaui@reddthat.com 1 year ago
Or live service games.
Stovetop@lemmy.world 1 year ago
The problem is that it’s a measurement of trust.
New IP comes out, people are apprehensive if they know nothing about it.
Sequel to popular IP comes out, people trust it because they know and like the earlier game, and assume a sequel will be more of that.
And if a sequel ever deviates from the proven model of its predecessors, people lose their shit.
That’s why you see so much recycled garbage come out, because trying something new usually results in more risk and lower returns. Not always, but usually.